Literature DB >> 27990035

Efficient Estimation of the Cox Model With Auxiliary Subgroup Survival Information.

Chiung-Yu Huang1, Jing Qin2, Huei-Ting Tsai3.   

Abstract

With the rapidly increasing availability of data in the public domain, combining information from different sources to infer about associations or differences of interest has become an emerging challenge to researchers. This paper presents a novel approach to improve efficiency in estimating the survival time distribution by synthesizing information from the individual-level data with t-year survival probabilities from external sources such as disease registries. While disease registries provide accurate and reliable overall survival statistics for the disease population, critical pieces of information that influence both choice of treatment and clinical outcomes usually are not available in the registry database. To combine with the published information, we propose to summarize the external survival information via a system of nonlinear population moments and estimate the survival time model using empirical likelihood methods. The proposed approach is more flexible than the conventional meta-analysis in the sense that it can automatically combine survival information for different subgroups and the information may be derived from different studies. Moreover, an extended estimator that allows for a different baseline risk in the aggregate data is also studied. Empirical likelihood ratio tests are proposed to examine whether the auxiliary survival information is consistent with the individual-level data. Simulation studies show that the proposed estimators yield a substantial gain in efficiency over the conventional partial likelihood approach. Two sets of data analysis are conducted to illustrate the methods and theory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Information synthesis; Meta-analysis; SEER cancer registries; Subgroup analysis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27990035      PMCID: PMC5157123          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1044090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  7 in total

1.  Generalised Linear Models Incorporating Population Level Information: An Empirical Likelihood Based Approach.

Authors:  Sanjay Chaudhuri; Mark S Handcock; Michael S Rendall
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Efficacy of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy vs conventional continuous androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huei-Ting Tsai; David F Penson; Kepher H Makambi; John H Lynch; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Aggregate-data estimation of an individual patient data linear random effects meta-analysis with a patient covariate-treatment interaction term.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kovalchik
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Estimating Risk with Time-to-Event Data: An Application to the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Dandan Liu; Yingye Zheng; Ross L Prentice; Li Hsu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Catherine M Tangen; Donna L Berry; Celestia S Higano; E David Crawford; Glenn Liu; George Wilding; Stephen Prescott; Subramanian Kanaga Sundaram; Eric Jay Small; Nancy Ann Dawson; Bryan J Donnelly; Peter M Venner; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Paul F Schellhammer; David I Quinn; Derek Raghavan; Benjamin Ely; Carol M Moinpour; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data.

Authors:  M C Simmonds; J P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Additive hazards model with auxiliary subgroup survival information.

Authors:  Jie He; Hui Li; Shumei Zhang; Xiaogang Duan
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Combining primary cohort data with external aggregate information without assuming comparability.

Authors:  Ziqi Chen; Jing Ning; Yu Shen; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 1.701

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.