Ashley E Davis1, Sanjay Mehrotra, Lisa M McElroy, John J Friedewald, Anton I Skaro, Brittany Lapin, Raymond Kang, Jane L Holl, Michael M Abecassis, Daniela P Ladner. 1. 1 Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. 2 Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 3 Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 4 Center for Engineering and Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 5 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 6 Address correspondence to: Daniela P. Ladner, M.D., M.P.H., Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery Director Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC) Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 1900 Chicago, IL 60611.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Waiting time to deceased donor kidney transplant varies greatly across the United States. This variation violates the final rule, a federal mandate, which demands geographic equity in organ allocation for transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the United States Renal Data System and United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2000 to 2009. Median waiting time was calculated for each of the 58 donor service areas (DSA) in the United States. Multivariate regression was performed to identify DSA predictors for long waiting times to kidney transplantation. RESULTS: The median waiting time varied between the 58 DSAs from 0.61 to 4.57 years, ranging from 0.59 to 5.17 years for standard criteria donor kidneys and 0.41 to 4.69 years for expanded criteria donor kidneys. The disparity in waiting time between the DSAs grew from 3.26 years (range, 0.41-3.67) in 2000 to 4.72 years (range, 0.50-5.22) in 2009. In DSAs with longer waiting times, there were significantly more patients suffering from end-stage renal disease and more patients listed for kidney transplant, lower kidney procurement rates, and higher transplant center competition. Patients were more likely black, sensitized, with lower educational attainment and less likely to waitlist outside of their DSA of residence. Donor organs used in DSAs with long waiting times were more likely hepatitis C positive and had a higher kidney donor profile index. Graft and patient survival at 5 years was worse for deceased donor kidney transplant, but rates for living donor kidney transplant were higher. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates significant and worsening geographic disparity in waiting time for kidney transplant across the DSAs. Increase in living donor kidney transplant and use of marginal organs has not mitigated the disparity. Changes to the kidney allocation system might be required to resolve this extensive geographic disparity in kidney allocation.
BACKGROUND: Waiting time to deceased donor kidney transplant varies greatly across the United States. This variation violates the final rule, a federal mandate, which demands geographic equity in organ allocation for transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the United States Renal Data System and United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2000 to 2009. Median waiting time was calculated for each of the 58 donor service areas (DSA) in the United States. Multivariate regression was performed to identify DSA predictors for long waiting times to kidney transplantation. RESULTS: The median waiting time varied between the 58 DSAs from 0.61 to 4.57 years, ranging from 0.59 to 5.17 years for standard criteria donor kidneys and 0.41 to 4.69 years for expanded criteria donor kidneys. The disparity in waiting time between the DSAs grew from 3.26 years (range, 0.41-3.67) in 2000 to 4.72 years (range, 0.50-5.22) in 2009. In DSAs with longer waiting times, there were significantly more patients suffering from end-stage renal disease and more patients listed for kidney transplant, lower kidney procurement rates, and higher transplant center competition. Patients were more likely black, sensitized, with lower educational attainment and less likely to waitlist outside of their DSA of residence. Donor organs used in DSAs with long waiting times were more likely hepatitis C positive and had a higher kidney donor profile index. Graft and patient survival at 5 years was worse for deceased donor kidney transplant, but rates for living donor kidney transplant were higher. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates significant and worsening geographic disparity in waiting time for kidney transplant across the DSAs. Increase in living donor kidney transplant and use of marginal organs has not mitigated the disparity. Changes to the kidney allocation system might be required to resolve this extensive geographic disparity in kidney allocation.
Authors: Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Xun Luo; Jessica M Ruck; Eric K H Chow; Mary G Bowring; Sunjae Bae; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-01-27 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Kristen L King; S Ali Husain; Jesse D Schold; Rachel E Patzer; Peter P Reese; Zhezhen Jin; Lloyd E Ratner; David J Cohen; Stephen O Pastan; Sumit Mohan Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Kira L Newman; Raymond J Lynch; Andrew B Adams; Rebecca Zhang; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Courtenay M Holscher; Mary G Bowring; Christine E Haugen; Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Sommer E Gentry; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang Journal: Transplantation Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Hans F Fuchs; Ryan C Broderick; Cristina R Harnsberger; David C Chang; Elisabeth C Mclemore; Sonia Ramamoorthy; Santiago Horgan Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-12-25 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kira L Newman; Stacey A Fedewa; Melanie H Jacobson; Andrew B Adams; Rebecca Zhang; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.939