Literature DB >> 28000623

Attenuation measuring ultrasound shearwave elastography and in vivo application in post-transplant liver patients.

Ivan Z Nenadic1, Bo Qiang, Matthew W Urban, Heng Zhao, William Sanchez, James F Greenleaf, Shigao Chen.   

Abstract

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography techniques are used to assess mechanical properties of soft tissues. Tissue stiffness is related to various pathologies such as fibrosis, loss of compliance, and cancer. One way to perform elastography is measuring shear wave velocity of propagating waves in tissue induced by intrinsic motion or an external source of vibration, and relating the shear wave velocity to tissue elasticity. All tissues are inherently viscoelastic and ignoring viscosity biases the velocity-based estimates of elasticity and ignores a potentially important parameter of tissue health. We present attenuation measuring ultrasound shearwave elastography (AMUSE), a technique that independently measures both shear wave velocity and attenuation in tissue and therefore allows characterization of viscoelasticity without using a rheological model. The theoretical basis for AMUSE is first derived and validated in finite element simulations. AMUSE is validated against the traditional methods for assessing shear wave velocity (phase gradient) and attenuation (amplitude decay) in tissue mimicking phantoms and excised tissue. The results agreed within one standard deviation. AMUSE was used to measure shear wave velocity and attenuation in 15 transplanted livers in patients with potential acute rejection, and the results were compared with the biopsy findings in a preliminary study. The comparison showed excellent agreement and suggests that AMUSE can be used to separate transplanted livers with acute rejection from livers with no rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28000623      PMCID: PMC5505633          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa4f6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  Update of the International Banff Schema for Liver Allograft Rejection: working recommendations for the histopathologic staging and reporting of chronic rejection. An International Panel.

Authors:  A Demetris; D Adams; C Bellamy; K Blakolmer; A Clouston; A P Dhillon; J Fung; A Gouw; B Gustafsson; H Haga; D Harrison; J Hart; S Hubscher; R Jaffe; U Khettry; C Lassman; K Lewin; O Martinez; Y Nakazawa; D Neil; O Pappo; M Parizhskaya; P Randhawa; S Rasoul-Rockenschaub; F Reinholt; M Reynes; M Robert; A Tsamandas; I Wanless; R Wiesner; A Wernerson; F Wrba; J Wyatt; H Yamabe
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  In vivo quantitative mapping of myocardial stiffening and transmural anisotropy during the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Mathieu Couade; Mathieu Pernot; Emmanuel Messas; Alain Bel; Maguette Ba; Albert Hagege; Mathias Fink; Mickael Tanter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Gennisson; Thomas Deffieux; Emilie Macé; Gabriel Montaldo; Mathias Fink; Mickaël Tanter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  An analytic, Fourier domain description of shear wave propagation in a viscoelastic medium using asymmetric Gaussian sources.

Authors:  Ned C Rouze; Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography.

Authors:  Gabriel Montaldo; Mickaël Tanter; Jérémy Bercoff; Nicolas Benech; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography.

Authors:  Patrick Asbach; Dieter Klatt; Uwe Hamhaber; Jürgen Braun; Rajan Somasundaram; Bernd Hamm; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Phase Aberration and Attenuation Effects on Acoustic Radiation Force-Based Shear Wave Generation.

Authors:  Carolina Amador Carrascal; Sara Aristizabal; James F Greenleaf; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Improvement of Shear Wave Motion Detection Using Harmonic Imaging in Healthy Human Liver.

Authors:  Carolina Amador; Pengfei Song; Duane D Meixner; Shigao Chen; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Shear wave elastography in the evaluation of rejection or recurrent hepatitis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jae Young Lee; Hyun Sik Woo; Mi Hye Yu; Eun Sun Lee; Ijin Joo; Kyoung Bun Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Yoon Jin Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  23 in total

1.  Characterization of Viscoelastic Materials Using Group Shear Wave Speeds.

Authors:  Ned C Rouze; Yufeng Deng; Courtney A Trutna; Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Accounting for the Spatial Observation Window in the 2-D Fourier Transform Analysis of Shear Wave Attenuation.

Authors:  Ned C Rouze; Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Shear wave propagation in viscoelastic media: validation of an approximate forward model.

Authors:  Fernando Zvietcovich; Natalie Baddour; Jannick P Rolland; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Application of a forward model of axisymmetric shear wave propagation in viscoelastic media to shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Sanjay S Yengul; Paul E Barbone; Bruno Madore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Measurement of Viscoelastic Material Model Parameters Using Fractional Derivative Group Shear Wave Speeds in Simulation and Phantom Data.

Authors:  Courtney A Trutna; Ned C Rouze; Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Impact of Acoustic Radiation Force Excitation Geometry on Shear Wave Dispersion and Attenuation Estimates.

Authors:  Samantha L Lipman; Ned C Rouze; Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Adaptive attenuation correction during H-scan ultrasound imaging using K-means clustering.

Authors:  Haowei Tai; Mawia Khairalseed; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Two-Point Frequency Shift Method for Shear Wave Attenuation Measurement.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Dispersion in Tissue-Mimicking Gels Measured with Shear Wave Elastography and Torsional Vibration Rheometry.

Authors:  Sanjay S Yengul; Paul E Barbone; Bruno Madore
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Robust Phase Velocity Dispersion Estimation of Viscoelastic Materials Used for Medical Applications Based on the Multiple Signal Classification Method.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Bo Qiang; Pengfei Song; Carolina Amador Carrascal; Shigao Chen; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.