Jinzhong Yang1, Harini Veeraraghavan2, Wouter van Elmpt3, Andre Dekker3, Mark Gooding4, Greg Sharp5. 1. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. Mirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, UK. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Automatic segmentation offers many benefits for radiotherapy treatment planning; however, the lack of publicly available benchmark datasets limits the clinical use of automatic segmentation. In this work, we present a well-curated computed tomography (CT) dataset of high-quality manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic normal tissue auto-segmentation systems. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 60 patients undergoing treatment simulation for thoracic radiotherapy were acquired from three institutions: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the MAASTRO clinic. Each institution provided CT scans from 20 patients, including mean intensity projection four-dimensional CT (4D CT), exhale phase (4D CT), or free-breathing CT scans depending on their clinical practice. All CT scans covered the entire thoracic region with a 50-cm field of view and slice spacing of 1, 2.5, or 3 mm. Manual contours of left/right lungs, esophagus, heart, and spinal cord were retrieved from the clinical treatment plans. These contours were checked for quality and edited if necessary to ensure adherence to RTOG 1106 contouring guidelines. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The CT images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest were named according to the nomenclature recommended by American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263 as Lung_L, Lung_R, Esophagus, Heart, and SpinalCord. This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (funded by the National Cancer Institute) under Lung CT Segmentation Challenge 2017 (http://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.3r3fvz08). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset provides CT scans with well-delineated manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate auto-segmentation systems. Additional anatomies could be supplied in the future to enhance the existing library of contours.
PURPOSE: Automatic segmentation offers many benefits for radiotherapy treatment planning; however, the lack of publicly available benchmark datasets limits the clinical use of automatic segmentation. In this work, we present a well-curated computed tomography (CT) dataset of high-quality manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic normal tissue auto-segmentation systems. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 60 patients undergoing treatment simulation for thoracic radiotherapy were acquired from three institutions: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the MAASTRO clinic. Each institution provided CT scans from 20 patients, including mean intensity projection four-dimensional CT (4D CT), exhale phase (4D CT), or free-breathing CT scans depending on their clinical practice. All CT scans covered the entire thoracic region with a 50-cm field of view and slice spacing of 1, 2.5, or 3 mm. Manual contours of left/right lungs, esophagus, heart, and spinal cord were retrieved from the clinical treatment plans. These contours were checked for quality and edited if necessary to ensure adherence to RTOG 1106 contouring guidelines. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The CT images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest were named according to the nomenclature recommended by American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263 as Lung_L, Lung_R, Esophagus, Heart, and SpinalCord. This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (funded by the National Cancer Institute) under Lung CT Segmentation Challenge 2017 (http://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.3r3fvz08). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset provides CT scans with well-delineated manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate auto-segmentation systems. Additional anatomies could be supplied in the future to enhance the existing library of contours.
Authors: Gary A Ezzell; James M Galvin; Daniel Low; Jatinder R Palta; Isaac Rosen; Michael B Sharpe; Ping Xia; Ying Xiao; Lei Xing; Cedric X Yu Journal: Med Phys Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Patrik F Raudaschl; Paolo Zaffino; Gregory C Sharp; Maria Francesca Spadea; Antong Chen; Benoit M Dawant; Thomas Albrecht; Tobias Gass; Christoph Langguth; Marcel Lüthi; Florian Jung; Oliver Knapp; Stefan Wesarg; Richard Mannion-Haworth; Mike Bowes; Annaliese Ashman; Gwenael Guillard; Alan Brett; Graham Vincent; Mauricio Orbes-Arteaga; David Cárdenas-Peña; German Castellanos-Dominguez; Nava Aghdasi; Yangming Li; Angelique Berens; Kris Moe; Blake Hannaford; Rainer Schubert; Karl D Fritscher Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Liza J Stapleford; Joshua D Lawson; Charles Perkins; Scott Edelman; Lawrence Davis; Mark W McDonald; Anthony Waller; Eduard Schreibmann; Tim Fox Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jinzhong Yang; Benjamin Haas; Raymond Fang; Beth M Beadle; Adam S Garden; Zhongxing Liao; Lifei Zhang; Peter Balter; Laurence Court Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Hekun Jin; Susan L Tucker; Hui Helen Liu; Xiong Wei; Sue Sun Yom; Shulian Wang; Ritsuko Komaki; Yuhchyau Chen; Mary K Martel; Radhe Mohan; James D Cox; Zhongxing Liao Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2008-10-18 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Charles S Mayo; Jean M Moran; Walter Bosch; Ying Xiao; Todd McNutt; Richard Popple; Jeff Michalski; Mary Feng; Lawrence B Marks; Clifton D Fuller; Ellen Yorke; Jatinder Palta; Peter E Gabriel; Andrea Molineu; Martha M Matuszak; Elizabeth Covington; Kathryn Masi; Susan L Richardson; Timothy Ritter; Tomasz Morgas; Stella Flampouri; Lakshmi Santanam; Joseph A Moore; Thomas G Purdie; Robert C Miller; Coen Hurkmans; Judy Adams; Qing-Rong Jackie Wu; Colleen J Fox; Ramon Alfredo Siochi; Norman L Brown; Wilko Verbakel; Yves Archambault; Steven J Chmura; Andre L Dekker; Don G Eagle; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Theodore Hong; Rishabh Kapoor; Beth Lansing; Shruti Jolly; Mary E Napolitano; James Percy; Mark S Rose; Salim Siddiqui; Christof Schadt; William E Simon; William L Straube; Sara T St James; Kenneth Ulin; Sue S Yom; Torunn I Yock Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dong Joo Rhee; Carlos E Cardenas; Hesham Elhalawani; Rachel McCarroll; Lifei Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; Adam S Garden; Christine B Peterson; Beth M Beadle; Laurence E Court Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Petr Jordan; Philip M Adamson; Vrunda Bhattbhatt; Surabhi Beriwal; Sangyu Shen; Oskar Radermecker; Supratik Bose; Linda S Strain; Michael Offe; David Fraley; Sara Principi; Dong Hye Ye; Adam S Wang; John van Heteren; Nghia-Jack Vo; Taly Gilat Schmidt Journal: Med Phys Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Minsong Cao; Bradley Stiehl; Victoria Y Yu; Ke Sheng; Amar U Kishan; Robert K Chin; Yingli Yang; Dan Ruan Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 6.244