Literature DB >> 25601382

The effects of progressive lateralization of the joint center of rotation of reverse total shoulder implants.

Oren Costantini1, Daniel S Choi1, Andreas Kontaxis1, Lawrence V Gulotta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been a renewed interest in lateralizing the center of rotation (CoR) in implants used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of lateralization of the CoR on the glenohumeral joint contact forces, muscle moment arms, torque across the bone-implant interface, and the stability of the implant.
METHODS: A 3-dimensional virtual model was used to investigate how lateralization affects deltoid muscle moment arm and glenohumeral joint contact forces. This model was virtually implanted with 5 progressively lateralized reverse shoulder prostheses. The joint contact loads and deltoid moment arms were calculated for each lateralization over the course of 3 simulated standard humerothoracic motions.
RESULTS: Lateralization of the CoR leads to an increase in the overall joint contact forces across the glenosphere. Most of this increased loading occurred through compression, although increases in anterior/posterior and superior/inferior shear were also observed. Moment arms of the deltoid consistently decreased with lateralization. Bending moments at the implant interface increased with lateralization. Progressive lateralization resulted in improved stability ratios.
CONCLUSIONS: Lateralization results in increased joint loading. Most of that loading occurs through compression, although there were also increases in shear forces. Anterior/posterior shear is currently not accounted for in implant fixation studies, leaving its effect on implant fixation unknown. Future studies should incorporate shear forces into their models to more accurately assess fixation methods.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; biomechanical study; computer modeling; glenoid loading; implant design; lateralization; moment arms; muscle forces

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25601382     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  18 in total

1.  Benefits of a metallic lateralized baseplate prolonged by a long metallic post in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to address glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Johanna Sekri; Jean Kany; Imen Nidtahar; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Kevin Chan; G Daniel G Langohr; Matthew Mahaffy; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Customized tantalum-augmented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid bone defect and excessive medialization: description of the technique.

Authors:  Nicola Ivaldo; Tony Mangano; Giovanni Caione; Mario Rossoni; Angelo Ligas
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 5.  Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice.

Authors:  Jean-David Werthel; Gilles Walch; Emilie Vegehan; Pierric Deransart; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Philippe Valenti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; Joseph Choi; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 8.  Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of the available evidence.

Authors:  Richard Dimock; Mohamed Fathi Elabd; Mohamed Imam; Mark Middleton; Arnaud Godenèche; A Ali Narvani
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-06-02

9.  The effect of metaglene lateralization on joint mobility of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Stephanie Kahmann; Michael Hackl; Stephan Uschok; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12

10.  Infraspinatus and deltoid length and patient height: implications for lateralization and distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Spencer R Lindsay; Weston Smith; Jun Kawakami; Ryan Hill; Robert Z Tashjian; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.