| Literature DB >> 27942176 |
R K Marikanty1, M K Gupta2, S V B Cherukuvada1, S S S Kompella3, A K Prayaga4, S Konda1, R V Polisetty1, M M Idris1, P V Rao5, G R Chandak1, K V Dakshinamurty6.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease. Although several parameters are used to evaluate renal damage, in many instances, there is no pathological change until damage is already advanced. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is a novel tool to identify newer diagnostic markers. To identify urinary proteins associated with renal complications in diabetes, we collected urine samples from 10 type 2 diabetes patients each with normoalbuminuria, micro- and macro-albuminuria and compared their urinary proteome with that of 10 healthy individuals. Urinary proteins were concentrated, depleted of albumin and five other abundant plasma proteins and in-gel trypsin digested after prefractionation on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The peptides were analyzed using a nanoflow reverse phase liquid chromatography system coupled to linear trap quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We identified large number of proteins in each group, of which many were exclusively present in individual patient groups. A total of 53 proteins were common in all patients but were absent in the controls. The majority of the proteins were functionally binding, biologically involved in metabolic processes, and showed enrichment of alternative complement and blood coagulation pathways. In addition to identifying reported proteins such as α2-HS-glycoprotein and Vitamin D binding protein, we detected novel proteins such as CD59, extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1), factor H, and myoglobin in the urine of macroalbuminuria patients. ECM1 and factor H are known to influence mesangial cell proliferation, and CD59 causes microvascular damage by influencing membrane attack complex deposition, suggestive their biological relevance to DN. Thus, we have developed a proteome database where various proteins exclusively present in the patients may be further investigated for their role as stage-specific markers and possible therapeutic targets.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Orbitrap; diabetic nephropathy; liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; microalbuminuria; urinary proteomics
Year: 2016 PMID: 27942176 PMCID: PMC5131383 DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.176144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Nephrol ISSN: 0971-4065
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population
Figure 1Gene ontology-based classification of urinary proteins identified in macroalbuminuria group. (a) Sub-cellular localization, (b) molecular function, and (c) biological process
Figure 2Comparison of gene ontology-based classification of urinary proteins among different groups. (a) Sub-cellular localization, (b) molecular function, and (c) biological process
Figure 3Venn diagram representing comparison of urinary proteins identified in various diabetic groups with the control group. Numbers in parentheses represent proteins identified in each group, whereas those within circle represent proteins unique to the specific group. The intersect region of the circles shows proteins common to two comparison groups
Figure 4Venn diagram representing comparison of urinary proteome studies of all four groups. Numbers in parentheses represent proteins identified in each group, whereas those within circle represent proteins unique to the specific group. The intersect region of the circles shows proteins common to all diabetic groups
List of total proteins identified in all type 2 diabetes groups
Details of urinary proteins identified in MA patients and common to earlier studies