| Literature DB >> 27977739 |
Orna Liarzi1, Einat Bar2, Efraim Lewinsohn2, David Ezra1.
Abstract
Endophytic fungi are organisms that spend most of their life cycle within plant tissues without causing any visible damage to the host plant. Many endophytes were found to secrete specialized metabolites and/or emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which may be biologically active and assist fungal survival inside the plant as well as benefit their hosts. We report on the isolation and characterization of a VOCs-emitting endophytic fungus, isolated from an olive tree (Olea europaea L.) growing in Israel; the isolate was identified as Daldinia cf. concentrica. We found that the emitted VOCs were active against various fungi from diverse phyla. Results from postharvest experiments demonstrated that D. cf. concentrica prevented development of molds on organic dried fruits, and eliminated Aspergillus niger infection in peanuts. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of the volatiles led to identification of 27 VOCs. On the basis of these VOCs we prepared two mixtures that displayed a broad spectrum of antifungal activity. In postharvest experiments these mixtures prevented development of molds on wheat grains, and fully eliminated A. niger infection in peanuts. In light of these findings, we suggest use of D. cf. concentrica and/or its volatiles as an alternative approach to controlling phytopathogenic fungi in the food industry and in agriculture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27977739 PMCID: PMC5158029 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effects of the volatile compounds of D. cf. concentrica and artificial mixtures on tested plant pathogenic fungi and oomycete
| Mixture A | Mixture B | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogen | Growth inhibition | Viability | Growth inhibition | Viability | Growth inhibition | Viability |
| 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | - | 98.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | + | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | + | 100.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | + | 100.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 81.60 | + | 96.96 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | + | 100.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 69.60 | + | 95.92 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 0.0 | + | 95.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | - | 94.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | - | 95.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | |
| 9.60 | + | 93.33 | - | 96.67 | - | |
| 30.80 | + | 96.67 | - | 96.67 | - | |
| 100.0 | - | 98.0 | + | 100.0 | - | |
| 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | 100.0 | - | |
* D. cf. concentrica was grown for 6 days on PDB prior to its exposure to test fungi or oomycete.
** The concentration of the mixtures was 1 mL/L air space.
*** Growth inhibition after 6 days was calculated as percentage inhibition compared with that of a control grown under the same conditions in the absence of D. cf. concentrica or mixtures.
**** Viability of the tested fungi or oomycete after 6 days of exposure to D. cf. concentrica or mixtures.
Fig 1Prevention of fungal damage by D. cf. concentrica volatiles on organic dried fruits.
(A) Control swollen fruits. (B) Swollen fruits in the presence of one culture dish of D. cf. concentrica. (C) Swollen fruits in the presence of two culture dishes of D. cf. concentrica.
Fig 2Disinfecting effect of D. cf. concentrica volatiles on peanuts.
(A) A. niger inoculated peanuts. (B) A. niger inoculated peanuts in the presence of one culture dish of D. cf. concentrica. (C) A. niger inoculated peanuts in the presence of two culture dishes of D. cf. concentrica.
Compounds emitted by D. cf. concentrica
| Retention time (min) | Suggested compound | Molecular formula | Main fragments (m/z) | Area (%) | MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-methyl-1-butanol | C5H12O | 42, | 1.0 | 88 | |
| 2-methyl-1-butanol | C5H12O | 41, 56, | 1.1 | 88 | |
| 1-methyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene | C7H10 | 77, | 6.5 | 94 | |
| 1-methyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene | C7H10 | 77, | 3.9 | 94 | |
| 4-heptanone | C7H14O | 0.2 | 114 | ||
| isoamyl acetate | C7H14O2 | traces | 130 | ||
| 4-heptyn-2-ol | C7H12O | 45, 53, 67 | 4.2 | 112 | |
| C8H14O | 42, 55, | 33.3 | 126 | ||
| octanal | C8H16O | 69, 71, | 4.7 | 128 | |
| 4,4-dimethyl-1,3-cyclopentanedione | C7H10O2 | 41, | 4.0 | 126 | |
| 2,2,5-trimethylcyclopentanone | C8H14O | 41, | 16.5 | 126 | |
| phenyl ethyl alcohol | C8H10O | 65, | 1.9 | 122 | |
| β-elemene | C15H24 | 41, 53, 55, 67, 68, 79, 81, | 0.06 | 204 | |
| β-elemene | C15H24 | 41, 53, 55, 67, 68, 79, 81, | 1.0 | 204 | |
| (+)-α-funebrene | C15H24 | - | traces | - | |
| α-guaiene | C15H24 | 41, 53, 55, 67, 79, 81, 93, | 0.1 | 204 | |
| 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethanol | C8H10O2 | ? | 0.08 | 204 | |
| terpenes | C10H10O3 | 108, | 9.0 | 178 | |
| β-selinene | C15H24 | 41, 53, 55, 67, 79, 81, 91, 93, | 0.7 | 204 | |
| α-selinene | C15H24 | 41, 53, 55, 67, 79, 81, 91, 93, 107, 121, 133, 147, 161, 175, | 0.2 | 204 | |
| α-bulnesene | C15H24 | 41, 53, 55, 67, 79, 81, 91, 93, | 0.7 | 204 | |
| germacrene A | C15H24 | - | traces | - | |
| 7-epi-α-selinene | C15H24 | - | traces | - | |
| dauca-4(11),8-diene | C15H24 | - | traces | - | |
| veratryl acetone | C11H14O3 | - | traces | - | |
| 3-methoxy-2-naphthol | C11H10O2 | 77, 131, 159, 174 | 1.6 | 174 | |
| pogostol | C15 H26O | 41, 53, 55, 71, 81, 93, | 1.2 | 222 |
* identified according to NIST Mass Spectral Library, ver. 2.0 d
Biological activity of each chemical component consisting 1 mL/L (air space) of Mixture A
| 3-methyl-1-butanol | (±)-2-methyl-1-butanol | 4-heptanone | isoamyl acetate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth inhibition | Viability | Growth inhibition | Viability | Growth inhibition | Viability | Growth inhibition | Viability | |
| 23.8 | + | 17.5 | + | 42.0 | + | 18.5 | + | |
| 28.4 | + | 40.5 | + | 64.2 | + | 38.4 | + | |
| 45.7 | + | 39.1 | + | 79.5 | + | 39.1 | + | |
| 0.0 | + | 18.7 | + | 0.0 | + | 7.3 | + | |
* The concentrations was 0.2 mL/L air space.
** The concentrations was 0.4 mL/L air space.
*** Growth inhibition after 6 days was calculated as percentage inhibition compared with that of a control grown under the same conditions in the absence of the chemical compound.
**** Viability of the tested fungi after 6 days of exposure to the chemical compound
Biological activity of each chemical component consisting 1 mL/L (air space) of Mixture B
| 4-heptanone | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth inhibition | Viability | Growth inhibition | Viability | |
| 6.8 | + | 100 | - | |
| 40.7 | + | 100 | - | |
| 70.3 | + | 100 | - | |
| 0 | + | 100 | - | |
* The concentrations was 0.5 mL/L air space.
** Growth inhibition after 6 days was calculated as percentage inhibition compared with that of a control grown under the same conditions in the absence of the chemical compound.
*** Viability of the tested fungi after 6 days of exposure to the chemical compound.
Fig 3Disinfecting effect of chemical mixtures on commercial wheat grains.
(A) Untreated wheat grains. (B) Wheat grains after exposure to Mixture A at 0.25 mL/L. (C) Wheat grains after exposure to Mixture B at 0.25 mL/L.
Fig 4Disinfecting effect of chemical mixtures on peanuts.
Upper panel–Mixture A: (A) Peanuts inoculated with A. niger in the presence of mixture at 1 mL/L. (B) Peanuts inoculated with A. niger in the absence of mixture. (C) Uninoculated peanuts in the presence of mixture at 1 mL/L. (D) Uninoculated peanuts in the absence of mixture. Lower panel–Mixture B: (A) Uninoculated peanuts in the absence of mixture. (B) Uninoculated peanuts in the presence of mixture at 0.05 mL/L. (C) Uninoculated peanuts in the presence of mixture at 0.5 mL/L. Arrows indicate the development of intrinsic Aspergillus sp.