Literature DB >> 31184543

Reflecting on progress since the 2005 NARSTO emissions inventory report.

Melissa Day1, George Pouliot2, Sherri Hunt2, Kirk R Baker3, Megan Beardsley4, Gregory Frost5, David Mobley2,3, Heather Simon3, Barron B Henderson3, Tiffany Yelverton2, Venkatesh Rao3.   

Abstract

Emission inventories are the foundation for cost-effective air quality management activities. In 2005, a report by the public/private partnership North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone (NARSTO) evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of North American emissions inventories and made recommendations for improving their effectiveness. This paper reviews the recommendation areas and briefly discusses what has been addressed, what remains unchanged, and new questions that have arisen. The findings reveal that all emissions inventory improvement areas identified by the 2005 NARSTO publication have been explored and implemented to some degree. The U.S. National Emissions Inventory has become more detailed and has incorporated new research into previously under-characterized sources such as fine particles and biomass burning. Additionally, it is now easier to access the emissions inventory and the documentation of the inventory via the internet. However, many emissions-related research needs exist, on topics such as emission estimation methods, speciation, scalable emission factor development, incorporation of new emission measurement techniques, estimation of uncertainty, top-down verification, and analysis of uncharacterized sources. A common theme throughout this retrospective summary is the need for increased coordination among stakeholders. Researchers and inventory developers must work together to ensure that planned emissions research and new findings can be used to update the emissions inventory. To continue to address emissions inventory challenges, industry, the scientific community, and government agencies need to continue to leverage resources and collaborate as often as possible. As evidenced by the progress noted, continued investment in and coordination of emissions inventory activities will provide dividends to air quality management programs across the country, continent, and world. Implications: In 2005, a report by the public/private partnership North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone (NARSTO) evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of North American air pollution emissions inventories. This paper reviews the eight recommendation areas and briefly discusses what has been addressed, what remains unchanged, and new questions that have arisen. Although progress has been made, many opportunities exist for the scientific agencies, industry, and government agencies to leverage resources and collaborate to continue improving emissions inventories.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31184543      PMCID: PMC6784547          DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1629363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  42 in total

1.  Increase in NOx emissions from Indian thermal power plants during 1996-2010: unit-based inventories and multisatellite observations.

Authors:  Zifeng Lu; David G Streets
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Air emission inventories in North America: a critical assessment.

Authors:  C Andrew Miller; George Hidy; Jeremy Hales; Charles E Kolb; Arthur S Werner; Bernd Haneke; David Parrish; H Christopher Frey; Leonora Rojas-Bracho; Marc Deslauriers; Bill Pennell; J David Mobley
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Community Vulnerability to Health Impacts of Wildland Fire Smoke Exposure.

Authors:  Ana G Rappold; Jeanette Reyes; George Pouliot; Wayne E Cascio; David Diaz-Sanchez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data.

Authors:  K R Baker; M C Woody; L Valin; J Szykman; E L Yates; L T Iraci; H D Choi; A J Soja; S N Koplitz; L Zhou; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Jose L Jimenez; J W Hair
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Methane emissions from the 2015 Aliso Canyon blowout in Los Angeles, CA.

Authors:  S Conley; G Franco; I Faloona; D R Blake; J Peischl; T B Ryerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions.

Authors:  Brian C McDonald; Joost A de Gouw; Jessica B Gilman; Shantanu H Jathar; Ali Akherati; Christopher D Cappa; Jose L Jimenez; Julia Lee-Taylor; Patrick L Hayes; Stuart A McKeen; Yu Yan Cui; Si-Wan Kim; Drew R Gentner; Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz; Allen H Goldstein; Robert A Harley; Gregory J Frost; James M Roberts; Thomas B Ryerson; Michael Trainer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U.S. using a Fuel-Based Mobile Source Emissions Inventory.

Authors:  Brian C McDonald; Stuart A McKeen; Yu Yan Cui; Ravan Ahmadov; Si-Wan Kim; Gregory J Frost; Ilana B Pollack; Jeff Peischl; Thomas B Ryerson; John S Holloway; Martin Graus; Carsten Warneke; Jessica B Gilman; Joost A de Gouw; Jennifer Kaiser; Frank N Keutsch; Thomas F Hanisco; Glenn M Wolfe; Michael Trainer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Chemical data quantify Deepwater Horizon hydrocarbon flow rate and environmental distribution.

Authors:  Thomas B Ryerson; Richard Camilli; John D Kessler; Elizabeth B Kujawinski; Christopher M Reddy; David L Valentine; Elliot Atlas; Donald R Blake; Joost de Gouw; Simone Meinardi; David D Parrish; Jeff Peischl; Jeffrey S Seewald; Carsten Warneke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Airborne measurements of isoprene and monoterpene emissions from southeastern U.S. forests.

Authors:  Haofei Yu; Alex Guenther; Dasa Gu; Carsten Warneke; Chris Geron; Allen Goldstein; Martin Graus; Thomas Karl; Lisa Kaser; Pawel Misztal; Bin Yuan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Why do Models Overestimate Surface Ozone in the Southeastern United States?

Authors:  Katherine R Travis; Daniel J Jacob; Jenny A Fisher; Patrick S Kim; Eloise A Marais; Lei Zhu; Karen Yu; Christopher C Miller; Robert M Yantosca; Melissa P Sulprizio; Anne M Thompson; Paul O Wennberg; John D Crounse; Jason M St Clair; Ronald C Cohen; Joshua L Laughner; Jack E Dibb; Samuel R Hall; Kirk Ullmann; Glenn M Wolfe; Illana B Pollack; Jeff Peischl; Jonathan A Neuman; Xianliang Zhou
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.