Angelena Crown1,2, Nicketti Handy3, Christina Weed3, Ruby Laskin3, Flavio G Rocha3, Janie Grumley4. 1. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Breast Surgery, True Family Women's Cancer Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Margie Peterson Breast Center, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA. janie.grumley@providence.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Traditional indications for mastectomy include multiple ipsilateral lesions and/or disease spanning ≥ 5 cm. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases breast conservation but does not improve survival. We hypothesized that oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPS) may allow for breast conservation while providing full staging and tumor profiling information to guide systemic therapy decisions, thereby permitting more judicious chemotherapy use. METHODS: This was an observational cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer with multiple lesions and/or disease spanning ≥ 5 cm who underwent OPS from 2012 to 2018. Clinicopathologic features, mastectomy rate, chemotherapy use, and recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients were identified. Average disease span was 62.8 ± 20.1 mm, with an average of 2.9 lesions (range 1-13). 'No ink on tumor' was achieved at the index operation in 80 patients; 13 patients underwent completion mastectomy to achieve adequate margins. Eighty-one patients completed radiation therapy. Breast conservation was possible in 50/58 (86%) patients who did not receive chemotherapy. Forty-two patients received chemotherapy (8 neoadjuvant, 34 adjuvant), of whom 37 (88%) achieved breast conservation. Twenty-six patients with high-risk features received adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotype DX testing demonstrated the need for chemotherapy in an additional eight patients. After a median follow-up of 40 months, four patients had a local recurrence, including two who declined radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: OPS can facilitate breast conservation in most patients with traditional indications for mastectomy. Additionally, OPS may reduce unnecessary chemotherapy, especially in patients who qualify for Oncotype DX testing. Further study evaluating long-term oncologic and cosmetic outcomes is warranted.
INTRODUCTION: Traditional indications for mastectomy include multiple ipsilateral lesions and/or disease spanning ≥ 5 cm. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases breast conservation but does not improve survival. We hypothesized that oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPS) may allow for breast conservation while providing full staging and tumor profiling information to guide systemic therapy decisions, thereby permitting more judicious chemotherapy use. METHODS: This was an observational cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer with multiple lesions and/or disease spanning ≥ 5 cm who underwent OPS from 2012 to 2018. Clinicopathologic features, mastectomy rate, chemotherapy use, and recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients were identified. Average disease span was 62.8 ± 20.1 mm, with an average of 2.9 lesions (range 1-13). 'No ink on tumor' was achieved at the index operation in 80 patients; 13 patients underwent completion mastectomy to achieve adequate margins. Eighty-one patients completed radiation therapy. Breast conservation was possible in 50/58 (86%) patients who did not receive chemotherapy. Forty-two patients received chemotherapy (8 neoadjuvant, 34 adjuvant), of whom 37 (88%) achieved breast conservation. Twenty-six patients with high-risk features received adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotype DX testing demonstrated the need for chemotherapy in an additional eight patients. After a median follow-up of 40 months, four patients had a local recurrence, including two who declined radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: OPS can facilitate breast conservation in most patients with traditional indications for mastectomy. Additionally, OPS may reduce unnecessary chemotherapy, especially in patients who qualify for Oncotype DX testing. Further study evaluating long-term oncologic and cosmetic outcomes is warranted.
Authors: Irene L Wapnir; Stewart J Anderson; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Charles E Geyer; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Bernard Fisher; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A S Lichter; M E Lippman; D N Danforth; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; E deMoss; H D MacDonald; C M Reichert; M Merino; S M Swain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Meghan R Flanagan; Emily C Zabor; Anya Romanoff; Sarah Fuzesi; Michelle Stempel; Babak J Mehrara; Monica Morrow; Andrea L Pusic; Mary L Gemignani Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Stewart J Anderson; Irene Wapnir; James J Dignam; Bernard Fisher; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: U Veronesi; R Saccozzi; M Del Vecchio; A Banfi; C Clemente; M De Lena; G Gallus; M Greco; A Luini; E Marubini; G Muscolino; F Rilke; B Salvadori; A Zecchini; R Zucali Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1981-07-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Natalie D Chand; Victoria Browne; Nirmala Paramanathan; Lashan J Peiris; Siobhan A Laws; Richard M Rainsbury Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2017-07-24