Literature DB >> 28000413

Bacteriostatic behavior of surface modulated silicon nitride in comparison to polyetheretherketone and titanium.

Ryan M Bock1, Erin N Jones1, Darin A Ray1, B Sonny Bal1,2, Giuseppe Pezzotti3, Bryan J McEntire1.   

Abstract

Perioperative and latent infections are leading causes of revision surgery for orthopaedic devices resulting in significant increased patient care, comorbidities, and attendant costs. Identifying biomaterial surfaces that inherently resist biofilm adhesion and bacterial expression is an important emerging strategy in addressing implant-related infections. This in vitro study was designed to compare biofilm formation on three biomaterials commonly employed in spinal fusion surgery-silicon nitride (Si3 N4 ), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and a titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-ELI) -using one gram-positive and one gram-negative bacterial species. Disc samples from various surface treated Si3 N4 , PEEK, and Ti6Al4V were inoculated with 105 CFU/mm2 Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC®14990™) or Escherichia coli (ATCC® 25922™) and cultured in PBS, 7% glucose, and 10% human plasma for 24 and 48 h, followed by retrieval and rinsing. Vortexed solutions were diluted, plated, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 to 48 h. Colony forming units (CFU/mm2 ) were determined using applicable dilution factors and surface areas. A two-tailed, heteroscedastic Student's t-test (95% confidence) was used to determine statistical significance. The various Si3 N4 samples showed the most favorable bacterial resistance for both bacilli tested. The mechanisms for the bacteriostatic behavior of Si3 N4 are likely due to multivariate surface effects including submicron-topography, negative charging, and chemical interactions which form peroxynitrite (an oxidative agent). Si3 N4 is a new biomaterial with the apparent potential to inhibit biofilm formation.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 1521-1534, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-infective; polyetheretherketone; silicon nitride; surface treatments; titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28000413     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  18 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a silicon nitride cage demonstrates early radiographic fusion.

Authors:  Mitchell T Gray; Kyle P Davis; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal; Micah W Smith
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

3.  Silicon nitride enhances osteoprogenitor cell growth and differentiation via increased surface energy and formation of amide and nanocrystalline HA for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Kamal R Awad; Neelam Ahuja; Ami Shah; Henry Tran; Pranesh B Aswath; Marco Brotto; Venu Varanasi
Journal:  Med Devices Sens       Date:  2019-05-06

Review 4.  Silicon Nitride as a Biomedical Material: An Overview.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Du; Seunghun S Lee; Gurdial Blugan; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Surface topography of silicon nitride affects antimicrobial and osseointegrative properties of tibial implants in a murine model.

Authors:  Masahiro Ishikawa; Karen L de Mesy Bentley; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal; Edward M Schwarz; Chao Xie
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Clinical outcomes for lumbar fusion using silicon nitride versus other biomaterials.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

7.  A single center retrospective clinical evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing allograft spacers to silicon nitride cages.

Authors:  Micah W Smith; Daniel R Romano; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

8.  Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

9.  Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans biofilms adherence to PEEK and titanium-alloy prosthetic spine devices.

Authors:  Luiz Gustavo Dal Oglio da Rocha; Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro; Ana Paula de Andrade; Geiziane Aparecida Gonçalves; Letícia Kraft; Juliette Cieslinski; Paula Hansen Suss; Felipe Francisco Tuon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-07-08

10.  Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.

Authors:  Bryan J McEntire; Greg Maslin; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.