Literature DB >> 24573555

Repeatability of quantitative FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in recurrent ovarian carcinoma: test-retest measurements for tumor FDG uptake, diameter, and volume.

Andrea G Rockall1, Norbert Avril2, Raymond Lam2, Robert Iannone2, P David Mozley2, Christine Parkinson3, Donald Bergstrom2, Evis Sala2, Shah-Jalal Sarker2, Iain A McNeish3, James D Brenton4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Repeatability of baseline FDG-PET/CT measurements has not been tested in ovarian cancer. This dual-center, prospective study assessed variation in tumor 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake, tumor diameter, and tumor volume from sequential FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients underwent two pretreatment baseline FDG-PET/CT (n = 21) and CECT (n = 20) at two clinical sites with different PET/CT instruments. Patients were included if they had at least one target lesion in the abdomen with a standardized uptake value (SUV) maximum (SUVmax) of ≥ 2.5 and a long axis diameter of ≥ 15 mm. Two independent reading methods were used to evaluate repeatability of tumor diameter and SUV uptake: on site and at an imaging clinical research organization (CRO). Tumor volume reads were only performed by CRO. In each reading set, target lesions were independently measured on sequential imaging.
RESULTS: Median time between FDG-PET/CT was two days (range 1-7). For site reads, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) for SUVmean, SUVmax, and tumor diameter were 0.95, 0.94, and 0.99, respectively. Repeatability coefficients were 16.3%, 17.3%, and 8.8% for SUVmean, SUVmax, and tumor diameter, respectively. Similar results were observed for CRO reads. Tumor volume CCC was 0.99 with a repeatability coefficient of 28.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: There was excellent test-retest repeatability for FDG-PET/CT quantitative measurements across two sites and two independent reading methods. Cutoff values for determining change in SUVmean, SUVmax, and tumor volume establish limits to determine metabolic and/or volumetric response to treatment in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24573555      PMCID: PMC5152730          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

1.  Lung cancer: computerized quantification of tumor response--initial results.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Chaya S Moskowitz; Michelle S Ginsberg; Naiyer A Rizvi; Mark G Kris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a multicenter phase I study of patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Linda M Velasquez; Ronald Boellaard; Georgia Kollia; Wendy Hayes; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Susan M Galbraith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Randomized phase II placebo-controlled trial of maintenance therapy using the oral triple angiokinase inhibitor BIBF 1120 after chemotherapy for relapsed ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan A Ledermann; Allan Hackshaw; Stan Kaye; Gordon Jayson; Hani Gabra; Iain McNeish; Helena Earl; Tim Perren; Martin Gore; Mojca Persic; Malcolm Adams; Lindsay James; Graham Temple; Michael Merger; Gordon Rustin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET.

Authors:  W A Weber; S I Ziegler; R Thödtmann; A R Hanauske; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG uptake measurements in tumors: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Adrianus J de Langen; Andrew Vincent; Linda M Velasquez; Harm van Tinteren; Ronald Boellaard; Lalitha K Shankar; Maarten Boers; Egbert F Smit; Sigrid Stroobants; Wolfgang A Weber; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Staging and monitoring in the treatment of lymphomas.

Authors:  B Dupas; K Augeul-Meunier; E Frampas; C Bodet-Milin; T Gastinne; S Le Gouill
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.026

7.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Methods to monitor response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Corneline J Hoekstra; Otto S Hoekstra; Sigrid G Stroobants; Johan Vansteenkiste; Johan Nuyts; Egbert F Smit; Maarten Boers; Jos W R Twisk; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  The clinical viewpoint: definitions, limitations of RECIST, practical considerations of measurement.

Authors:  Liza C Villaruz; Mark A Socinski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data.

Authors:  M P Coleman; D Forman; H Bryant; J Butler; B Rachet; C Maringe; U Nur; E Tracey; M Coory; J Hatcher; C E McGahan; D Turner; L Marrett; M L Gjerstorff; T B Johannesen; J Adolfsson; M Lambe; G Lawrence; D Meechan; E J Morris; R Middleton; J Steward; M A Richards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  18 in total

1.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective Assessment in 2 Multicenter Trials.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Constantine A Gatsonis; P David Mozley; Lucy G Hanna; Anthony F Shields; Denise R Aberle; Ramaswamy Govindan; Drew A Torigian; Joel S Karp; Jian Q Michael Yu; Rathan M Subramaniam; Robert A Halvorsen; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Quantitation of Cancer Treatment Response by 18F-FDG PET/CT: Multicenter Assessment of Measurement Variability.

Authors:  Joo Hyun O; Heather Jacene; Brandon Luber; Hao Wang; Minh-Huy Huynh; Jeffrey P Leal; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Reproducibility of (18)F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR.

Authors:  J H Rasmussen; B M Fischer; M C Aznar; A E Hansen; I R Vogelius; J Löfgren; F L Andersen; A Loft; A Kjaer; L Højgaard; L Specht
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Christopher Riedl; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in 18F-FDG PET: An Analysis of Data from Two Prospective Multicenter Trials.

Authors:  Frank Hofheinz; Ivayla Apostolova; Liane Oehme; Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rathan M Subramaniam; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  18F-FDG-PET/CT based total metabolic tumor volume change during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tuulia Vallius; Johanna Hynninen; Jukka Kemppainen; Victor Alves; Kari Auranen; Jaakko Matomäki; Sinikka Oksa; Johanna Virtanen; Seija Grénman; Annika Auranen; Marko Seppänen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Murine model for non-invasive imaging to detect and monitor ovarian cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Natalia J Sumi; Eydis Lima; John Pizzonia; Sean P Orton; Vinicius Craveiro; Wonduk Joo; Jennie C Holmberg; Marta Gurrea; Yang Yang-Hartwich; Ayesha Alvero; Gil Mor
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Effects of fasting on serial measurements of hyperpolarized [1-(13) C]pyruvate metabolism in tumors.

Authors:  Eva M Serrao; Tiago B Rodrigues; Ferdia A Gallagher; Mikko I Kettunen; Brett W C Kennedy; Sarah L Vowler; Keith A Burling; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.