Literature DB >> 23001065

Aggregate-data estimation of an individual patient data linear random effects meta-analysis with a patient covariate-treatment interaction term.

Stephanie A Kovalchik1.   

Abstract

Individual patient-data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is the gold standard for investigating how patient factors modify the effectiveness of treatment. Because participant data from primary studies might not be available, reliable alternatives using published data are needed. In this paper, I show that the maximum likelihood estimates of a participant-level linear random effects meta-analysis with a patient covariate-treatment interaction can be determined exactly from aggregate data when the model's variance components are known. I provide an equivalent aggregate-data EM algorithm and supporting software with the R package ipdmeta for the estimation of the "interaction meta-analysis" when the variance components are unknown. The properties of the methodology are assessed with simulation studies. The usefulness of the methods is illustrated with analyses of the effect modification of cholesterol and age on pravastatin in the multicenter placebo-controlled regression growth evaluation statin study. When a participant-level meta-analysis cannot be performed, aggregate-data interaction meta-analysis is a useful alternative for exploring individual-level sources of treatment effect heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001065      PMCID: PMC3590924          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxs035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  25 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

Authors:  Simon G Thompson; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation.

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 8-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; Paul C Lambert; Jan A Staessen; Jiguang Wang; Francois Gueyffier; Lutgarde Thijs; Florent Boutitie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head.

Authors:  Jesse A Berlin; Jill Santanna; Christopher H Schmid; Lynda A Szczech; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  On the relative efficiency of using summary statistics versus individual-level data in meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Y Lin; D Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners.

Authors:  D J Fisher; A J Copas; J F Tierney; M K B Parmar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors.

Authors:  Christopher H Schmid; Paul C Stark; Jesse A Berlin; Paul Landais; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.

Authors:  Laura Koopman; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Arno W Hoes; Diederick E Grobbee; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.188

View more
  5 in total

1.  Efficient Estimation of the Cox Model With Auxiliary Subgroup Survival Information.

Authors:  Chiung-Yu Huang; Jing Qin; Huei-Ting Tsai
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  The role of environmental heterogeneity in meta-analysis of gene-environment interactions with quantitative traits.

Authors:  Shi Li; Bhramar Mukherjee; Jeremy M G Taylor; Kenneth M Rice; Xiaoquan Wen; John D Rice; Heather M Stringham; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 3.  Effects of exercise on depression in adults with arthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  George A Kelley; Kristi S Kelley; Jennifer M Hootman
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 4.  Effects of exercise on BMI z-score in overweight and obese children and adolescents: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  George A Kelley; Kristi S Kelley; Russell R Pate
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joie Ensor; Danielle L Burke; Kym I E Snell; Karla Hemming; Richard D Riley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.