Literature DB >> 27982508

Regional Differences in Communication Process and Outcomes of Requests for Solid Organ Donation.

H M Traino1, A J Molisani2, L A Siminoff3.   

Abstract

Although federal mandate prohibits the allocation of solid organs for transplantation based on "accidents of geography," geographic variation of transplantable organs is well documented. This study explores regional differences in communication in requests for organ donation. Administrative data from nine partnering organ procurement organizations and interview data from 1339 family decision makers (FDMs) were compared across eight geographically distinct US donor service areas (DSAs). Authorization for organ donation ranged from 60.4% to 98.1% across DSAs. FDMs from the three regions with the lowest authorization rates reported the lowest levels of satisfaction with the time spent discussing donation and with the request process, discussion of the least donation-related topics, the highest levels of pressure to donate, and the least comfort with the donation decision. Organ procurement organization region predicted authorization (odds ratios ranged from 8.14 to 0.24), as did time spent discussing donation (OR = 2.11), the number of donation-related topics discussed (OR = 1.14), and requesters' communication skill (OR = 1.14). Standardized training for organ donation request staff is needed to ensure the highest quality communication during requests, optimize rates of family authorization to donation in all regions, and increase the supply of organs available for transplantation.
© 2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  donors and donation; health services and outcomes research; organ procurement organization; social sciences

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27982508      PMCID: PMC5444960          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  28 in total

1.  Geographic differences in access to transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Mary D Ellison; Leah B Edwards; Erick B Edwards; Clyde F Barker
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Difficult communication: compliance-gaining strategies of organ procurement coordinators.

Authors:  Ashley E Anker; Thomas Hugh Feeley
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-04

Review 3.  Modeling the allocation system: principles for robust design before restructuring.

Authors:  Sanjay Mehrotra; Vikram Kilambi; Richard Gilroy; Daniela P Ladner; Goran B Klintmalm; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: liver.

Authors:  W R Kim; J R Lake; J M Smith; M A Skeans; D P Schladt; E B Edwards; A M Harper; J L Wainright; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Increasing the Number of Organ Transplants in the United States by Optimizing Donor Authorization Rates.

Authors:  D S Goldberg; B French; P L Abt; R K Gilroy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Investigating geographic variation in mortality in the context of organ donation.

Authors:  E Sheehy; K J O'Connor; R S Luskin; R J Howard; D Cornell; J Finn; T Mone; F W Selck; F L Delmonico
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Communicating Effectively about Organ Donation: A Randomized Trial of a Behavioral Communication Intervention to Improve Discussions about Donation.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather M Traino; Maureen Wilson Genderson
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2015-03

8.  Geographic variation in end-stage renal disease incidence and access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  A K Mathur; V B Ashby; R L Sands; R A Wolfe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting.

Authors:  S E Gentry; A B Massie; S W Cheek; K L Lentine; E H Chow; C E Wickliffe; N Dzebashvili; P R Salvalaggio; M A Schnitzler; D A Axelrod; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  The extent and predictors of waiting time geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Ashley E Davis; Sanjay Mehrotra; Lisa M McElroy; John J Friedewald; Anton I Skaro; Brittany Lapin; Raymond Kang; Jane L Holl; Michael M Abecassis; Daniela P Ladner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  6 in total

1.  Will the unusual become usual? A new legal change that aims to increase discussions around organ and tissue donation in England.

Authors:  Heena Khiroya; Adnan Sharif; June Jones; Derek Willis
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-03

2.  Wide variation in the percentage of donation after circulatory death donors across donor service areas - a potential target for improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Between-hospital variability in organ donation after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Amy R Weisgerber; David J Wallace; Edward Horne; Susan A Stuart; Kurt Shutterly; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Wide Variation in the Percentage of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Across Donor Service Areas: A Potential Target for Improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David S Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.385

5.  Knowledge Does Not Correlate with Behavior toward Deceased Organ Donation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Japan.

Authors:  Minoru Murakami; Shingo Fukuma; Masaya Ikezoe; Satoshi Izawa; Hitoshi Watanabe; Hiroshi Yamaguchi; Akihiro Kitazawa; Katsusada Takahashi; Shusuke Natsukawa; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.530

6. 

Authors:  Jeffrey M Singh; Ian M Ball; Michael Hartwick; Eli Malus; Karim Soliman; John G Boyd; Sonny Dhanani; Andrew Healey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 8.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.