| Literature DB >> 28025494 |
Ângelo C Salvador1,2, Ewelina Król3, Virgínia C Lemos4, Sónia A O Santos5, Fernanda P M S Bento6,7, Carina P Costa8, Adelaide Almeida9, Dawid Szczepankiewicz10, Bartosz Kulczyński11, Zbigniew Krejpcio12, Armando J D Silvestre13, Sílvia M Rocha14.
Abstract
Elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) lipophilic and polar extract dietary supplementation effects were evaluated according to diabetes management indices, using an in vivo model. A research pipeline was constructed, that ranged from extract preparation, partial chemical characterization and toxicity evaluation, to examining the elderberry extract dietary supplementation effects on biofluid and tissues. Extracts toxicity was screened using an Aliivibrio fischeri bioluminescence model. A concentration of up to 60 mg/L was selected, and rat doses for oral supplementation were computed applying the interspecies correlation between A. fischeri and rats. Wistar type 2 diabetic rats, induced by streptozotocin (STZ), were fed a high-fat diet and supplemented for 4 weeks at doses of 190 and 350 mg/kg body weight/day of lipophilic and polar extract, respectively. As far as we know, lipophilic elderberry extract supplementation was assessed for the first time, while polar extract was administrated at higher doses and for a shorter period compared to previous studies, aiming to evaluate subacute supplementation effects. The polar extract modulated glucose metabolism by correcting hyperglycemia, while the lipophilic extract lowered insulin secretion. Both extracts lowered insulin resistance, without remarkable alterations to hematological indices, sera lipids and sera and tissular trace element homeostasis. In conclusion, elderberries are a potential source of bioactive compounds for formulations to be used as co-adjuvants in diabetes management.Entities:
Keywords: Sambucus nigra L.; diabetic rats; elderberry extracts supplementation; high-fat diet; lipophilic extract; polar extract
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28025494 PMCID: PMC5297648 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18010013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Main stages of elderberry extract preparation, partial characterization, and toxicity evaluation; followed by Wistar rat elderberry extract supplementation and biofluid and tissue analysis. NDB: non-diabetic group; DBNS: diabetic group/not supplemented; DBLE: diabetic group/supplemented with lipophilic extract; and DBPE: diabetic group/supplemented with polar extract. UHPLC-MS: ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, ABTS: 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid).
Extraction yield and antioxidant activities of S. nigra L. polar berry extract.
| Parameter | Values | |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction yield (%, m/m, d.w.) | 58.2 ± 6.3 | |
| Antioxidant activity | ABTS a | 2.37 ± 0.28 |
| DPPH a | 0.63 ± 0.03 | |
Values expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3; d.w.—dry weight; a expressed in mmol TE/g extract; ABTS: 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid); DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
Calibration data used for the ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet detection (UHPLC-UV) quantification of phenolic compounds in S. nigra L. polar berry extract.
| Compound | λ (nm) | Conc. Range (μg/mL) | Calibration Curve a | LOD b | LOQ b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (μg/mL) | ||||||
| Quercetin 3-glucoside | 340 | 1.00 × 10−1—20.0 | 0.994 | 1.92 | 6.39 | |
| Cyanidin 3-glucoside | 520 | 1.00 × 10−1—20.0 | 0.999 | 7.40 × 10−1 | 2.49 | |
a y: peak area; x: concentration in μg/mL; b LOD: limit of detection; LOQ: limit of quantification.
Phenolic compounds identified in S. nigra L. berry polar extract and corresponding MS fragmentation profiles.
| R.t. (min) | Compound | λ (nm) | [M + H]+ ( | MS2 ( | MS3 ( | [M − H]− ( | MS2 ( | MS3 ( | Content (g/100 g Extract) | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | Caffeyolquinic acid | 280 | - | - | - | 353 | 191, 179 | - | [ | |
| 9.4 | Cyanidin 3,5-diglucoside a | 514, 278 | 611 | 449 b, 287 | 287 | - | - | - | 0.11 ± 0.02 | [ |
| 10.9 | Cyanidin 3-sambubioside-5-glucoside a | 514, 278 | 743 | 581, 449 b, 287 | 287 | - | - | - | 0.80 ± 0.22 | [ |
| 12.9 | Cyanidin 3-glucoside a | 514, 278 | 449 | 287 | - | - | - | - | 4.46 ± 0.74 | coinjection |
| 13.3 | Cyanidin 3-sambubioside a | 514, 278 | 581 | 449, 287 | - | - | - | - | 4.80 ± 0.91 | [ |
| 17.9 | Quercetin 3-glucoside c | 349, 265 | - | - | - | 463 | 301 b, 179 | 179, 151 | 0.87 ± 0.20 | coinjection |
| 18.5 | Quercetin 3-rutinoside c | 340, 258 | - | - | - | 609 | 301 b, 255 | 179, 151 | 1.43 ± 0.02 | [ |
| 23.3 | Quercetin c | 259, 367 | - | - | - | 301 | 179, 151 | - | 0.18 ± 0.06 | [ |
| Total | 12.64 ± 2.21 |
Content values expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3; R.t.—retention time; tr—trace; MS2, MS3 − second and third stage of mass spectrometry; Calibration curves used: a cyanidin 3-glucoside, c quercetin 3-glucoside; b Product ions were subjected to further MS3 fragmentation.
Figure 2Bioluminescence monitoring of A. fischeri treated with elderberry polar (A); and lipophilic (B) extracts.
Effects of dietary supplementation of elderberry polar and lipophilic extracts on the rats’ overall growth indices. Diabetic rats without dietary supplementation and non-diabetic rats were also followed-up.
| Index | Non-Diabetic Rats ( | Diabetic Rats with High-Fat Diets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Supplemented ( | Polar Extract ( | Lipophilic Extract ( | ||
| Diet intake (g/24 h) | 20.1 ± 1.1 a | 20.9 ± 2.1 a | 22.7 ± 2.9 a | 20.8 ± 2.2 a |
| Daily extract intake (mg/kg b.w.) | - | - | 350 ± 3 | 190 ± 3 |
| Average body weight at the beginning/end of experiment (g) | 424.56/443.88 | 383.31/383.38 | 370.73/368.41 | 410.77/415.67 |
| Body weight variation (g/24 h) | 0.69 ± 0.08 a | 0.00 ± 0.34 b | −0.08 ± 0.38 b | 0.18 ± 0.65 a,b |
| Body mass/body length ratio (g/cm) | 16.7 ± 1.3 a | 14.7 ± 1.3 a | 14.3 ± 1.1 a | 16.1 ± 1.5 a |
| Liver (% b.m.) | 3.04 ± 0.24 a | 3.38 ± 0.32 a | 3.39 ± 0.22 a | 3.26 ± 0.21 a |
| Kidneys (% b.m.) | 0.60 ± 0.04 a | 0.85 ± 0.11 b | 0.88 ± 0.11 b | 0.78 ± 0.12 b |
| Heart (% b.m.) | 0.28 ± 0.02 a | 0.29 ± 0.03 a | 0.29 ± 0.02 a | 0.30 ± 0.07 a |
| Testes (% b.m.) | 0.93 ± 0.04 a | 0.97 ± 0.07 a | 0.98 ± 0.15 a | 0.61 ± 0.35 a |
| Pancreas (% b.m.) | 0.24 ± 0.04 a | 0.26 ± 0.02 a | 0.26 ± 0.04 a | 0.22 ± 0.04 a |
| Spleen (% b.m.) | 0.15 ± 0.02 a | 0.15 ± 0.02 a | 0.13 ± 0.01 a | 0.14 ± 0.02 a |
| Left femur (% b.m.) | 0.21 ± 0.02 a | 0.24 ± 0.02 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | 0.23 ± 0.02 a |
| Right femur (% b.m.) | 0.22 ± 0.01 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | 0.23 ± 0.03 a |
Values expressed as mean ± SD; b.w.—body weight; b.m.—body mass; Mean values with unlike letters in rows show statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s Fisher test).
Effects of dietary supplementation of elderberry polar and lipophilic extracts on the rats’ blood morphology and hematology indices. Diabetic rats without dietary supplementation and non-diabetic rats were also followed-up.
| Index | Non-Diabetic Rats ( | Diabetic Rats with High-Fat Diets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Supplemented ( | Polar Extract ( | Lipophilic Extract ( | ||
| RBC (1012/L) | 9.42 ± 0.17 a | 9.77 ± 0.46 a | 9.88 ± 0.54 a | 9.50 ± 0.37 a |
| HGB (mmol/L) | 15.24 ± 0.38 a | 15.95 ± 0.56 a | 16.13 ± 0.82 a | 15.53 ± 0.39 a |
| Hematocrit (%) | 44.64 ± 1.58 a | 46.14 ± 2.28 a | 44.57 ± 3.01 a | 43.28 ± 1.70 a |
| MCV (10−15 L) | 47.39 ± 1.32 a | 47.30 ± 2.77 a | 45.17 ± 2.78 a | 45.63 ± 2.82 a |
| MCH (10−15 kg) | 16.18 ± 0.23 a | 16.40 ± 0.87 a | 16.34 ± 0.62 a | 16.37 ± 0.42 a |
| MCHC (10−2 kg/L) | 34.14 ± 0.55 a | 34.71 ± 1.04 a,b | 36.23 ± 1.01 b | 35.92 ± 1.33 a,b |
| WBC (109/L) | 4.51 ± 1.04 a | 2.80 ± 0.98 b | 3.03 ± 0.49 b | 2.97 ± 0.68 b |
| MONO (103/μL) | 0.44 ± 0.15 a | 0.17 ± 0.08 b | 0.24 ± 0.06 b | 0.21 ± 0.09 b |
| LYMPH (103/μL) | 3.72 ± 1.01 a | 1.92 ± 0.53 b | 2.35 ± 0.51 a,b | 2.38 ± 0.63 a,b |
| PLT (1012/L) | 1129 ± 99 a | 866 ± 129 b,c | 960 ± 114 a,c | 855 ± 144 b,c |
| PDW (10−15/L) | 9.10 ± 0.44 a | 9.54 ± 0.24 a | 9.73 ± 0.56 a | 10.22 ± 1.52 a |
| MPV (10−15/L) | 7.92 ± 0.20 a | 8.11 ± 0.29 a | 8.04 ± 0.51 a | 8.25 ± 0.41 a |
| p-LCR (%) | 10.70 ± 1.60 a | 12.13 ± 1.91 a | 11.86 ± 3.71 a | 13.20 ± 3.25 a |
| RDW-SD (10−15 L) | 30.68 ± 1.72 a | 35.45 ± 1.96 b | 33.01 ± 2.01 a,b | 33.58 ± 2.07 a,b |
Values expressed as mean ± SD; Mean values with unlike letters in rows show statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s Fisher test); RBC—red blood cell count; HGB—blood hemoglobin concentration; MCV—mean corpuscular volume; MCH—mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC—mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; WBC—white blood cell count; MONO—monocyte count; LYMPH—lymphocyte count; PLT—platelet count; PDW—platelet distribution width; MPV—mean platelet volume; p-LCR—platelet large-cell ratio; RDW-SD—red cell distribution width based on standard deviation.
Figure 3Elderberry extracts dietary supplementation effects on (A) fasting blood glucose concentration; (B) fasting plasma insulin; (C) insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR); and (D) β cells function index (HOMA-β) on high-fat diet fed STZ-induced diabetic rats. Diabetic rats without dietary supplementation and non-diabetic rats were also followed-up. NDB: non-diabetic group; DBNS: diabetic group/not supplemented; DBPE: diabetic group/supplemented with polar extract; and DBLE: diabetic group/supplemented with lipophilic extract. Mean values with different letters show statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s Fisher test).
Effects of dietary supplementation of elderberry polar and lipophilic extracts on the rats’ sera lipids, inflammatory and toxicity indices.
| Index | Non-Diabetic Rats ( | Diabetic Rats with High-Fat Diets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Supplemented ( | Polar Extract ( | Lipophilic Extract ( | ||
| Total cholesterol concentration (mg/dL) | 99.34 ± 15.01 a | 83.34 ± 17.04 a | 90.79 ± 11.16 a | 90.92 ± 14.25 a |
| HDL cholesterol concentration (mg/dL) | 72.80 ± 3.19 a | 64.69 ± 13.32 a | 71.37 ± 10.09 a | 71.28 ± 11.25 a |
| LDL cholesterol concentration (mg/dL) | 12.15 ± 8.86 a | 4.36 ± 1.89 a | 7.13 ± 5.03 a | 6.90 ± 5.45 a |
| Triacylglycerol (mg/dL) | 88.44 ± 45.21 a | 110.79 ± 77.90 a | 65.52 ± 14.91 a | 82.50 ± 28.87 a |
| Total protein (10−2 kg/L) | 6.86 ± 0.40 a | 6.36 ± 0.52 a,b | 6.09 ± 0.52 a,b | 6.45 ± 0.38 a,b |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 34.12 ± 5.25 a | 48.51 ± 7.79 b | 38.65 ± 8.38 a,b | 34.92 ± 6.19 a |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 4.88 ± 0.44 a | 10.98 ± 2.61 b | 15.03 ± 4.76 b | 7.78 ± 3.02 a,b |
| ALT (U/L) | 26.00 ± 10.32 a | 53.00 ± 26.38 a,b | 69.43 ± 30.54 b | 54.67 ± 21.02 a,b |
| AST (U/L) | 78.00 ± 32.60 a | 97.43 ± 18.21 a | 128.14 ± 69.37 a | 104.20 ± 33.21 a |
| ALP (U/L) | 60.20 ± 8.73 a | 165.00 ± 53.71 b | 152.29 ± 34.75 b | 108.67 ± 39.05 a,b |
Values expressed as mean ± SD; Mean values with unlike letters in rows show statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s Fisher test). HDL—high-density lipoprotein; LDL—low-density lipoprotein; ALT—alanine aminotransaminase; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; ALP—alkaline phosphatase.
Effects of dietary supplementation of elderberry polar and lipophilic extracts on the rats’ sera and tissular Zn, Fe and Cu levels. Diabetic rats without dietary supplementation and non-diabetic rats were also followed-up.
| Index | Non-Diabetic Rats ( | Diabetic Rats with High-Fat Diets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Supplemented ( | Polar Extract ( | Lipophilic Extract ( | ||
| Zn (μg/g dry mass) | ||||
| Liver | 144.69 ± 16.78 a | 141.48 ± 9.47 a | 138.56 ± 17.36 a | 144.50 ± 41.78 a |
| Kidney | 94.63 ± 4.06 a | 114.04 ± 12.61 b | 120.77 ± 17.81 b | 114.04 ± 17.89 a,b |
| Sera (μg/dL) | 133.81 ± 23.56 a | 121.27 ± 19.26 a | 128.10 ± 21.06 a | 121.15 ± 12.55 a |
| Fe (μg/g dry mass) | ||||
| Liver | 427.63 ± 51.20 a | 487.06 ± 108.45 a | 459.61 ± 127.83 a | 512.50 ± 189.15 a |
| Kidney | 301.93 ± 33.20 a | 353.06 ± 58.20 a | 299.16 ± 56.05 a | 360.12 ± 48.02 a |
| Sera (µg/dL) | 116.76 ± 14.75 a | 141.11 ± 21.25 a | 139.77 ± 36.31 a | 149.23 ± 22.38 a |
| Cu (μg/g dry mass) | ||||
| Liver | 20.08 ± 1.11 a | 18.30 ± 2.53 a | 17.60 ± 1.57 a | 18.63 ± 6.50 a |
| Kidney | 26.87 ± 5.60 a | 54.29 ± 18.13 b | 59.87 ± 16.94 b | 46.55 ± 18.81 a,b |
| Sera (μg/dL) | 120.12 ± 8.14 a | 94.50 ± 19.30 b | 101.45 ± 16.15 a,b | 92.20 ± 9.29 b |
Values expressed as mean ± SD; Mean values with unlike letters in rows show statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s Fisher test).