Literature DB >> 28010921

Digital breast tomosynthesis: Dose and image quality assessment.

A Maldera1, P De Marco2, P E Colombo3, D Origgi4, A Torresin3.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate how different acquisition geometries and reconstruction parameters affect the performance of four digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems (Senographe Essential - GE, Mammomat Inspiration - Siemens, Selenia Dimensions - Hologic and Amulet Innovality - Fujifilm) on the basis of a physical characterization. Average Glandular Dose (AGD) and image quality parameters such as in-plane/in-depth resolution, signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) and artefact spread function (ASF) were examined. Measured AGD values resulted below EUREF limits for 2D imaging. A large variability was recorded among the investigated systems: the mean dose ratio DBT/2D ranged between 1.1 and 1.9. In-plane resolution was in the range: 2.2mm-1-3.8mm-1 in chest wall-nipple direction. A worse resolution was found for all devices in tube travel direction. In-depth resolution improved with increasing scan angle but was also affected by the choice of reconstruction and post-processing algorithms. The highest z-resolution was provided by Siemens (50°, FWHM=2.3mm) followed by GE (25°, FWHM=2.8mm), while the Fujifilm HR showed the lowest one, despite its wide scan angle (40°, FWHM=4.1mm). The ASF was dependent on scan angle: smaller range systems showed wider ASF curves; however a clear relationship was not found between scan angle and ASF, due to the different post processing and reconstruction algorithms. SDNR analysis, performed on Fujifilm system, demonstrated that pixel binning improves detectability for a fixed dose/projection. In conclusion, we provide a performance comparison among four DBT systems under a clinical acquisition mode.
Copyright © 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Digital breast tomosynthesis; Image analysis; Image quality; Physical characterization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28010921     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  7 in total

1.  Technical evaluation of image quality in synthetic mammograms obtained from 15° and 40° digital breast tomosynthesis in a commercial system: a quantitative comparison.

Authors:  Patrizio Barca; Rocco Lamastra; Raffaele Maria Tucciariello; Antonio Traino; Carolina Marini; Giacomo Aringhieri; Davide Caramella; Maria Evelina Fantacci
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-23

2.  Radiochromic film dosimetry in synchrotron radiation breast computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Giovanni Mettivier; Marica Masi; Fulvia Arfelli; Luca Brombal; Pasquale Delogu; Francesca Di Lillo; Sandro Donato; Christian Fedon; Bruno Golosio; Piernicola Oliva; Luigi Rigon; Antonio Sarno; Angelo Taibi; Paolo Russo
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.616

3.  Characterization of the imaging settings in screening mammography using a tracking and reporting system: A multi-center and multi-vendor analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Barufaldi; Samantha P Zuckerman; Regina B Medeiros; Andrew D Maidment; Homero Schiabel
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Sergei Zolotarev; Inge Hillman; Konstantinos Karalis; Dzmitry Stsepankou; Valeriy Vengrinovich; Jürgen Hesser; Tony M Svahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz; Jonas Teuwen; Suzan Vreemann; Ramona W Bouwman; Ruben E van Engen; Nico Karssemeijer; Ritse M Mann; Albert Gubern-Merida; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Use of a Total Variation Minimization Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm to Evaluate Reduced Projections during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Yukio Koibuchi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  One view or two views for wide-angle tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography in the assessment setting?

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Pascal A T Baltzer; Panagiotis Kapetas; Ramona Woitek; Michael Weber; Federica Leone; Maria Bernathova; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.