Literature DB >> 2793615

A computational model for rate-level functions from cat auditory-nerve fibers.

M B Sachs1, R L Winslow, B H Sokolowski.   

Abstract

A computationally tractable form of the rate-level model proposed by Sachs and Abbas (1974) is presented. The first stage of the model is a compressive nonlinearity whose input-output function is chosen to reflect current data on basilar-membrane displacement. The output of this nonlinearity is converted to driven discharge rate by the saturating nonlinearity originally used by Sachs and Abbas (1974). In fitting the model to data four model parameters are chosen to minimize the mean squared error between rate functions generated by the model and the data. With parameters chosen in this way, the model provides good fits to the range of rate-level shapes from flat saturations to sloping saturations. One important parameter in the model is the 'threshold for compression'. For low- and medium-spontaneous rate fibers with similar best frequencies (BFs), the minimum mean squared error compression threshold is roughly constant at about 30 dB above the thresholds of the most sensitive (high-spontaneous rate) fibers at that BF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2793615     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90179-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

Authors:  C Köppl; G Yates
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A unified mechanism for spontaneous-rate and first-spike timing in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Dynamic encoding of amplitude-modulated sounds at the level of auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  L K Rimskaya-Korsakova; V N Telepnev; N A Dubrovksii
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01

4.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

5.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  A model of selective processing of auditory-nerve inputs by stellate cells of the antero-ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Y C Lai; R L Winslow; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Computer simulation of shared input among projection neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  K A Davis; H F Voigt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Contribution of Cochlear Compression to Discrimination of Rippled Spectra in On- and Low-frequency Noise.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-21

10.  Representation of Vowel-like Spectra by Discharge Rate Responses of Individual Auditory-Nerve Fibers.

Authors:  Glenn LE Prell; Murray Sachs; Bradford May
Journal:  Audit Neurosci       Date:  1996-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.