Literature DB >> 25018574

Estimating Risk with Time-to-Event Data: An Application to the Women's Health Initiative.

Dandan Liu1, Yingye Zheng2, Ross L Prentice2, Li Hsu2.   

Abstract

Accurate and individualized risk prediction is critical for population control of chronic diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. Large cohort studies provide valuable resources for building risk prediction models, as the risk factors are collected at the baseline and subjects are followed over time until disease occurrence or termination of the study. However, for rare diseases the baseline risk may not be estimated reliably based on cohort data only, due to sparse events. In this paper, we propose to make use of external information to improve efficiency for estimating time-dependent absolute risk. We derive the relationship between external disease incidence rates and the baseline risk, and incorporate the external disease incidence information into estimation of absolute risks, while allowing for potential difference of disease incidence rates between cohort and external sources. The asymptotic properties, namely, uniform consistency and weak convergence, of the proposed estimators are established. Simulation results show that the proposed estimator for absolute risk is more efficient than that based on the Breslow estimator, which does not utilize external disease incidence rates. A large cohort study, the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, is used to illustrate the proposed method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  absolute risk; attributable risk; cohort data; colorectal cancer; external disease incidence rate

Year:  2014        PMID: 25018574      PMCID: PMC4091861          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.881739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  5 in total

1.  Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data.

Authors:  P Bruzzi; S B Green; D P Byar; L A Brinton; C Schairer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density.

Authors:  Jinbo Chen; David Pee; Rajeev Ayyagari; Barry Graubard; Catherine Schairer; Celia Byrne; Jacques Benichou; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Personalized estimates of breast cancer risk in clinical practice and public health.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility.

Authors:  Andrew N Freedman; Martha L Slattery; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Gordon Willis; Bette J Cann; David Pee; Mitchell H Gail; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Efficient Estimation of the Cox Model With Auxiliary Subgroup Survival Information.

Authors:  Chiung-Yu Huang; Jing Qin; Huei-Ting Tsai
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Re-calibrating pure risk integrating individual data from two-phase studies with external summary statistics.

Authors:  Jiayin Zheng; Yingye Zheng; Li Hsu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Robust Dynamic Risk Prediction with Longitudinal Studies.

Authors:  Qian M Zhou; Wei Dai; Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Stat Theory Relat Fields       Date:  2017-11-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.