Visith Thongboonkerd1, Kenneth R McLeish, John M Arthur, Jon B Klein. 1. Core Proteomics Laboratory and Molecular Signaling Group, Kidney Disease Program, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, 570 South Preston Street, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proteomic techniques have recently become available for large-scale protein analysis. The utility of these techniques in identification of urinary proteins is poorly defined. We constructed a proteome map of normal human urine as a reference protein database by using two differential fractionated techniques to isolate the proteins. METHODS: Proteins were isolated from urine obtained from normal human volunteers by acetone precipitation or ultracentrifugation, separated by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) and identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry followed by peptide mass fingerprinting. RESULTS: A total of 67 protein forms of 47 unique proteins were identified, including transporters, adhesion molecules, complement, chaperones, receptors, enzymes, serpins, cell signaling proteins and matrix proteins. Acetone precipitated more acidic and hydrophilic proteins, whereas ultracentrifugation fractionated more basic, hydrophobic, and membrane proteins. Bioinformatic analysis predicted glycosylation to be the most common explanation for multiple forms of the same protein. CONCLUSIONS: Combining two differential isolation techniques magnified protein identification from human urine. Proteomic analysis of urinary proteins is a promising tool to study renal physiology and pathophysiology and to determine biomarkers of renal disease.
BACKGROUND: Proteomic techniques have recently become available for large-scale protein analysis. The utility of these techniques in identification of urinary proteins is poorly defined. We constructed a proteome map of normal human urine as a reference protein database by using two differential fractionated techniques to isolate the proteins. METHODS: Proteins were isolated from urine obtained from normal human volunteers by acetone precipitation or ultracentrifugation, separated by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) and identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry followed by peptide mass fingerprinting. RESULTS: A total of 67 protein forms of 47 unique proteins were identified, including transporters, adhesion molecules, complement, chaperones, receptors, enzymes, serpins, cell signaling proteins and matrix proteins. Acetone precipitated more acidic and hydrophilic proteins, whereas ultracentrifugation fractionated more basic, hydrophobic, and membrane proteins. Bioinformatic analysis predicted glycosylation to be the most common explanation for multiple forms of the same protein. CONCLUSIONS: Combining two differential isolation techniques magnified protein identification from human urine. Proteomic analysis of urinary proteins is a promising tool to study renal physiology and pathophysiology and to determine biomarkers of renal disease.
Authors: Maryam Afkarian; Manoj Bhasin; Simon T Dillon; Manuel C Guerrero; Robert G Nelson; William C Knowler; Ravi Thadhani; Towia A Libermann Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Joshua B Owen; Fabio Di Domenico; Rukhsana Sultana; Marzia Perluigi; Chiara Cini; William M Pierce; D Allan Butterfield Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Richard S Lee; Flavio Monigatti; Andrew C Briscoe; Zachary Waldon; Michael R Freeman; Hanno Steen Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Joshua B Owen; Wycliffe O Opii; Charles Ramassamy; William M Pierce; D Allan Butterfield Journal: Brain Res Date: 2008-09-12 Impact factor: 3.252