Literature DB >> 27939387

Combining electron microscopy with single molecule DNA fiber approaches to study DNA replication dynamics.

Alessandro Vindigni1, Massimo Lopes2.   

Abstract

Replication stress is a crucial driver of genomic instability. Understanding the mechanisms of replication stress response is instrumental to improve diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Electron microscopy (EM) is currently the technique of choice to directly visualize a high number of replication intermediates and to monitor their remodeling upon stress. At the same time, DNA fiber analysis is useful to gain mechanistic insight on how genotoxic agents perturb replication fork dynamics genome-wide at single-molecule resolution. Combining these techniques has proven invaluable to achieve a comprehensive view of the mechanisms that ensure error-free processing of damaged replication forks. Here, we review how EM and single-molecule DNA fiber approaches can be used together to shed light into the mechanisms of replication stress response and discuss important cautions to be taken into account when comparing results obtained by EM and DNA fiber.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939387      PMCID: PMC5457720          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2016.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Chem        ISSN: 0301-4622            Impact factor:   2.352


  61 in total

1.  Characterization of monoclonal antibody to DNA.RNA and its application to immunodetection of hybrids.

Authors:  S J Boguslawski; D E Smith; M A Michalak; K E Mickelson; C O Yehle; W L Patterson; R J Carrico
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  The DNA translocase FANCM/MHF promotes replication traverse of DNA interstrand crosslinks.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Shuo Liu; Marina A Bellani; Arun Kalliat Thazhathveetil; Chen Ling; Johan P de Winter; Yinsheng Wang; Weidong Wang; Michael M Seidman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Replication stress interferes with histone recycling and predeposition marking of new histones.

Authors:  Zuzana Jasencakova; Annette N D Scharf; Katrine Ask; Armelle Corpet; Axel Imhof; Geneviève Almouzni; Anja Groth
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins at replication forks and in assembled chromatin using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA.

Authors:  Bianca M Sirbu; Frank B Couch; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Manuel Luís Orta; Natalia Issaeva; Niklas Schultz; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Authors:  Michelle K Zeman; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Cooperation of RAD51 and RAD54 in regression of a model replication fork.

Authors:  Dmitry V Bugreev; Matthew J Rossi; Alexander V Mazin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  An antibody-based microarray assay for small RNA detection.

Authors:  Zonglin Hu; Aixia Zhang; Gisela Storz; Susan Gottesman; Stephen H Leppla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells.

Authors:  D A Jackson; A Pombo
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-03-23       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Immunodetection of human topoisomerase I-DNA covalent complexes.

Authors:  Anand G Patel; Karen S Flatten; Kevin L Peterson; Thomas G Beito; Paula A Schneider; Angela L Perkins; Daniel A Harki; Scott H Kaufmann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Authors:  Darshil R Patel; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 2.  Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.

Authors:  Sarah A Joseph; Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Jen-Wei Huang; Raquel Cuella-Martin; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-08-15

Review 3.  Genomic instability and innate immune responses to self-DNA in progeria.

Authors:  Susana Gonzalo; Nuria Coll-Bonfill
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 7.713

4.  Studying Single-Stranded DNA Gaps at Replication Intermediates by Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Jessica Jackson; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Hallmarks of DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Sneha Saxena; Lee Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 6.  To skip or not to skip: choosing repriming to tolerate DNA damage.

Authors:  Annabel Quinet; Stephanie Tirman; Emily Cybulla; Alice Meroni; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  A game of substrates: replication fork remodeling and its roles in genome stability and chemo-resistance.

Authors:  Julia Sidorova
Journal:  Cell Stress       Date:  2017-12-05

Review 8.  Homologous recombination deficiency: how genomic signatures are generated.

Authors:  Jeremy Setton; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Simon N Powell
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 9.  The Replication Stress Response on a Narrow Path Between Genomic Instability and Inflammation.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 10.  Single-Molecule Techniques to Study Chromatin.

Authors:  Anna Chanou; Stephan Hamperl
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.