Importance: The morphologic changes and their pathognomonic distribution in progressing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are not well understood. Objectives: To characterize the pathognomonic distribution and time course of morphologic patterns in AMD and to quantify changes distinctive for progression to macular neovascularization (MNV) and macular atrophy (MA). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumesfrom study participants with early or intermediate AMD in the fellow eye in the HARBOR (A Study of Ranibizumab Administered Monthly or on an As-needed Basis in Patients With Subfoveal Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration) trial. Patients underwent imaging monthly for 2 years (July 1, 2009, to August 31, 2012) following a standardized protocol. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2018, to January 21, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: To obtain topographic correspondence between patients and over time, all scans were mapped into a joint reference frame. The time of progression to MNV and MA was established, and drusen volumes and hyperreflective foci (HRF) volumes were automatically segmented in 3 dimensions using validated artificial intelligence algorithms. Topographically resolved population means of these markers were constructed by averaging quantified drusen and HRF maps in the patient subgroups. Results: Of 1097 patients enrolled in HARBOR, 518 (mean [SD] age, 78.1 [8.2] years; 309 [59.7%] female) had early or intermediate AMD in the fellow eye at baseline. During the 24-month follow-up period, 135 (26%) eyes developed MNV, 50 eyes (10%) developed MA, and 333 (64%) eyes did not progress to advanced AMD. Drusen and HRF had distinct topographic patterns. Mean drusen thickness at the fovea was 29.6 μm (95% CI, 20.2-39.0 μm) for eyes progressing to MNV, 17.2 μm (95% CI, 9.8-24.6 μm) for eyes progressing to MA, and 17.1 μm (95% CI, 12.5-21.7 μm) for eyes without disease progression. At 0.5-mm eccentricity, mean drusen thickness was 25.8 μm (95% CI, 19.1-32.5 μm) for eyes progressing to MNV, 21.7 μm (95% CI, 14.6-28.8 μm) for eyes progressing to MA, and 14.4 μm (95% CI, 11.2-17.6 μm) for eyes without disease progression. The mean HRF thickness at the foveal center was 0.072 μm (95% CI, 0-0.152 μm) for eyes progressing to MNV, 0.059 μm (95% CI, 0-0.126 μm) for eyes progressing to MA, and 0.044 μm (95% CI, 0.007-0.081) for eyes without disease progression. At 0.5-mm eccentricity, the largest mean HRF thickness was seen in eyes progressing to MA (0.227 μm; 95% CI, 0.104-0.349 μm) followed by eyes progressing to MNV (0.161 μm; 95% CI, 0.101-0.221 μm) and eyes without disease progression (0.085 μm; 95% CI, 0.058-0.112 μm). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, drusen and HRF represented imaging biomarkers of disease progression in AMD, demonstrating distinct topographic patterns over time that differed between eyes progressing to MNV, eyes progressing to MA, or eyes without disease progression. Automated localization and precise quantification of these factors may help to develop reliable methods of predicting future disease progression.
RCT Entities:
Importance: The morphologic changes and their pathognomonic distribution in progressing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are not well understood. Objectives: To characterize the pathognomonic distribution and time course of morphologic patterns in AMD and to quantify changes distinctive for progression to macular neovascularization (MNV) and macular atrophy (MA). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes from study participants with early or intermediate AMD in the fellow eye in the HARBOR (A Study of Ranibizumab Administered Monthly or on an As-needed Basis in Patients With Subfoveal Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration) trial. Patients underwent imaging monthly for 2 years (July 1, 2009, to August 31, 2012) following a standardized protocol. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2018, to January 21, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: To obtain topographic correspondence between patients and over time, all scans were mapped into a joint reference frame. The time of progression to MNV and MA was established, and drusen volumes and hyperreflective foci (HRF) volumes were automatically segmented in 3 dimensions using validated artificial intelligence algorithms. Topographically resolved population means of these markers were constructed by averaging quantified drusen and HRF maps in the patient subgroups. Results: Of 1097 patients enrolled in HARBOR, 518 (mean [SD] age, 78.1 [8.2] years; 309 [59.7%] female) had early or intermediate AMD in the fellow eye at baseline. During the 24-month follow-up period, 135 (26%) eyes developed MNV, 50 eyes (10%) developed MA, and 333 (64%) eyes did not progress to advanced AMD. Drusen and HRF had distinct topographic patterns. Mean drusen thickness at the fovea was 29.6 μm (95% CI, 20.2-39.0 μm) for eyes progressing to MNV, 17.2 μm (95% CI, 9.8-24.6 μm) for eyes progressing to MA, and 17.1 μm (95% CI, 12.5-21.7 μm) for eyes without disease progression. At 0.5-mm eccentricity, mean drusen thickness was 25.8 μm (95% CI, 19.1-32.5 μm) for eyes progressing to MNV, 21.7 μm (95% CI, 14.6-28.8 μm) for eyes progressing to MA, and 14.4 μm (95% CI, 11.2-17.6 μm) for eyes without disease progression. The mean HRF thickness at the foveal center was 0.072 μm (95% CI, 0-0.152 μm) for eyes progressing to MNV, 0.059 μm (95% CI, 0-0.126 μm) for eyes progressing to MA, and 0.044 μm (95% CI, 0.007-0.081) for eyes without disease progression. At 0.5-mm eccentricity, the largest mean HRF thickness was seen in eyes progressing to MA (0.227 μm; 95% CI, 0.104-0.349 μm) followed by eyes progressing to MNV (0.161 μm; 95% CI, 0.101-0.221 μm) and eyes without disease progression (0.085 μm; 95% CI, 0.058-0.112 μm). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, drusen and HRF represented imaging biomarkers of disease progression in AMD, demonstrating distinct topographic patterns over time that differed between eyes progressing to MNV, eyes progressing to MA, or eyes without disease progression. Automated localization and precise quantification of these factors may help to develop reliable methods of predicting future disease progression.
Authors: Wolf-Dieter Vogl; Sebastian M Waldstein; Bianca S Gerendas; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Georg Langs Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Robert P Finger; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Matthias Schmid; Gary S Rubin; Hannah Dunbar; Adnan Tufail; David P Crabb; Alison Binns; Clara I Sánchez; Philippe Margaron; Guillaume Normand; Mary K Durbin; Ulrich F O Luhmann; Parisa Zamiri; José Cunha-Vaz; Friedrich Asmus; Frank G Holz Journal: Ophthalmologica Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Frederick L Ferris; C P Wilkinson; Alan Bird; Usha Chakravarthy; Emily Chew; Karl Csaky; SriniVas R Sadda Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Matt Trinh; Michael Kalloniatis; David Alonso-Caneiro; Lisa Nivison-Smith Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 4.925
Authors: Janice Sutton; Martin J Menten; Sophie Riedl; Hrvoje Bogunović; Oliver Leingang; Philipp Anders; Ahmed M Hagag; Sebastian Waldstein; Amber Wilson; Angela J Cree; Ghislaine Traber; Lars G Fritsche; Hendrik Scholl; Daniel Rueckert; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Sobha Sivaprasad; Toby Prevost; Andrew Lotery Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Antonio Yaghy; Aaron Y Lee; Pearse A Keane; Tiarnan D L Keenan; Luisa S M Mendonca; Cecilia S Lee; Anne Marie Cairns; Joseph Carroll; Hao Chen; Julie Clark; Catherine A Cukras; Luis de Sisternes; Amitha Domalpally; Mary K Durbin; Kerry E Goetz; Felix Grassmann; Jonathan L Haines; Naoto Honda; Zhihong Jewel Hu; Christopher Mody; Luz D Orozco; Cynthia Owsley; Stephen Poor; Charles Reisman; Ramiro Ribeiro; Srinivas R Sadda; Sobha Sivaprasad; Giovanni Staurenghi; Daniel Sw Ting; Santa J Tumminia; Luca Zalunardo; Nadia K Waheed Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.770
Authors: Malini Veerappan Pasricha; Vincent Tai; Karim Sleiman; Katrina Winter; Stephanie J Chiu; Sina Farsiu; Sandra S Stinnett; Eleonora M Lad; Wai T Wong; Emily Y Chew; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2020-12-22
Authors: Pia Stockinger; Andreas Berlin; Daniel Kampik; Christine Schmitt; Jost Hillenkamp; Jeffrey D Messinger; Martina C Herwig-Carl; Thomas Ach Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 1.174
Authors: Avni P Finn; Maxwell Pistilli; Vincent Tai; Ebenezer Daniel; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Juan E Grunwald; Daniel F Martin; Glenn J Jaffe; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 5.258