Literature DB >> 17195960

Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data.

M C Simmonds1, J P T Higgins.   

Abstract

Meta-analyses of clinical trials are increasingly seeking to go beyond estimating the effect of a treatment and may also aim to investigate the effect of other covariates and how they alter treatment effectiveness. This requires the estimation of treatment-covariate interactions. Meta-regression can be used to estimate such interactions using published data, but it is known to lack statistical power, and is prone to bias.The use of individual patient data can improve estimation of such interactions, among other benefits, but it can be difficult and time-consuming to collect and analyse. This paper derives, under certain conditions, the power of meta-regression and IPD methods to detect treatment-covariate interactions. These power formulae are shown to depend on heterogeneity in the covariate distributions across studies. This allows the derivation of simple tests, based on heterogeneity statistics, for comparing the statistical power of the analysis methods. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17195960     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  53 in total

1.  Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phonthakorn Panichkul; Suthorn Bavonratanavech; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  Efficient network meta-analysis: a confidence distribution approach.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Dungang Liu; Regina Y Liu; Minge Xie; David C Hoaglin
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2014-09-01

Review 3.  Past major depression and smoking cessation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis update.

Authors:  Brian Hitsman; George D Papandonatos; Dennis E McChargue; Andrew DeMott; María José Herrera; Bonnie Spring; Belinda Borrelli; Raymond Niaura
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  On the relative efficiency of using summary statistics versus individual-level data in meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Y Lin; D Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Prevalence of psychological symptoms in contemporary Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers: an exploratory meta-analysis of observational studies using the SCL-90-R.

Authors:  Bao-Liang Zhong; Tie-Bang Liu; Helen F K Chiu; Sandra S M Chan; Chi-Yi Hu; Xue-Feng Hu; Yu-Tao Xiang; Eric D Caine
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Bayesian inference for multivariate meta-analysis Box-Cox transformation models for individual patient data with applications to evaluation of cholesterol-lowering drugs.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Ming-Hui Chen; Joseph G Ibrahim; Arvind K Shah; Jianxin Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A CD-based mapping method for combining multiple related parameters from heterogeneous intervention trials.

Authors:  Yang Jiao; Eun-Young Mun; Thomas A Trikalinos; Minge Xie
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 0.582

8.  The role of environmental heterogeneity in meta-analysis of gene-environment interactions with quantitative traits.

Authors:  Shi Li; Bhramar Mukherjee; Jeremy M G Taylor; Kenneth M Rice; Xiaoquan Wen; John D Rice; Heather M Stringham; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Interpreting meta-regression: application to recent controversies in antidepressants' efficacy.

Authors:  Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; Lei Huang; Liping Deng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Effect of fish oil on circulating adiponectin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jason H Y Wu; Leah E Cahill; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.