Literature DB >> 14644355

Differential effects in cells exposed to ultra-short, high intensity electric fields: cell survival, DNA damage, and cell cycle analysis.

M Stacey1, J Stickley, P Fox, V Statler, K Schoenbach, S J Beebe, S Buescher.   

Abstract

High power, nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) effects have been focused on bacterial decontamination, but the impact on mammalian cells is now being revealed. During nsPEF applications, electrical pulses of 10, 60 or 300 ns durations were applied to cells using electric field amplitudes as high as 300 kV/cm. Because of the ultra-short pulse durations, the energy transferred to cells is negligible, and only non-thermal effects are observed. We investigated the genotoxicity of nsPEF on adherent and non-adherent cell lines including 10 human lines and one mouse cell line with different origin and growth characteristics. We present data examining the effects of nsPEF exposure on cell survival assessed by clonogenic formation or live cell count; DNA damage determined by the comet assay and chromosome aberrations; and cell cycle parameters by measuring the mitotic indices of exposed cells. Using each of these indicators, we observed differential effects among cell types with non-adherent cells being more sensitive to the genotoxic effects of nsPEF exposures than adherent cells. Non-adherent cultures showed a rapid decrease in cell viability (90%), induction of DNA damage, and a decrease in the number of cells reaching mitosis after one 60 ns pulse with an electric field intensity of 60 kV/cm. These effects were not observed in cells grown as adherent cultures, with the exception of the mouse 3T3 cell line, which showed survival characteristics similar to non-adherent cultures. These data suggest that nsPEF genotoxicity may be cell type specific, and therefore have potential applications in the selective removal of one cell type from another, for example, in diseased states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14644355     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  40 in total

1.  Plasma membrane permeabilization by trains of ultrashort electric pulses.

Authors:  Bennett L Ibey; Dustin G Mixon; Jason A Payne; Angela Bowman; Karl Sickendick; Gerald J Wilmink; W Patrick Roach; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.373

2.  Effects of ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses on pre-neoplastic mammary epithelial cell proliferation.

Authors:  P W Sylvester; S J Shah; D T Haynie; K P Briski
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Optimized nanosecond pulsed electric field therapy can cause murine malignant melanomas to self-destruct with a single treatment.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Kevin Tran; Saleh Sheikh; Brian Athos; Mark Kreis; Pamela Nuccitelli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Effect of Cooling On Cell Volume and Viability After Nanoelectroporation.

Authors:  Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Induction of apoptosis of liver cancer cells by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs).

Authors:  Ling He; Deyou Xiao; Jianguo Feng; Chenguo Yao; Liling Tang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Terahertz Electric Field-Induced Membrane Electroporation by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Jingchao Tang; Hairong Yin; Jialu Ma; Wenfei Bo; Yang Yang; Jin Xu; Yiyao Liu; Yubin Gong
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Chantelle Labib; Gintautas Saulis; Vitalij Novickij; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field stimulation of reactive oxygen species in human pancreatic cancer cells is Ca(2+)-dependent.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Kaying Lui; Mark Kreis; Brian Athos; Pamela Nuccitelli
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Gadolinium blocks membrane permeabilization induced by nanosecond electric pulses and reduces cell death.

Authors:  Franck M André; Mikhail A Rassokhin; Angela M Bowman; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 5.373

10.  Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Vera A Khorokhorina; Angela M Bowman; Raminta Rodaitė-Riševičienė; Gintautas Saulis; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.013

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.