Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne1, Shohreh F Farzan2, Mitiasoa Razafy2, Jill E Johnston2. 1. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA. Electronic address: yvanhorn@usc.edu. 2. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to pesticides and agricultural burning are likely to co-occur in agricultural communities, but these exposures have remained distinct bodies of research. We reviewed epidemiological studies to identify the respiratory health effects of children exposed to pesticides and agricultural burning through a systematic evaluation of peer-reviewed publications of children living in industrial agricultural areas. METHODS: Two academic search databases (PubMed and Scopus) were queried for all available studies published in English before May 31st, 2021. The initial search combining both exposure metrics (pesticides and agricultural burning) yielded zero publications and thus the queries were performed and presented separately. RESULTS: Studies were categorized based on main exposure of interest (i.e., pesticides or agricultural burning) and by respiratory health outcome assessment (i.e., self-reported asthma, acute respiratory symptoms, and lung function measurements). In total we identified 25 studies that focused on pesticide exposures and children's respiratory health, and 12 studies that focused on exposure to agricultural burning and children's respiratory health. A majority of the pesticide studies (18/25) reported a positive association between exposure to pesticides and adverse childhood respiratory health effects. Similarly, most (11/12) of the agricultural burning studies also reported a positive association between exposure to agricultural burning and adverse respiratory health effects. CONCLUSION: The most frequently studied health outcomes in these publications were acute respiratory symptoms (n = 11 pesticides, n = 3 agricultural burning), followed by asthma (n = 9 pesticides, n = 3 agricultural burning), and lung function measurements (n = 5 pesticides, n = 6 agricultural burning). Although health outcome assessment differed between pesticide studies and agricultural burning studies, similar adverse respiratory health effects were observed across the majority of studies.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to pesticides and agricultural burning are likely to co-occur in agricultural communities, but these exposures have remained distinct bodies of research. We reviewed epidemiological studies to identify the respiratory health effects of children exposed to pesticides and agricultural burning through a systematic evaluation of peer-reviewed publications of children living in industrial agricultural areas. METHODS: Two academic search databases (PubMed and Scopus) were queried for all available studies published in English before May 31st, 2021. The initial search combining both exposure metrics (pesticides and agricultural burning) yielded zero publications and thus the queries were performed and presented separately. RESULTS: Studies were categorized based on main exposure of interest (i.e., pesticides or agricultural burning) and by respiratory health outcome assessment (i.e., self-reported asthma, acute respiratory symptoms, and lung function measurements). In total we identified 25 studies that focused on pesticide exposures and children's respiratory health, and 12 studies that focused on exposure to agricultural burning and children's respiratory health. A majority of the pesticide studies (18/25) reported a positive association between exposure to pesticides and adverse childhood respiratory health effects. Similarly, most (11/12) of the agricultural burning studies also reported a positive association between exposure to agricultural burning and adverse respiratory health effects. CONCLUSION: The most frequently studied health outcomes in these publications were acute respiratory symptoms (n = 11 pesticides, n = 3 agricultural burning), followed by asthma (n = 9 pesticides, n = 3 agricultural burning), and lung function measurements (n = 5 pesticides, n = 6 agricultural burning). Although health outcome assessment differed between pesticide studies and agricultural burning studies, similar adverse respiratory health effects were observed across the majority of studies.
Authors: Jennifer D Runkle; J Antonio Tovar-Aguilar; Eugenia Economos; Joan Flocks; Bryan Williams; Juan F Muniz; Marie Semple; Linda McCauley Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Ana M Mora; Jane A Hoppin; Leonel Córdoba; Juan C Cano; Manuel Soto-Martínez; Brenda Eskenazi; Christian H Lindh; Berna van Wendel de Joode Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: M I Asher; U Keil; H R Anderson; R Beasley; J Crane; F Martinez; E A Mitchell; N Pearce; B Sibbald; A W Stewart Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: José E D Cançado; Paulo H N Saldiva; Luiz A A Pereira; Luciene B L S Lara; Paulo Artaxo; Luiz A Martinelli; Marcos A Arbex; Antonella Zanobetti; Alfesio L F Braga Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Joshua A Lawson; James A Dosman; Donna C Rennie; Jeremy R Beach; Stephen C Newman; Trever Crowe; Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Jennifer Runkle; Joan Flocks; Jeannie Economos; J Antonio Tovar-Aguilar; Linda McCauley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 3.390