Literature DB >> 18308087

Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look?

Andrew J Portis1, Mark A Laliberte, Cindy Holtz, Wenjun Ma, Michael S Rosenberg, Carl A Bretzke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intraoperative decision making regarding the necessity of second-look nephroscopy after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
METHODS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed cooperatively by a urologist and radiologist equipped with a high-resolution C-arm. Ultrasonic lithotripsy was performed followed by thorough flexible nephroscopy and fluoroscopy. At conclusion patients were prospectively classified as radiologically and/or endoscopically stone free. If confident that complete stone clearance had been atraumatically achieved, a ureteral stent was placed. If there was suspicion of trauma or residual calculi, a nephrostomy tube was inserted. Postoperative CT was performed and allowed fragment classification as stone free, less than 2 mm, 2 to 4 mm, or 4 mm or greater.
RESULTS: Average stone dimensions were 640.2 +/- 412.5 mm2 in 39 consecutive renal units. Computed tomographic imaging demonstrated that 26 renal units (66.7%) were stone free after primary procedure, with 5 (12.8%), 5 (12.8%), and 3 (7.7%) having fragments less than 2 mm, 2 to 4 mm, and greater than 4 mm, respectively. Of the 34 renal units considered endoscopically and fluoroscopically stone free, postoperative CT demonstrated 9 with residual fragments, all less than 4 mm. Of the 5 renal units not considered radiologically and endoscopically stone free, 4 had fragments on CT. Nephrostomy tubes were avoided in 33 patients. This intraoperative decision was supported by negative predictive values of 100%, 88%, and 73% at postoperative CT fragment detection thresholds of 4 mm, 2 mm, and 0 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous fragment detection allows confident intraoperative decision making regarding the necessity of second-look nephroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18308087     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

1.  A Simulation-based, cognitive assessment of resident decision making during complex urinary catheterization scenarios.

Authors:  Jay N Nathwani; Katherine E Law; Anna K Witt; R D Ray; S M DiMarco; C M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Second-look nephroscopy after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Bodo E Knudsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-04

3.  Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Li Wang; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Marco Garofalo; Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Francesco Sanguedolce; Marco Borghesi; Christian Rocca; Chiara Del Prete; Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate; Alexandro Paccapelo; Giuseppe Martorana
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Stone free rates (SFRs) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); are we comparing apples with watermelons?

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Kaan Ozdedeli; Mete Cek
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

9.  Comparison of imaging modalities for detection of residual fragments and prediction of stone related events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Ilker Gokce; Eriz Ozden; Evren Suer; Basak Gulpinar; Omer Gulpınar; Semih Tangal
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Retrograde vs. antegrade fl exible nephroscopy for detection of residual fragments following PNL: A prospective study with computerized tomography control.

Authors:  Mehmet İlker Gökce; Omer Gülpinar; Arif Ibiş; Muratcan Karaburun; Eralp Kubilay; Evren Süer
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.