Literature DB >> 31644491

Wide variation in the percentage of donation after circulatory death donors across donor service areas - a potential target for improvement.

Elizabeth M Sonnenberg1,2,3, Jesse Y Hsu4, Peter P Reese2,4,5, David Goldberg2,4,6, Peter L Abt1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substantial differences exist in the clinical characteristics of donors across the 58 donor services areas (DSAs). Organ procurement organization (OPO) performance metrics incorporate organs donated after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) donors, but do not measure potential DCDD donors.
METHODS: Using 2011-2016 UNOS data, we examined the variability in DCDD donors/all deceased donors (%DCDD) across DSAs. We supplemented UNOS data with CDC death records and OPO statistics to characterize underlying process and system factors that may correlate with donors and utilization.
RESULTS: Among 52,184 deceased donors, the %DCDD varied widely across DSAs, with a median of 15.1% (IQR [9.3%, 20.9%]; range 0.0-32.0%). The %DCDD had a modest positive correlation with 4 DSA factors: median match MELD, proportion of white deaths out of total deaths, kidney center competition, and %DCDD livers by a local transplant center (all Spearman coefficients 0.289-0.464), and negative correlation with 1 factor: mean kidney waiting time (Spearman coefficient -0.388). Adjusting for correlated variables in linear regression explained 46.3% of the variability in %DCDD.
CONCLUSIONS: Donor pool demographics, waitlist metrics, center competition and DCDD utilization explain only a portion of the variability of DCDD donors. This requires further studies and policy changes to encourage consideration of all possible organ donors.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31644491      PMCID: PMC7170761          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  27 in total

Review 1.  The critical pathway for deceased donation: reportable uniformity in the approach to deceased donation.

Authors:  Beatriz Domínguez-Gil; Francis L Delmonico; Faissal A M Shaheen; Rafael Matesanz; Kevin O'Connor; Marina Minina; Elmi Muller; Kimberly Young; Marti Manyalich; Jeremy Chapman; Günter Kirste; Mustafa Al-Mousawi; Leen Coene; Valter Duro García; Serguei Gautier; Tomonori Hasegawa; Vivekanand Jha; Tong Kiat Kwek; Zhonghua Klaus Chen; Bernard Loty; Alessandro Nanni Costa; Howard M Nathan; Rutger Ploeg; Oleg Reznik; John D Rosendale; Annika Tibell; George Tsoulfas; Anantharaman Vathsala; Luc Noël
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.782

2.  Regional Differences in Communication Process and Outcomes of Requests for Solid Organ Donation.

Authors:  H M Traino; A J Molisani; L A Siminoff
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Use and Outcomes of Kidneys from Donation after Circulatory Death Donors in the United States.

Authors:  John Gill; Caren Rose; Julie Lesage; Yayuk Joffres; Jagbir Gill; Kevin O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation.

Authors:  A K Israni; D Zaun; J D Rosendale; C Schaffhausen; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The impact of variation in donation after cardiac death policies among donor hospitals: a regional analysis.

Authors:  J Y Rhee; R Ruthazer; K O'Connor; F L Delmonico; R S Luskin; R B Freeman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Cost Evaluation of a Donation after Cardiac Death Program: How Cost per Organ Compares to Other Donor Types.

Authors:  Jessica Lindemann; Leigh Anne Dageforde; Neeta Vachharajani; Emily Stahlschmidt; Diane Brockmeier; Jason R Wellen; Adeel Khan; William C Chapman; Mb Majella Doyle
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Impact of a National Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Program on Organ Donation in the United Kingdom: A 10-Year Study.

Authors:  R Hodgson; A L Young; M A Attia; J P A Lodge
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Interim results of a national test of the rapid assessment of hospital procurement barriers in donation (RAPiD).

Authors:  H M Traino; G P Alolod; T Shafer; L A Siminoff
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Donation after circulatory death: current practices, ongoing challenges, and potential improvements.

Authors:  Paul E Morrissey; Anthony P Monaco
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Envisioning and Leading Organizational Transformation: One Organ Procurement Organization's Journey.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Orlowski
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.