Literature DB >> 27986726

Detection of Salmonella enterica in Meat in Less than 5 Hours by a Low-Cost and Noncomplex Sample Preparation Method.

M S R Fachmann1, C Löfström2, J Hoorfar2, F Hansen3, J Christensen2, S Mansdal3, M H Josefsen2.   

Abstract

Salmonella is recognized as one of the most important foodborne bacteria and has wide health and socioeconomic impacts worldwide. Fresh pork meat is one of the main sources of Salmonella, and efficient and fast methods for detection are therefore necessary. Current methods for Salmonella detection in fresh meat usually include >16 h of culture enrichment, in a few cases <12 h, thus requiring at least two working shifts. Here, we report a rapid (<5 h) and high-throughput method for screening of Salmonella in samples from fresh pork meat, consisting of a 3-h enrichment in standard buffered peptone water and a real-time PCR-compatible sample preparation method based on filtration, centrifugation, and enzymatic digestion, followed by fast-cycling real-time PCR detection. The method was validated in an unpaired comparative study against the Nordic Committee on Food Analysis (NMKL) reference culture method 187. Pork meat samples (n = 140) were either artificially contaminated with Salmonella at 0, 1 to 10, or 10 to 100 CFU/25 g of meat or naturally contaminated. Cohen's kappa for the degree of agreement between the rapid method and the reference was 0.64, and the relative accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the rapid method were 81.4, 95.1, and 97.9%, respectively. The 50% limit of detections (LOD50s) were 8.8 CFU/25 g for the rapid method and 7.7 CFU/25 g for the reference method. Implementation of this method will enable faster release of Salmonella low-risk meat, providing savings for meat producers, and it will help contribute to improved food safety.IMPORTANCE While the cost of analysis and hands-on time of the presented rapid method were comparable to those of reference culture methods, the fast product release by this method can provide the meat industry with a competitive advantage. Not only will the abattoirs save costs for work hours and cold storage, but consumers and retailers will also benefit from fresher meat with a longer shelf life. Furthermore, the presented sample preparation might be adjusted for application in the detection of other pathogenic bacteria in different sample types.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salmonella; food safety; foodborne pathogens; fresh meat; rapid tests; real-time PCR; sample preparation; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27986726      PMCID: PMC5311390          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03151-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  32 in total

Review 1.  Pre-PCR processing: strategies to generate PCR-compatible samples.

Authors:  Peter Rådström; Rickard Knutsson; Petra Wolffs; Maria Lövenklev; Charlotta Löfström
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Detection of Salmonella in meat: comparative and interlaboratory validation of a noncomplex and cost-effective pre-PCR protocol.

Authors:  Charlotta Löfström; Flemming Hansen; Susanne Mansdal; Jeffrey Hoorfar
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.913

3.  Cost-effective optimization of real-time PCR-based detection of Campylobacter and Salmonella with inhibitor tolerant DNA polymerases.

Authors:  M S R Fachmann; M H Josefsen; J Hoorfar; M T Nielsen; C Löfström
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 4.  A critical review of measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of food micro-organisms.

Authors:  Janet E L Corry; Basil Jarvis; Sue Passmore; Alan Hedges
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.516

Review 5.  Enumeration of salmonella bacteria in food and feed samples by real-time PCR for quantitative microbial risk assessment.

Authors:  Burkhard Malorny; Charlotta Löfström; Martin Wagner; Nadine Krämer; Jeffrey Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Rapid sample processing for detection of food-borne pathogens via cross-flow microfiltration.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Eduardo Ximenes; Mary Anne Roshni Amalaradjou; Hunter B Vibbert; Kirk Foster; Jim Jones; Xingya Liu; Arun K Bhunia; Michael R Ladisch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evaluation of new preanalysis sample treatment tools and DNA isolation protocols to improve bacterial pathogen detection in whole blood.

Authors:  Wendy L J Hansen; Cathrien A Bruggeman; Petra F G Wolffs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Myoglobin as a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitor: a limitation for PCR from skeletal muscle tissue avoided by the use of Thermus thermophilus polymerase.

Authors:  L Bélec; J Authier; M C Eliezer-Vanerot; C Piédouillet; A S Mohamed; R K Gherardi
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 9.  Recent advances in quantitative PCR (qPCR) applications in food microbiology.

Authors:  Florence Postollec; Hélène Falentin; Sonia Pavan; Jérôme Combrisson; Danièle Sohier
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.516

10.  Culture-independent quantification of Salmonella enterica in carcass gauze swabs by flotation prior to real-time PCR.

Authors:  Charlotta Löfström; Jenny Schelin; Börje Norling; Håkan Vigre; Jeffrey Hoorfar; Peter Rådström
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

View more
  2 in total

1.  Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Philisani Ncoko; Ishmael Festus Jaja; James Wabwire Oguttu
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-07-18

2.  Development of a qPCR for the detection and quantification of Salmonella spp. in sheep feces and tissues.

Authors:  Alysia M Parker; Virginia L Mohler; Alison A Gunn; John K House
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.