Literature DB >> 18328739

In vitro and finite element analysis of glenoid bone/baseplate interaction in the reverse shoulder design.

Nazeem A Virani1, Melinda Harman, Ke Li, Jonathan Levy, Derek R Pupello, Mark A Frankle.   

Abstract

We developed biomechanical and finite element models, using high-strength polyurethane foam blocks, to represent the glenoid bone/baseplate junction to determine if increasing the distance between the glenoid bone and the center of rotation of the glenosphere increases baseplate motion during static loading in the reverse shoulder design. Although there was a general trend toward increased baseplate motion with increasing distance from the glenoid to the center of rotation, in vitro mechanical testing revealed no significant difference between the 7 glenosphere types tested, with average baseplate motion during 1000 load cycles ranging from 90 mum to 120 mum. Results from the finite element analysis strongly correlated with the in vitro mechanical testing. The magnitude of baseplate motion occurring in a modeled representation of bone under simulated physiologic loading conditions was similar for the 7 reverse shoulder glenoid components tested in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18328739     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  16 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Deltoid muscle activity in patients with reverse shoulder prosthesis at 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  F Pegreffi; A Pellegrini; P Paladini; G Merolla; G Belli; P U Velarde; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-10-30

Review 3.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

5.  Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; Joseph Choi; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

7.  3D CT scan-based study of glenoid morphology in Indian population: Clinical relevance in design of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prashant Meshram; Aditya Pawaskar; Aashay Kekatpure
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-06

8.  Influence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate design on torque and compression relationship.

Authors:  Miguel A Diaz; Jason E Hsu; Eric T Ricchetti; Grant E Garrigues; Sergio Gutierrez; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-04-28

9.  Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Soo-Won Chae; Soung-Yon Kim; Haea Lee; Joung-Ro Yon; Juneyoung Lee; Seung-Ho Han
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Impact of Modeling Assumptions on Stability Predictions in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mehul A Dharia; Jeffrey E Bischoff; David Schneider
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.