Jong-Ho Cheun1,2, Young Joo Lee3,4, Jun-Hee Lee5,6, Yungil Shin3, Jung Whan Chun3, Soo Yeon Baek3, Hong-Kyu Kim1, Han-Byoel Lee1, Jonghan Yu5, Byung Joo Chae5, Wonshik Han1, Jeong Eon Lee7. 1. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. 4. Department of Surgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. 5. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 6. Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul, Seoul, South Korea. 7. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. jeongeon.lee@samsung.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The definition of "no tumor on ink" is generally applied for clear resection margin (RM) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, few studies reported the effect of RM in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We investigated the association between RM status and survival outcomes for those who underwent BCS after NAC for breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 2,803 patients who underwent BCS and whole-breast irradiation after NAC between January 2008 and December 2016 from three institutions in South Korea. RESULTS: The 786 patients in the pathologic complete response group (RpCR) had significantly longer local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) than the 1,949 patients in clear or close RM and non-pCR group (R0) and the 68 patients in involved RM and non-pCR group (R1) (vs. R0, p = 0.001; vs. R1, p = 0.049). Patients in R0 showed no benefit in LRFS compared to R1 on both log-rank test (HR = 1.20; 95% C.I., 0.49-2.93; p = 0.692) and Cox regression analysis (HR = 2.05; 95% C.I., 0.64-6.58; p = 0.227). Subgroup analysis according to tumor subtypes revealed that there was no significant difference in LRFS, distant metastasis-free survival, and recurrence-free survival between the R0 and R1 group. Additionally, among 286 patients with pCR with residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) alone, RM status was not significantly associated with LRFS. CONCLUSION: Clear RM of specimen does not have benefit on LRFS after NAC. Additionally, for the patients showing pCR with residual DCIS in the breast, margin involvement also did not affect the risk of local recurrence.
PURPOSE: The definition of "no tumor on ink" is generally applied for clear resection margin (RM) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, few studies reported the effect of RM in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We investigated the association between RM status and survival outcomes for those who underwent BCS after NAC for breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 2,803 patients who underwent BCS and whole-breast irradiation after NAC between January 2008 and December 2016 from three institutions in South Korea. RESULTS: The 786 patients in the pathologic complete response group (RpCR) had significantly longer local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) than the 1,949 patients in clear or close RM and non-pCR group (R0) and the 68 patients in involved RM and non-pCR group (R1) (vs. R0, p = 0.001; vs. R1, p = 0.049). Patients in R0 showed no benefit in LRFS compared to R1 on both log-rank test (HR = 1.20; 95% C.I., 0.49-2.93; p = 0.692) and Cox regression analysis (HR = 2.05; 95% C.I., 0.64-6.58; p = 0.227). Subgroup analysis according to tumor subtypes revealed that there was no significant difference in LRFS, distant metastasis-free survival, and recurrence-free survival between the R0 and R1 group. Additionally, among 286 patients with pCR with residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) alone, RM status was not significantly associated with LRFS. CONCLUSION: Clear RM of specimen does not have benefit on LRFS after NAC. Additionally, for the patients showing pCR with residual DCIS in the breast, margin involvement also did not affect the risk of local recurrence.
Authors: F Cardoso; S Kyriakides; S Ohno; F Penault-Llorca; P Poortmans; I T Rubio; S Zackrisson; E Senkus Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ramon Colomer; Cristina Saura; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira; Tomás Pascual; Isabel T Rubio; Octavio Burgués; Lourdes Marcos; César A Rodríguez; Miguel Martín; Ana Lluch Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-02-01
Authors: Carlos A Puig; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Day; Elizabeth B Habermann; Judy C Boughey Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Andrea L Russo; Nils D Arvold; Andrzej Niemierko; Nathan Wong; Julia S Wong; Jennifer R Bellon; Rinaa S Punglia; Mehra Golshan; Susan L Troyan; Jane E Brock; Jay R Harris Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: C C Park; M Mitsumori; A Nixon; A Recht; J Connolly; R Gelman; B Silver; S Hetelekidis; A Abner; J R Harris; S J Schnitt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Meena S Moran; Stuart J Schnitt; Armando E Giuliano; Jay R Harris; Seema A Khan; Janet Horton; Suzanne Klimberg; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Gary Freedman; Nehmat Houssami; Peggy L Johnson; Monica Morrow Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Allen M Chen; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Howard D Thames; Mary Jane Oswald; Elesyia D Outlaw; Eric A Strom; Marsha D McNeese; Henry M Kuerer; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary; Fredrick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Aysegul A Sahin; George H Perkins; Naomi R Schechter; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Priya Rastogi; Stewart J Anderson; Harry D Bear; Charles E Geyer; Morton S Kahlenberg; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; James L Hoehn; Victor G Vogel; Shaker R Dakhil; Deimante Tamkus; Karen M King; Eduardo R Pajon; Mary Johanna Wright; Jean Robert; Soonmyung Paik; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544