Literature DB >> 27987223

Attenuation correction in 4D-PET using a single-phase attenuation map and rigidity-adaptive deformable registration.

Faraz Kalantari1, Jing Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Four-dimensional positron emission tomography (4D-PET) imaging is a potential solution to the respiratory motion effect in the thoracic region. Computed tomography (CT)-based attenuation correction (AC) is an essential step toward quantitative imaging for PET. However, due to the temporal difference between 4D-PET and a single attenuation map from CT, typically available in routine clinical scanning, motion artifacts are observed in the attenuation-corrected PET images, leading to errors in tumor shape and uptake. We introduced a practical method to align single-phase CT with all other 4D-PET phases for AC.
METHODS: A penalized non-rigid Demons registration between individual 4D-PET frames without AC provides the motion vectors to be used for warping single-phase attenuation map. The non-rigid Demons registration was used to derive deformation vector fields (DVFs) between PET matched with the CT phase and other 4D-PET images. While attenuated PET images provide useful data for organ borders such as those of the lung and the liver, tumors cannot be distinguished from the background due to loss of contrast. To preserve the tumor shape in different phases, an ROI-covering tumor was excluded from nonrigid transformation. Instead the mean DVF of the central region of the tumor was assigned to all voxels in the ROI. This process mimics a rigid transformation of the tumor along with a nonrigid transformation of other organs. A 4D-XCAT phantom with spherical lung tumors, with diameters ranging from 10 to 40 mm, was used to evaluate the algorithm. The performance of the proposed hybrid method for attenuation map estimation was compared to (a) the Demons nonrigid registration only and (b) a single attenuation map based on quantitative parameters in individual PET frames.
RESULTS: Motion-related artifacts were significantly reduced in the attenuation-corrected 4D-PET images. When a single attenuation map was used for all individual PET frames, the normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) values in tumor region were 49.3% (STD: 8.3%), 50.5% (STD: 9.3%), 51.8% (STD: 10.8%) and 51.5% (STD: 12.1%) for 10-mm, 20-mm, 30-mm, and 40-mm tumors, respectively. These errors were reduced to 11.9% (STD: 2.9%), 13.6% (STD: 3.9%), 13.8% (STD: 4.8%), and 16.7% (STD: 9.3%) by our proposed method for deforming the attenuation map. The relative errors in total lesion glycolysis (TLG) values were -0.25% (STD: 2.87%) and 3.19% (STD: 2.35%) for 30-mm and 40-mm tumors, respectively, in proposed method. The corresponding values for Demons method were 25.22% (STD: 14.79%) and 18.42% (STD: 7.06%). Our proposed hybrid method outperforms the Demons method especially for larger tumors. For tumors smaller than 20 mm, nonrigid transformation could also provide quantitative results.
CONCLUSION: Although non-AC 4D-PET frames include insignificant anatomical information, they are still useful to estimate the DVFs to align the attenuation map for accurate AC. The proposed hybrid method can recover the AC-related artifacts and provide quantitative AC-PET images.
© 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D-PET; CT-based attenuation correction; lung tumor; nonrigid registration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27987223      PMCID: PMC5340070          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  48 in total

1.  Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer by respiratory correlated dynamic PET: methodology and comparison with respiratory gated PET.

Authors:  Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Heiko Schoder; Steve M Larson; Olivia D Squire; John L Humm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Maximum-likelihood joint image reconstruction and motion estimation with misaligned attenuation in TOF-PET/CT.

Authors:  Alexandre Bousse; Ottavia Bertolli; David Atkinson; Simon Arridge; Sébastien Ourselin; Brian F Hutton; Kris Thielemans
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Respiratory motion correction for PET oncology applications using affine transformation of list mode data.

Authors:  F Lamare; T Cresson; J Savean; C Cheze Le Rest; A J Reader; D Visvikis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Respiratory-induced errors in tumor quantification and delineation in CT attenuation-corrected PET images: effects of tumor size, tumor location, and respiratory trace: a simulation study using the 4D XCAT phantom.

Authors:  Parham Geramifar; Mojtaba Shamsaie Zafarghandi; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  ML-reconstruction for TOF-PET with simultaneous estimation of the attenuation factors.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Rezaei; Michel Defrise; Johan Nuyts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Automatic volume delineation in oncological PET. Evaluation of a dedicated software tool and comparison with manual delineation in clinical data sets.

Authors:  F Hofheinz; C Pötzsch; L Oehme; B Beuthien-Baumann; J Steinbach; J Kotzerke; J van den Hoff
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 1.379

7.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

8.  18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate?

Authors:  Kenneth J Biehl; Feng-Ming Kong; Farrokh Dehdashti; Jian-Yue Jin; Sasa Mutic; Issam El Naqa; Barry A Siegel; Jeffrey D Bradley
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yvette Seppenwoolde; Hiroki Shirato; Kei Kitamura; Shinichi Shimizu; Marcel van Herk; Joos V Lebesque; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Effective and organ doses using helical 4DCT for thoracic and abdominal therapies.

Authors:  Yuka Matsuzaki; Keisuke Fujii; Motoki Kumagai; Ichiro Tsuruoka; Shinichiro Mori
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.724

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative 4D-PET reconstruction for small animal using SMEIR-reconstructed 4D-CBCT.

Authors:  Yuncheng Zhong; Faraz Kalantari; You Zhang; Yiping Shao; Jing Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 2.  Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.

Authors:  Yu-Jung Tsai; Chi Liu
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.446

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.