Rongrong Zhou1, Zhongxing Liao2, Tinsu Pan3, Sarah A Milgrom2, Chelsea C Pinnix2, Anhui Shi2, Linglong Tang2, Ju Yang2, Ying Liu2, Daniel Gomez2, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen2, Bouthaina S Dabaja2, Laurence Court4, Jinzhong Yang5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. 3. Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. Electronic address: jyang4@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a set of atlases for auto-contouring cardiac substructures. METHODS: Eight radiation oncologists manually and independently delineated 15 cardiac substructures from noncontrast CT images of 6 patients by referring to their respective fused contrast CT images. Individual contours were fused together for each structure, edited by 2 physicians, and became atlases to delineate other 6 patients. The auto-delineated contours of the 6 additional patients became templates for manual contouring. These 12 patients with well-defined contours composed the final atlases for multi-atlas segmentation. RESULTS: The average time for manually contouring the 15 cardiac substructures was about 40min. Inter-observer variability was small for the heart, the chambers, and the aorta compared with that for other structures that were not clearly distinguishable in CT images. The mean dice similarity coefficient and mean surface distance of auto-segmented contours were within one standard deviation of expert contouring variability. Good agreement between auto-segmented and manual contours was observed for the heart, the chambers, and the great vessels. Independent validation on other 19 patients showed reasonable agreement for the heart chambers. CONCLUSIONS: A set of cardiac atlases was created for auto-contouring from noncontrast CT images. The accuracy of auto-contouring for the heart, chambers, and great vessels was validated for potential clinical use.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a set of atlases for auto-contouring cardiac substructures. METHODS: Eight radiation oncologists manually and independently delineated 15 cardiac substructures from noncontrast CT images of 6 patients by referring to their respective fused contrast CT images. Individual contours were fused together for each structure, edited by 2 physicians, and became atlases to delineate other 6 patients. The auto-delineated contours of the 6 additional patients became templates for manual contouring. These 12 patients with well-defined contours composed the final atlases for multi-atlas segmentation. RESULTS: The average time for manually contouring the 15 cardiac substructures was about 40min. Inter-observer variability was small for the heart, the chambers, and the aorta compared with that for other structures that were not clearly distinguishable in CT images. The mean dice similarity coefficient and mean surface distance of auto-segmented contours were within one standard deviation of expert contouring variability. Good agreement between auto-segmented and manual contours was observed for the heart, the chambers, and the great vessels. Independent validation on other 19 patients showed reasonable agreement for the heart chambers. CONCLUSIONS: A set of cardiac atlases was created for auto-contouring from noncontrast CT images. The accuracy of auto-contouring for the heart, chambers, and great vessels was validated for potential clinical use.
Authors: Giovanna Gagliardi; Louis S Constine; Vitali Moiseenko; Candace Correa; Lori J Pierce; Aaron M Allen; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: He Wang; Lei Dong; Ming Fwu Lii; Andrew L Lee; Renaud de Crevoisier; Radhe Mohan; James D Cox; Deborah A Kuban; Rex Cheung Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jinzhong Yang; Wendy A Woodward; Valerie K Reed; Eric A Strom; George H Perkins; Welela Tereffe; Thomas A Buchholz; Lifei Zhang; Peter Balter; Laurence E Court; X Allen Li; Lei Dong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Liza J Stapleford; Joshua D Lawson; Charles Perkins; Scott Edelman; Lawrence Davis; Mark W McDonald; Anthony Waller; Eduard Schreibmann; Tim Fox Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Senem Demirci; Jiho Nam; Jessica L Hubbs; Thu Nguyen; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sarah C Darby; David J Cutter; Marjan Boerma; Louis S Constine; Luis F Fajardo; Kazunori Kodama; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Lawrence B Marks; Fred A Mettler; Lori J Pierce; Klaus R Trott; Edward T H Yeh; Roy E Shore Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Vy Bui; Sujata M Shanbhag; Oscar Levine; Matthew Jacobs; W Patricia Bandettini; Lin-Ching Chang; Marcus Y Chen; Li-Yueh Hsu Journal: IEEE Access Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Eric D Morris; Ahmed I Ghanem; Milan V Pantelic; Eleanor M Walker; Xiaoxia Han; Carri K Glide-Hurst Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Matthew J Ferris; Katherine S Martin; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Oluwatosin A Kayode; Jonathan Wolf; Quang Dang; Robert H Press; Walter J Curran; Kristin A Higgins Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-05-09
Authors: Jinzhong Yang; Benjamin Haas; Raymond Fang; Beth M Beadle; Adam S Garden; Zhongxing Liao; Lifei Zhang; Peter Balter; Laurence Court Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Eric D Morris; Ahmed I Ghanem; Ming Dong; Milan V Pantelic; Eleanor M Walker; Carri K Glide-Hurst Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-12-29 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Yongbin Zhang; Lifei Zhang; Laurence E Court; Peter Balter; Lei Dong; Jinzhong Yang Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Kai Huang; Dong Joo Rhee; Rachel Ger; Rick Layman; Jinzhong Yang; Carlos E Cardenas; Laurence E Court Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 2.102