| Literature DB >> 27999268 |
Hui-Yun Peng1, Qiong-Fang Yu2, Wei Shen3, Cheng-Ming Guo4, Zhen Li5, Xiao-Yan Zhou6, Nan-Jin Zhou7, Wei-Ping Min8, Dian Gao9.
Abstract
The engulfment and cell motility (ELMOs) family of proteins plays a crucial role in tumor cell migration and invasion. However, the function of ELMO3 is poorly defined. To elucidate its role in the development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC), we examined the expression of ELMO3 in 45 cases of paired CRC tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of the knockdown of ELMO3 on cell proliferation, cell cycle, migration, invasion and F-actin polymerization in HCT116 cells. The result shows that the expression of ELMO3 in CRC tissues was significantly increased in comparison to the adjacent normal colorectal tissues. Moreover, this overexpression was associated with tumor size (p = 0.007), tumor differentiation (p = 0.001), depth of invasion (p = 0.009), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.003), distant metastasis (p = 0.013) and tumor, node, metastasis (TNM)-based classification (p = 0.000). In in vitro experiments, the silencing of ELMO3 inhibited cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and F-actin polymerization, and induced Gap 1 (G1) phase cell cycle arrest. Our study demonstrates that ELMO3 is involved in the processes of growth, invasion and metastasis of CRC, and could be used a potential molecular diagnostic tool or therapy target of CRC.Entities:
Keywords: ELMO; colorectal cancer; engulfment and cell mobility; invasion; metastasis; proliferation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27999268 PMCID: PMC5187919 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17122119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The mRNA and protein levels of ELMO3 in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and adjacent normal tissues: (A) Real-time quantitative PCR was used to detect the ELMO3 mRNA expression level in primary tumors (T) and matched adjacent normal tissues (N) in CRC patients. LNM (+): patients with lymph node metastasis; LNM (−): patients without lymph node metastasis. β-actin was used as a reference gene to normalize ELMO3 expression. The 2–ΔΔ method was used to calculate the relative expression ratio. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) and (B) Western blot analysis was used to determined protein level of ELMO3. The statistical analysis was performed by Analysis of variance (ANOVA). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2Immunolocalization of ELMO3 in primary CRC tumor tissues (T) and adjacent normal tissues (N): (A) The examination was carried out using immunohistochemical staining. LNM (+): patients with lymph node metastasis; LNM (−): patients without lymph node metastasis. Arrows indicate the positive staining. The representative photographs are shown at 200× magnification and (B) The statistical analysis was performed using an ANOVA. ** p < 0.01.
Statistics of staining scores of ELMO3 in CRC tissues.
| Groups | N | ELMO3 Immunoreactivity Score | Positive Rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − | + | ++ | +++ | |||
| Tumor | 45 | 5 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 88.89% ** |
| Normal | 45 | 28 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 37.78% |
** p < 0.01.
Association analysis of ELMO3 expression with clinicopathological parameters of CRC patients.
| Clinical Parameter | ELMO3 Immunoreactivity Score | N | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − | + | ++ | +++ | |||
| Gender | 0.883 † | |||||
| Male | 5 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 27 | |
| Female | 0 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 18 | |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≤60 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 25 | 0.094 † |
| >60 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 20 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.007 † | |||||
| ≤4.0 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 26 | |
| >4.0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 19 | |
| Differentiation | 0.001 ‡ | |||||
| High | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | |
| Moderate | 1 | 5 | 10 | 12 | 28 | |
| Poor | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | |
| Depth of invasion | 0.009 † | |||||
| T1 + T2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |
| T3 + T4 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 18 | 35 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.003 † | |||||
| No | 5 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 33 | |
| Yes | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | |
| Distant metastasis | 0.013 † | |||||
| No | 5 | 9 | 12 | 14 | 40 | |
| Yes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| TNM classification | 0.000 † | |||||
| I + II | 5 | 9 | 9 | 7 | ||
| III + IV | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | ||
| Lymph node positive number | 0.003 † | |||||
| <1 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 33 | |
| ≥1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | |
† statistical analysis was performed by the Mann–Whitney U test; ‡ statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal–Wallis H test.
Figure 3Knockdown of ELMO3 suppressed the proliferation of HCT116 cells. (A) The inhibition efficiency of the candidate ELMO3 siRNAs was determined by Western blot analysis. β-actin was used as a loading control. The result shows that siELMO3-3 had the highest silencing efficiency; (B) An MTS assay determined the effect of silencing ELMO3 on the proliferation capacities of HCT116 cells. NC represents negative control group. Values represent the mean ± SD of the absorbance at various time points (n = 6, analysis of variance of factorial design). ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Knockdown of ELMO3 arrested the cell cycle of HCT116 cells at G1 phage. (A) The cell cycle distribution of HCT116 cells was detected by flow cytometry and (B) Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 5Knockdown of ELMO3 inhibited the migration and invasion of HCT116 cells. (A) The wound healing assay was carried out to examine the cell motility rates; (B) The Transwell assay was performed to assess cell migration potential; and (C) The matrigel Transwell assay was performed to assess cell invasion potential. The representative photographs are shown at 40× magnification. The statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 6Knockdown of ELMO3 inhibited the F-actin polymerization of HCT116 cells. The cytoskeleton and nuclei were stained with FITC-phalloidin and DAPI. The fluorescent signals of F-actin, labeled white arrows, were detected on the plasma membrane in the NC and Control groups. The representative photographs are shown at 400× magnification.