| Literature DB >> 19833879 |
José María Moreno-Navarrete1, Rubén Martínez-Barricarte, Victoria Catalán, Mònica Sabater, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi, Francisco José Ortega, Wifredo Ricart, Mathias Blüher, Gema Frühbeck, Santiago Rodríguez de Cordoba, José Manuel Fernández-Real.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Activation of the alternative pathway of the complement system, in which factor H (fH; complement fH [CFH]) is a key regulatory component, has been suggested as a link between obesity and metabolic disorders. Our objective was to study the associations between circulating and adipose tissue gene expressions of CFH and complement factor B (fB; CFB) with obesity and insulin resistance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Circulating fH and fB were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 398 subjects. CFH and CFB gene expressions were evaluated in 76 adipose tissue samples, in isolated adipocytes, and in stromovascular cells (SVC) (n = 13). The effects of weight loss and rosiglitazone were investigated in independent cohorts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19833879 PMCID: PMC2797922 DOI: 10.2337/db09-0700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
Clinical characteristics of subjects in the cross-sectional study
| NGT | AGT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 140 | 258 | — | |
| Age (years) | 48.8 ± 11.2 | 55.5 ± 12.7 | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.7 ± 3.7 | 28.9 ± 5.2 | <0.0001 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.97 ± 0.07 | <0.0001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 122.9 ± 14.6 | 139.8 ± 20.3 | <0.0001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77.9 ± 10.7 | 81.8 ± 10.2 | 0.001 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 92.15 ± 8.05 | 160.3 ± 82.9 | <0.0001 |
| A1C (%) | 4.7 ± 0.32 | 7.01 ± 1.8 | <0.0001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 204.05 ± 35 | 205.5 ± 37.9 | 0.7 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 53.8 ± 13.02 | 48.3 ± 12.4 | <0.0001 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 132.5 ± 31.6 | 120.2 ± 38.9 | 0.002 |
| Log 10 fasting triglycerides (mg/dl) | 1.9 ± 0.24 | 2.2 ± 0.27 | <0.0001 |
| sTNFR2 (ng/ml) | 6.49 ± 3.5 | 8.02 ± 5.25 | 0.001 |
| LBP (μg/ml) | 19.7 ± 13.9 | 44.2 ± 29.4 | <0.0001 |
| Log insulin sensitivity index | 0.58 ± 0.2 | 0.34 ± 0.18 | <0.0001 |
| 175.2 ± 53.4 | 195.4 ± 63.5 | 0.01 | |
| 231.95 ± 58.8 | 285.9 ± 90.5 | <0.0001 |
Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated.
*Insulin sensitivity was measured in 147 subjects (83 subjects with NGT and 64 subjects with AGT) using the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.
FIG. 1.Linear relationships between CFH and CFB with BMI and log insulin sensitivity index (derived from the minimal model).
Correlation between CFH concentrations and study variables in the cross-sectional study
| All subjects | NGT | AGT | All subjects | NGT | AGT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 398 | 140 | 258 | 398 | 140 | 258 | |||||||
| Age (years) | 0.03 | 0.5 | −0.19 | 0.07 | 0.3 | 0.07 | 0.2 | −0.12 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | < | < | ||||||||||
| Waist-to-hip ratio | < | < | ||||||||||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | < | −0.03 | 0.7 | < | −0.04 | 0.6 | ||||||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | −0.05 | 0.5 | −0.04 | 0.6 | ||||||||
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | −0.01 | 0.9 | 0.03 | 0.7 | < | 0.05 | 0.6 | 0.12 | 0.08 | |||
| A1C (%) | 0.04 | 0.4 | −0.1 | 0.2 | −0.04 | 0.5 | < | −0.07 | 0.4 | |||
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 0.01 | 0.9 | 0.04 | 0.6 | −0.01 | 0.8 | −0.08 | 0.2 | 0.09 | 0.3 | − | |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | − | < | −0.15 | 0.07 | − | − | < | 0.01 | 0.9 | − | < | |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | −0.08 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.8 | −0.1 | 0.2 | − | < | 0.08 | 0.4 | − | |
| Log fasting triglycerides (mg/dl) | < | 0.15 | 0.07 | < | < | 0.07 | 0.4 | < | ||||
| sTNFR2 (ng/ml) | 0.1 | 0.2 | < | 0.06 | 0.5 | |||||||
| LBP (μg/ml) | < | 0.08 | 0.4 | < | 0.08 | 0.4 | < | |||||
| Log insulin sensitivity index | − | < | − | − | − | < | − | − | ||||
| fH (μg/ml) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.65 | < | 0.63 | < | 0.64 | < |
*Insulin sensitivity was measured in 147 subjects (83 subjects with NTG and 64 subjects with AGT) using the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Significant data are shown in bold.
Correlation between omental and subcutaneous CFB and CFH expression and selected metabolic parameters
| Omental | Subcutaneous | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | −0.07 | 0.7 | −0.12 | 0.5 | −0.25 | 0.17 | − | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.23 | 0.18 | −0.02 | 0.9 | −0.01 | 0.9 | ||
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 0.25 | 0.16 | −0.02 | 0.93 | −0.14 | 0.4 | ||
| Fasting insulin (mU/l) | 0.11 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.85 | 0.22 | 0.25 | ||
| HOMA-IR | 0.13 | 0.5 | 0.08 | 0.66 | 0.15 | 0.4 | ||
| Fasting triglycerides (mg/dl) | 0.02 | 0.9 | −0.04 | 0.87 | −0.2 | 0.37 | ||
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | −0.34 | 0.1 | −0.07 | 0.7 | 0.02 | 0.9 | ||
Significant data are shown in bold.
Complement factor expression according to insulin resistance status
| Subjects with HOMA value <3.9 | Subjects with HOMA value >3.9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 18 | ||
| Omental | 0.35 ± 0.16 | 0.59 ± 0.12 | 0.003 |
| Omental | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.08 |
| Subcutaneous | 0.56 ± 0.19 | 0.57 ± 0.22 | 0.9 |
| Subcutaneous | 0.0137 ± 0.08 | 0.0136 ± 0.06 | 0.9 |
Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated.
FIG. 2.Study of CFH and CFB relative gene expression in SVC and adipocytes from omental (OM) and subcutaneous (SC) fat depots.
Subject characteristics in the weight loss study
| Baseline | Post-weight loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 42 | ||
| Age (years) | 43.1 ± 15 | 43.1 ± 15 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 36.3 ± 8.4 | 30.3 ± 5.3 | <0.0001 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.95 ± 0.08 | 0.93 ± 0.07 | 0.01 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 126.2 ± 15.9 | 119.7 ± 12.7 | 0.015 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 80.6 ± 9.6 | 75.7 ± 6.8 | 0.003 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 95.5 ± 10.7 | 90.1 ± 7.9 | 0.008 |
| Insulin (mU/l) | 17.9 ± 13.8 | 11.7 ± 6.1 | 0.04 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 204.4 ± 35.8 | 175.6 ± 25.3 | <0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 53.4 ± 12.4 | 51.5 ± 11.7 | 0.23 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 129.02 ± 32.9 | 107.9 ± 22.9 | <0.0001 |
| Log 10 fasting triglycerides (mg/dl) | 2.04 ± 1.6 | 1.9 ± 1.48 | <0.0001 |
| QUICKI | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.01 |
| HOMA-IR | 4.2 ± 3.4 | 2.56 ± 1.4 | 0.04 |
| fH (μg/ml) | 264.7 ± 59.3 | 235.15 ± 72 | 0.009 |
| fB (μg/ml) | 304.26 ± 75.5 | 274.3 ± 67 | 0.025 |
Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated.
FIG. 3.Baseline linear relationships between CFH and CFB with BMI, waist circumference, and insulin sensitivity (QUICKI) in the weight loss study.
FIG. 4.Changes in circulating CFH (A) and CFB (B) from baseline (gray lines) to after weight loss (black lines) in all subjects (left panels) and according to age (right panels). Subjects were classified into younger and older than 42 years (median age of the cohort).
FIG. 5.A: Linear relationship between the change in circulating fH (%) and the change in glucose infusion rate (%) during the clamp (r = −0.49; P = 0.02). B: 95% CI for the mean of the percent change in circulating fH (black lines) and glucose infusion rate (gray lines) after rosiglitazone and in control subjects.