| Literature DB >> 30804454 |
Subramanian Ambika1,2, Yesaiyan Manojkumar1,2, Sankaralingam Arunachalam3,4, Balakrishnan Gowdhami5,6, Kishore Kumar Meenakshi Sundaram7, Rajadurai Vijay Solomon8, Ponnambalam Venuvanalingam1, Mohammad Abdulkader Akbarsha5,9, Muthuraman Sundararaman10.
Abstract
Two cobalt(III) Schiff baseEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30804454 PMCID: PMC6389928 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39179-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Scheme of synthesis of complexes 1 and 2.
Figure 2Electronic absorption spectra of cobalt(III) complexes 1 (a) and 2 (b) in the absence (dashed line) and presence (solid line) of increasing amounts of DNA. Insert: Plot of [DNA]/(εa − εf) vs [DNA]. [Complex] = 2 × 10−5 M−1, [DNA] = 0–2.1 × 10−4 M−1. Emission spectra (λex = 450 nm) of EB - DNA: in the absence (dotted line) and in the presence of (solid line) of the complexes 1 (c) and 2 (d). Stern-Volmer (CV) plot (e) of fluorescence quenching of EB - DNA by complexes 1 and 2. Cyclic Voltammetry of complexes 1 (f) and 2 (g) in the absence ( black line) and in the presence (red line) of DNA. Circular dichroism spectra of CT-DNA (4 × 10−5 M) in the presence of complex 1 (h) and 2 (i), r = [complex]/[DNA] = 0.0, 0.1 and 0.5).
The percentage of hypochromism, binding constant (Kb) and Stern–Volmer constant (Ksv) of the complexes 1 and 2 with CT-DNA.
| Complexes | % H | Kb (M−1) | Ksv |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex | 30.34 | 1.31 × 104 | 0.5694 |
| Complex | 36.81 | 3.15 × 104 | 0.6067 |
Redox potentials of cobalt(III) complexes 1 and 2 with DNA.
| Complexes | Epc (V) | ipc (A) |
|---|---|---|
| Complex 1 | −0.490 | −1.184 × 10−5 |
| Complex 1 + DNA | −0.467 | −9.674 × 10−6 |
| Complex 2 | −0.265 | −3.622 × 10−6 |
| Complex 2 + DNA | −0.243 | −2.695 × 10−6 |
Figure 3The fluorescence emission spectra of BSA in the presence of complexes 1 (a) and 2 (b). The dashed line shows the intensity of BSA in the absence of complexes. After addition of the complexes 1 and 2 ([complex] = 0–4 × 10−6 M; [BSA] = 1.35 × 10−6 M) to BSA, the emission intensity of BSA was decreased which is indicated by “arrow”. Stern-Volmer plot for quenching of BSA by cobalt(III) complexes 1 (c) and 2 (d). The UV-Vis absorption spectra of BSA and complexes 1 (e) and 2 (f). Plot of log[(F0 − F)/F] vs log [Q] for BSA- cobalt(III) complexes 1 (g) and 2 (h). van’t Hoff plot for the interaction of BSA with complexes 1 and 2 (i).
The quenching constant, binding constant, number of binding sites and thermodynamic parameters for the interactions of the complexes 1 and 2 with BSA.
| Complexes | Temp (K) | Quenching Constant (kq) (1013 M−1 s−1) | Binding Constant (Kb) | Binding Site (n) | ∆G° (kJ mol−1) | ∆S° (J mol−1 K−1) | ∆H° (kJ mol−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex | 285 | 1.6763 | 6.8359 × 104 | 0.9631 | −26.100 | ||
| 292 | 1.3531 | 1.0363 × 105 | 0.9878 | −28.036 | +335.928 | +69.429 | |
| 299 | 1.0862 | 2.1217 × 105 | 0.9982 | −31.086 | |||
| Complex | 285 | 1.4802 | 2.1547 × 104 | 0.8695 | −23.642 | ||
| 292 | 1.2245 | 3.2151 × 104 | 0.8732 | −25.195 | +383.182 | +85.617 | |
| 299 | 1.0114 | 1.1752 × 105 | 0.9937 | −29.010 |
Figure 4The binding poses of the metal complexes 1 (A) and 2 (B) into the DNA duplex obtained from molecular docking analysis.The binding poses of the metal complexes 1 (C) and 2 (D) into the BSA obtained from molecular docking analysis. (For clarity the hydrogen atoms of the metal complexes are omitted).
Figure 5(A1). Morphological assessment of control (A1 c; the cells are viable as inferred from the green fluorescence) and treated (A1, 1 complex 1; & A1, 2 complex 2) A549 lung cancer cells. (A2) The graph shows data on percentage of cells that are normal and those afflicted with apoptosis and necrosis in the control and 24 h treated groups. (A3) The effects of complexes 1 and 2 on the cell cycle progression in lung cancer A549 cells. (A4) The bar diagram displays higher percentage of cells in sub G0 − G1 and G2-M phases after treatment of A549 cancer cells with complexes 1 and 2. The cell cycle distribution was analyzed using Dean-Jett-Fox software and depicted as the histogram. (A5) The vascular sprouting has been damaged (marked by arrows) on exposure to complexes 1 and 2 (10 μM) compared to control at 0 h (C, 1 and 2) after 6 h (C′, 1′ and 2′) of treatment. (A6) The different angiogenic parameters such as vessel length, vessel size and number of junctions decreased on exposure to complexes 1 and 2 compared to control. (Data are expressed in Mean ± SD).