Literature DB >> 20304247

Colorectal cancer.

David Cunningham1, Wendy Atkin, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Henry T Lynch, Bruce Minsky, Bernard Nordlinger, Naureen Starling.   

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in colorectal cancer in the past decade. Screening, used to identify individuals at an early stage, has improved outcome. There is greater understanding of the genetic basis of inherited colorectal cancer and identification of patients at risk. Optimisation of surgery for patients with localised disease has had a major effect on survival at 5 years and 10 years. For rectal cancer, identification of patients at greatest risk of local failure is important in the selection of patients for preoperative chemoradiation, a strategy proven to improve outcomes in these patients. Stringent postoperative follow-up helps the early identification of potentially radically treatable oligometastatic disease and improves long-term survival. Treatment with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine for colon and rectal cancers further improves survival, more so in stage III than in stage II disease, and oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy is now routinely used for stage III disease, although efficacy must be carefully balanced against toxicity. In stage II disease, molecular markers such as microsatellite instability might help select patients for treatment. The integration of targeted treatments with conventional cytotoxic drugs has expanded the treatment of metastatic disease resulting in incremental survival gains. However, biomarker development is essential to aid selection of patients likely to respond to therapy, thereby rationalising treatments and improving outcomes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20304247     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60353-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  609 in total

Review 1.  Cell-Free DNA in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karen-Lise G Spindler; Anders K Boysen; Niels Pallisgård; Julia S Johansen; Josep Tabernero; Morten M Sørensen; Benny V Jensen; Torben F Hansen; David Sefrioui; Rikke F Andersen; Ivan Brandslund; Anders Jakobsen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Aneuploid Cell Survival Relies upon Sphingolipid Homeostasis.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Tang; Hui Yuwen; Kaiying Wang; Peter M Bruno; Kevin Bullock; Amy Deik; Stefano Santaguida; Marianna Trakala; Sarah J Pfau; Na Zhong; Tao Huang; Lan Wang; Clary B Clish; Michael T Hemann; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Genetic polymorphisms in MicroRNA-related genes as predictors of clinical outcomes in colorectal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Moubin Lin; Jian Gu; Cathy Eng; Lee M Ellis; Michelle A Hildebrandt; Jie Lin; Maosheng Huang; George A Calin; Dingzhi Wang; Raymond N Dubois; Ernest T Hawk; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  A phase II study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab and cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nan Soon Wong; Nishan H Fernando; Andrew B Nixon; Stephanie Cushman; Mebea Aklilu; Johanna C Bendell; Michael A Morse; Gerard C Blobe; Jill Ashton; Herbert Pang; Herbert I Hurwitz
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  PDCD4 nuclear loss inversely correlates with miR-21 levels in colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Matteo Fassan; Marco Pizzi; Luciano Giacomelli; Claudia Mescoli; Kathrin Ludwig; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Massimo Rugge
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeru Shiroiwa; Yoshiharu Motoo; Kiichiro Tsutani
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Guanylyl cyclase C as a biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Terry Hyslop; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

9.  AC133 expression associated with poor prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaofang Ying; Jiangxue Wu; Xiangqi Meng; Yufang Zuo; Qing Xia; Jinou Chen; Yanfen Feng; Ranyi Liu; Liren Li; Wenlin Huang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Intestinal cell proliferation and senescence are regulated by receptor guanylyl cyclase C and p21.

Authors:  Nirmalya Basu; Sayanti Saha; Imran Khan; Subbaraya G Ramachandra; Sandhya S Visweswariah
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.