| Literature DB >> 27958338 |
Fang-Xin Wang1, Mu-He Chen1, Xiao-Ying Hu1, Rui-Rong Ye1, Cai-Ping Tan1, Liang-Nian Ji1, Zong-Wan Mao1.
Abstract
OrganometallicEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27958338 PMCID: PMC5154195 DOI: 10.1038/srep38954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The chemical structures of cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes.
Figure 2(A) X-ray crystal structures of 2a and 2b. The thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms, counter ions and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. (B) UV-vis absorption spectra and (C) emission spectra of representative Ir(III) complexes in CH3CN at 298 K.
Figure 3(A) Lipophilicity (log Po/w) of the Ir(III) complexes. (B) Cellular uptake of the Ir(III) complexes determined by ICP-MS. Cells were incubated with Ir(III) complexes (20 μM) at 310 K for 1 h.
IC50 values of Ir(III) complexes towards different cell lines in vitro.
| Complex | IC50 (μM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HeLa | A549 | A549R | HepG2 | MCF-7 | |
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | |
| 35.1 ± 2.7 | >100 | 77.6 ± 3.0 | >100 | 68.4 ± 2.5 | |
| 15.8 ± 1.3 | 13.9 ± 1.2 | 9.1 ± 1.0 | 19.5 ± 1.7 | 23.5 ± 2.2 | |
| 2.1 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | |
| 2.2 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.4 | |
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | |
| 24.6 ± 1.2 | 10.5 ± 1.0 | 10.2 ± 0.9 | 20.9 ± 1.9 | 35.2 ± 2.3 | |
| 7.3 ± 0.6 | 16.8 ± 1.2 | 14.1 ± 1.2 | 12.0 ± 1.1 | 19.5 ± 1.0 | |
| 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | |
| 2.4 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 8.4 ± 0.7 | |
| cisplatin | 25.1 ± 2.2 | 23.7 ± 1.0 | 79.4 ± 6.1 | 15.8 ± 1.2 | 16.8 ± 1.5 |
aIC50 values are drug concentrations necessary for 50% inhibition of cell viability. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations obtained in at least three independent experiments.
Figure 4(A) Colocalization of 4a and 4b with MTDR. Cells were incubated with 4a (5 μM) or 4b (5 μM) for 15 min, and then stained with MTDR (100 nM) for 15 min. The excitation wavelength of complexes was 405 nm, and emission was collected at 630‒690 nm (4a) and 540‒600 nm (4b). The excitation wavelength of MTDR was 543 nm, and emission was collected at 645‒685 nm. Scale bars: 5 μm.
Figure 5(A) Loss of MMP in A549 cells treated with 4a or 4b. Cells were incubated with Ir(III) complexes at the indicated concentrations for 6 h and then stained with JC-1. JC-1 was excited at 488 nm and monitored simultaneously at 515‒545 nm (Green) and 575‒605 nm (Red). (B) Depletion of cellular ATP levels in A549 cells treated with 4a or 4b. Cells were incubated with 4a or 4b at the indicated concentrations for 6 h. The luminescence intensity was measured by a microplate reader. **p < 0.02.
Figure 6(A) ROS elevation in A549 cells treated with 4a or 4b. Cells were treated with 4a or 4b at the indicated concentrations for 6 h, and stained by H2DCFDA. Samples were detected by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. The excitation wavelength of DCF was 488 nm. Emission was collected at 510‒540 nm. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The impact of scavenging ROS by NAC on anti-proliferative activity of 4a or 4b. Cells were pre-incubated with NAC for 1 h, and then treated with 4a or 4b for 24 h. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. **p < 0.02.
Figure 7Cell cycle analysis by PI staining after A549 cells were treated with 4a and 4b at the indicated concentrations for 24 h.
Figure 8(A) Representative TEM images of A549 cells treated with 4a and 4b at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Scale bars: 5 μm. (B) Representative images of A549 cells expressing GFP-LC3 treated with 4a (4 μM), 4b (4 μM) and rapamycin (1 μM) for 24 h. Scale bar: 5 μm. (C) Western blot analysis of LC3 proteins extracted from A549 cells. Cells were treated with 4a (4 μM) and 4b (4 μM) for 24 h. (D) Confocal microscopic analysis of A549 cells stained with AO after treatment with 4a (4 μM) and 4b (4 μM) for 24 h. AO was excited at 488 nm and monitored simultaneously at 500‒550 nm (Green) and 670‒710 nm (Red). Scale bars: 10 μm. (E) Mean red fluorescence intensity determined by flow cytometry in A549 cells stained with AO after treatment with 4a or 4b at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. AO was excited at 488 nm and emission was collected at 670‒710 nm. (F) The impact of 3-MA on anti-proliferative activity of cisplatin, 4a and 4b. Cells were pre-treated with 3-MA for 1 h and then incubated with cisplatin, 4a or 4b at indicated concentrations for 24 h. **p < 0.02.
Figure 9(A) Flow cytometric quantification of Annexin V-FITC and PI double labelled A549 cells after treatment with cisplatin, 4a and 4b for 24 h at the indicated concentrations. The excitation wavelength was 488 nm and the emission was monitored at 525 ± 20 nm for Annexin V-FITC and 615 ± 20 nm for PI. (B) Activation of caspase 3/7 in A549 cells by Ir(III) treatment. The cells were incubated with cisplatin, 4a and 4b at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. (C) The effects of the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk on Ir(III)-induced cell death. Cells were pre-incubated with z-VAD-fmk for 1 h and then treated with cisplatin, 4a and 4b for 24 h. **p < 0.02.