Literature DB >> 27928465

Gene expression and pathway analysis of CTNNB1 in cancer and stem cells.

Shihori Tanabe1, Takeshi Kawabata1, Kazuhiko Aoyagi1, Hiroshi Yokozaki1, Hiroki Sasaki1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate β-catenin (CTNNB1) signaling in cancer and stem cells, the gene expression and pathway were analyzed using bioinformatics.
METHODS: The expression of the catenin β 1 (CTNNB1) gene, which codes for β-catenin, was analyzed in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and gastric cancer (GC) cells. Beta-catenin signaling and the mutation of related proteins were also analyzed using the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics and HOMology modeling of Complex Structure (HOMCOS) databases.
RESULTS: The expression of the CTNNB1 gene was up-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs. The expression of EPH receptor A8 (EPHA8), synovial sarcoma translocation chromosome 18 (SS18), interactor of little elongation complex ELL subunit 1 (ICE1), patched 1 (PTCH1), mutS homolog 3 (MSH3) and caspase recruitment domain family member 11 (CARD11) were also shown to be altered in GC cells in the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics analysis. 3D complex structures were reported for E-cadherin 1 (CDH1), lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1), transcription factor 7 like 2 (TCF7L2) and adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC) with β-catenin.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related gene CTNNB1 plays an important role in the regulation of stem cell pluripotency and cancer signaling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTNNB1; Epithelial-mesenchymal transition; Mesenchymal stem cell; Stem cell; β-catenin

Year:  2016        PMID: 27928465      PMCID: PMC5120243          DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v8.i11.384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Stem Cells        ISSN: 1948-0210            Impact factor:   5.326


Core tip: β-catenin signaling consists of several pathway cascades, such as those that are involved in pluripotent stem cell generation and cancer. Several genes, including EPHA8, SS18, ICE1, PTCH1, MSH3 and CARD11, are mutated along with CTNNB1. The expression of the CTNNB1, CDH1, MYC, LEF1 and TCF7L2 genes, which are related to the CTNNB1 network, is up-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to MSCs. 3D complex structures for β-catenin (CTNB1_HUMAN) with LEF_MOUSE and TF7L2_HUMAN were found using the HOMCOS database. The EMT-related gene CTNNB1 plays an important role in pluripotent stem cell signaling and cancer signaling.

INTRODUCTION

Changes in the phenotypes of cancer and stem cells are related to changes in gene expression and protein signaling. This study aims to reveal the β-catenin (CTNNB1) regulation in diffuse-type gastric cancer (GC) cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Wnt/β-catenin signaling is necessary for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMT)[1]. Stem cell division is strongly correlated with cancer risk, and this highlights the importance of molecular signaling in stem cells and cancer cells[2]. Epigenetics and stem cell functions are regulated by several exogenous stimuli, including cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions[3]. To ensure the safety of therapeutic stem cell applications in terms of stem cell modification, an understanding of the regulation of the stem cells and their niche is necessary[4]. In the case of bone metastasis, the tissue-specific stromal response for prostate cancer can be identified by a molecular signature for which a novel mechanism has been revealed in hematopoietic and prostate epithelial stem cell niches[5]. Cancer stem cell (CSC) maintenance requires hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-α transcription factors and the inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (ID2)[6]. The down-regulated expression of ID2 is associated with a poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma[7]. Because the compendium of gene expression, chromosomal copy number and sequencing data from human cancer cell lines, which is called the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), has revealed that genomic data are capable of predicting anti-cancer drug sensitivity, molecular and network analyses should be carried out[8]. It has been reported that cadherin 1 (CDH1) is up-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to MSCs[9]. However, CDH2 was down-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to MSCs; this provides a useful indicator - the ratio of CDH2 to CDH1 expression - to distinguish the mesenchymal and epithelial phenotypes of the cells[9]. It has been reported that catenin β 1 (CTNNB1) is mutated in hepatocellular carcinoma[10,11]. To further elucidate the EMT phenotype and the molecules that are involved in β-catenin signaling in cancer, the CTNNB1 network and the β-catenin binding partners have been investigated in this report using bioinformatics tools such as microarray analysis and databases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gene expression analysis of MSCs and diffuse-type GC cells

Gene expression in MSCs (n = 12) and diffuse-type GC cells (n = 5) was analyzed using Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays, as previously described[9,12]. In brief, total RNA was purified from the cells, biotinylated and hybridized to microarrays. The signal intensity of each gene transcript was analyzed and compared between MSCs and diffuse-type GC cells. The microarray data for MSCs and diffuse-type GC cells are available to the public in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and are accessible via GEO Series accession number GSE7888 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE7888) and GSE42252 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE42252), respectively[9,12].

Diffuse-type GC tissues

Diffuse-type GC tissues were originally provided by the National Cancer Center Hospital after obtaining written informed consent from each patient and approval by National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board. All cancer specimens were reviewed and classified histopathologically according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer. Tissue specimens were immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen after surgical extraction, and stored at -80 °C until microarray analysis[9,13]. The existing data already available to the public were analyzed in the article.

Analysis of cancer genomics using cBioPortal

The cancer genomics data analysis was performed relative to CTNNB1 using the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (http://www.cbioportal.org)[14,15]. The term “CTNNB1” was searched in the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics database, and a cross-cancer alteration summary was obtained for CTNNB1. A study on stomach adenocarcinoma was further analyzed for enrichments[16]. Genes with mutations that were enriched in samples that contained altered CTNNB1 were selected in the cBioPortal for cancer genomics for further study.

3D complex structures

3D complex structures were searched in the HOMology modeling of COmplex Structure (HOMCOS) database (http://homcos.pdbj.org) using the search engine that was provided by the VaProS server (http://pford.info/vapros)[17]. The UniProtID “CTNB_HUMAN” was input as the query for the “searching contact molecule” field of the HOMCOS. Only close homologues (sequence identity > 95%) were selected. The complex structures that were found were superimposed using the MATRAS program[18].

Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as the mean ± SE. For the statistics, Student’s t test was used. P < 0.01 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Expression of EMT-related genes in MSCs and diffuse-type GC cells

The expression of EMT-related genes in MSCs and diffuse-type GC cells is shown in Figure 1. The genes for which probe sets included the “EMT” term in the Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process field were selected as EMT-related genes. The average signal intensity for early-stage MSCs, late-stage MSCs, or GC cells was greater than 500. Panel A shows the results of a cluster analysis of 39 probe sets that were up-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to early-stage MSCs (n = 6 in early-stage MSCs, n = 6 in late-stage MSCs, n = 5 in GC). Panel B shows the results of a cluster analysis of 46 probe sets that were down-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to early-stage MSCs (n = 6 in early-stage MSCs, n = 6 in late-stage MSCs, n = 5 in GC). To evaluate CTNNB1 expression in cancer and stem cells, the expression of the CTNNB1 gene was compared in MSCs and diffuse-type GC cells, and the results indicate that CTNNB1 is up-regulated in GC cells (Figure 2). One of the probe sets was up-regulated more than 8-fold over its expression level in MSCs, whereas the other probe sets showed no increases in expression in GC cells compared to MSCs.
Figure 1

Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related genes in mesenchymal stem cells and diffuse-type gastric cancer cells. Cluster analysis of gene expression in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and diffuse-type gastric cancer (GC) cells. A: The result of the cluster analysis of 39 probe sets that were up-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to early-stage MSCs (n = 6 in early-stage MSCs, n = 6 in late-stage MSCs, n = 5 in GC); B: The result of the cluster analysis of 46 probe sets that were down-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to early-stage MSCs (n = 6 in early-stage MSCs, n = 6 in late-stage MSCs, n = 5 in GC). The probe sets with epithelial to mesenchymal transition in the Gene Ontology Biological Process were selected (the average signal intensity in early-stage MSCs, late-stage MSCs, or GC cells is greater than 500).

Figure 2

CTNNB1 expression in mesenchymal stem cells and diffuse-type gastric cancer cells. CTNNB1 gene expression was up-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs. The signal intensity of probe set ID 223679_at was up-regulated more than 8-fold in GC cells compared to MSCs, whereas the signal intensity in probe set ID 201533_at was unchanged (n = 12 in MSC, n = 5 in GC, aP < 0.01 in t test). GC: Gastric cancer; MSCs: Mesenchymal stem cells.

Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related genes in mesenchymal stem cells and diffuse-type gastric cancer cells. Cluster analysis of gene expression in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and diffuse-type gastric cancer (GC) cells. A: The result of the cluster analysis of 39 probe sets that were up-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to early-stage MSCs (n = 6 in early-stage MSCs, n = 6 in late-stage MSCs, n = 5 in GC); B: The result of the cluster analysis of 46 probe sets that were down-regulated in diffuse-type GC cells compared to early-stage MSCs (n = 6 in early-stage MSCs, n = 6 in late-stage MSCs, n = 5 in GC). The probe sets with epithelial to mesenchymal transition in the Gene Ontology Biological Process were selected (the average signal intensity in early-stage MSCs, late-stage MSCs, or GC cells is greater than 500). CTNNB1 expression in mesenchymal stem cells and diffuse-type gastric cancer cells. CTNNB1 gene expression was up-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs. The signal intensity of probe set ID 223679_at was up-regulated more than 8-fold in GC cells compared to MSCs, whereas the signal intensity in probe set ID 201533_at was unchanged (n = 12 in MSC, n = 5 in GC, aP < 0.01 in t test). GC: Gastric cancer; MSCs: Mesenchymal stem cells.

3D complex structures of β-catenin

To verify and explore protein-protein interactions with β-catenin, 3D complex structures of β-catenin were found using the HOMCOS database (http://homcos.pdbj.org)[17] and are summarized in Table 1. Figure 3 shows the superimposed 3D structure of the complex. Most of the proteins bind to the inner concave surface of the armadillo repeat region of β-catenin by using their 40-60 residue length extended peptides [adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC), E-cadherin 1 (CDH1), catenin beta interacting protein 1 (CTNNBIP1), lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1), transcription factor 7 like 1 (TCF7L1) and transcription factor 7 like 2 (TCF7L2)]. CDH1 and B-cell CLL/lymphoma 9 (BCL9) bind to the N-terminal region of the repeat that has the alpha-helical peptides. The nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 2 (NR5A2) ligand binding domain binds to the middle of the armadillo repeat region. Of these binding factors, the transcription of the CDH1, LEF1 and TCF7L2 genes was up-regulated in GC cells (Table 1). It has been reported that a small molecule antagonist of the β-catenin/T-cell transcription factor 4 [TCF4; official name is transcription factor 7 like 2 (TCF7L2)] interaction inhibits self-renewal of CSCs and suppresses tumorigenesis[19]. The 3D complex structures of β-catenin and TCF7L2 are available[20,21]. The complex structure of NR5A2 has also been reported[22]. NR5A2 (or liver receptor homolog-1; LRH1) is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor family of transcription factors that play essential roles in development, metabolism, and cancer and are implicated in Wnt/β-catenin signaling[22]. NR5A2 is essential for the early development and maintenance of pluripotent mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells[22,23]. Network models for CTNNB1, the Wnt signaling pathway, Hippo signaling pathway and adherens junction signaling in cancer are shown in Figure 4. CTNNB1 binds to CDH1 near the cellular membrane or to TCF to transcribe anti-apoptotic or pro-proliferation genes, such as SRY-box 2 (SOX2) or v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC) (Figure 4). Wnt stimulation prevents glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) from phosphorylating CTNNB1 and leads to CTNNB1 translocation into the nucleus to induce transcription. The 3D complex structure (PDB code: 1m1e) clearly shows how CDH1 binds to CTNNB1 in the mouse model.
Table 1

3D complex structures of β-catenin (CTNNB1) and interacting proteins

pdb_idβ-catenin (CTNNB1)
Proteins that interact with β-catenin
ChainIDLengthUniProtIDMoleculeChainIDLengthUniProtIDContact protein nameRegulation of gene expression in GC cells compared to MSCs
1th1B513CTNB1_HUMANAPCD54APC_HUMANAdenomatous polyposis coli proteinNot changed/-
1qz7A524CTNB1_HUMANAXIN1B17AXN_XENLAAxin-1-
3sl9B165CTNB1_HUMANBCL9D23BCL9_HUMANB-cell CLL/lymphoma 9 protein-
1i7wC509CTNB1_MOUSECDH1D60CADH1_MOUSECadherin-1Up-regulated
1m1eA512CTNB1_MOUSECTNNBIP1B65CNBP1_HUMANBeta-catenin-interacting protein 1-
3ouxA503CTNB1_MOUSELEF1B47LEF1_MOUSELymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1Up-regulated
3tx7A504CTNB1_HUMANNR5A2B218NR5A2_HUMANNuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 2-
1g3jA439CTNB1_HUMANTCF7L1B34T7L1A_XENLATranscription factor 7-like 1-A-
1jdhA508CTNB1_HUMANTCF7L2B38TF7L2_HUMANTranscription factor 7-like 2Up-regulated
1dowB32CTNB1_MOUSECTNNA1A205CTNA1_MOUSECatenin alpha-1Not changed/-
4onsD56CTNB1_MOUSECTNNA2C230CTNA2_MOUSECatenin alpha-2-
Figure 3

3D structures of β-catenin (CTNNB1) binding proteins. Each CTNNB1 complex structure was superimposed onto the CTNNB1 structure in a complex with APC (PDB code: 1th1), using the program MATRAS (From Ref. [18]). Colors and PDB codes are summarized as follows: White: CTNNB1 (CTNB1_HUMAN, 1th1); red: APC (APC_HUMAN, 1th1); orange: AXIN1 (AXN_XELNA, 1qz7); hot pink: BCL9 (BCL9_HUMAN, 3sl9); green: CDH1 (CADH1_MOUSE. 1i7w); cyan: CTNNBIP1 (CNBP1_HUMAN, 1m1e); magenta: LEF1 (LEF1_MOUSE, 3oux); forest green: NR5A2 (NR5A2_HUMAN, 3tx7); yellow: TCF7L1 (T7L1A_XENLA, 1g3j); blue: TCF7L2 (TF7L2_HUMAN, 1jdh).

Figure 4

Network model for CTNNB1. The molecular network model for CTNNB1 signaling is shown. The extracted networks for pathways in cancer, Hippo signaling pathway and the Wnt signaling pathway (KEGG) were merged and are shown in a molecular network model. Wnt signaling and adherens junction molecules cross-talk via CTNNB1. Activated CTNNB1 induces the transcription of anti-apoptosis genes and pro-proliferation genes.

3D complex structures of β-catenin (CTNNB1) and interacting proteins 3D structures of β-catenin (CTNNB1) binding proteins. Each CTNNB1 complex structure was superimposed onto the CTNNB1 structure in a complex with APC (PDB code: 1th1), using the program MATRAS (From Ref. [18]). Colors and PDB codes are summarized as follows: White: CTNNB1 (CTNB1_HUMAN, 1th1); red: APC (APC_HUMAN, 1th1); orange: AXIN1 (AXN_XELNA, 1qz7); hot pink: BCL9 (BCL9_HUMAN, 3sl9); green: CDH1 (CADH1_MOUSE. 1i7w); cyan: CTNNBIP1 (CNBP1_HUMAN, 1m1e); magenta: LEF1 (LEF1_MOUSE, 3oux); forest green: NR5A2 (NR5A2_HUMAN, 3tx7); yellow: TCF7L1 (T7L1A_XENLA, 1g3j); blue: TCF7L2 (TF7L2_HUMAN, 1jdh). Network model for CTNNB1. The molecular network model for CTNNB1 signaling is shown. The extracted networks for pathways in cancer, Hippo signaling pathway and the Wnt signaling pathway (KEGG) were merged and are shown in a molecular network model. Wnt signaling and adherens junction molecules cross-talk via CTNNB1. Activated CTNNB1 induces the transcription of anti-apoptosis genes and pro-proliferation genes.

CTNNB1 pathway (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes)

CTNNB1 is listed in 21 pathways in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), including the Rap1 signaling pathway, Wnt signaling pathway, Hippo signaling pathway, focal adhesion regulation, adherens junction regulation, tight junction regulation, signaling pathways that regulate the pluripotency of stem cells, leukocyte transendothelial migration, melanogenesis, the thyroid hormone signaling pathway; bacterial invasion of epithelial cells, pathogenic Escherichia coli infection, HTLV-I infection, and various cancer pathways. The following conditions use the aforementioned pathways and are also thus implicated: Proteoglycans in cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, basal cell carcinoma, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (http://www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/www_bget?hsa:1499). The inhibition of GSK3β kinase activates β-catenin, which stimulates endoderm induction via the degradation of Tcf7l1 and forkhead box A2 (FoxA2) expression[24]. Wnt signaling induces intracellular β-catenin signaling via GSK3β kinase inhibition and dephosphorylation of β-catenin[25-28]. The inhibition of β-catenin decreases proliferation and induces apoptosis in the mantle cell lymphoma cell line[29]. Noncanonical Wnt signaling is activated in circulating tumor cells from the prostate that are anti-androgen-resistant[30].

Mutations in CTNNB1 and related genes (cBioPortal: Stomach adenocarcinoma)

The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network project has indicated that there is a characteristic molecular signature for ras homolog family member A (RHOA) mutations in diffuse type stomach adenocarcinoma[16]. Two-hundred and ninety-five primary gastric adenocarcinomas have been investigated, and mutations in RHOA have been enriched in genomically stable subtype, diffuse-type GC cells[16]. The analysis with cBioPortal showed that CTNNB1 was altered in 24 (8%) of 287 cases/patients in stomach adenocarcinoma: 4 amplifications, 2 deep deletions, 12 missense mutations, 5 truncating mutations and 1 inframe mutation. Several gene mutations occurred concurrently with CTNNB1 alterations in stomach adenocarcinoma (Table 2). The development of mutations in EPH receptor A8 (EPHA8), synovial sarcoma translocation chromosome 18 (SS18), interactor of little elongator complex ELL subunit 1 (ICE1), patched 1 (PTCH1), mutS homolog 3 (MSH3) and caspase recruitment domain family member 11 (CARD11) occurred alongside the CTNNB1 alterations (Table 2). Of the mutated genes, PTCH1 expression was up-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs (Table 2). The GO of the mutated genes is shown in Table 3. EPHA8 possesses kinase activity, SS18 is involved in cell morphogenesis, ICE1 may play a role in positive regulation of intracellular protein transport, PTCH1 is involved in morphogenesis and cell growth, MSH3 is involved in mismatch repair, and CARD11 regulates B cell proliferation, apoptosis and NF-κB signaling, according to GO biological process (Table 3). GO biological process terms in Table 3 are based on Affymetrix annotation (http://www.affymetrix.com/estore/) and gene information in NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Table 2

Genes mutated along with the CTNNB1 alteration

Gene symbolGene titleCytobandMutation percentage
Log ratioP-valueRatio of GC cells to MSCs
In altered groupIn unaltered group
EPHA8EPH receptor A81p36.1229.17%2.28%3.681.45E-05Signal intensity is low
SS18Synovial sarcoma translocation Chromosome 1818q11.216.67%0.00%> 103.84E-050.6
1.4
ICE1Interactor of little elongator complex ELL subunit 15p15.3233.33%4.56%2.874.74E-051.5
PTCH1Patched 19q22.329.17%3.42%3.098.16E-0516.6
MSH3MutS homolog 35q14.120.83%1.14%4.191.28E-04Signal intensity is low
CARD11Caspase recruitment domain family, member 117p2229.17%4.18%2.82.03E-04Signal intensity is low
Table 3

Gene ontology of mutated genes along with CTNNB1 alteration

Gene symbolGene ontology biological process
EPHA8Protein phosphorylation // substrate-dependent cell migration // cell adhesion // transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway // multicellular organismal development // nervous system development // axon guidance // phosphorylation // neuron remodeling // peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation // regulation of cell adhesion // neuron projection development // regulation of cell adhesion mediated by integrin // positive regulation of MAPK cascade // positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity // protein autophosphorylation // ephrin receptor signaling pathway
SS18Microtubule cytoskeleton organization // cell morphogenesis // transcription, DNA-templated // regulation of transcription, DNA-templated // cytoskeleton organization // response to drug // positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter // ephrin receptor signaling pathway
ICE1Positive regulation of intracellular protein transport // positive regulation of protein complex assembly // positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase III promoter // snRNA transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter // snRNA transcription from RNA polymerase III promoter
PTCH1Negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter // branching involved in ureteric bud morphogenesis // neural tube formation // neural tube closure // heart morphogenesis // signal transduction // smoothened signaling pathway // smoothened signaling pathway // regulation of mitotic cell cycle // pattern specification process // brain development // negative regulation of cell proliferation // epidermis development // regulation of smoothened signaling pathway // response to mechanical stimulus // organ morphogenesis // dorsal/ventral pattern formation // response to chlorate // positive regulation of cholesterol efflux // response to organic cyclic compound // protein processing // spinal cord motor neuron differentiation // neural tube patterning // dorsal/ventral neural tube patterning // neural plate axis specification // embryonic limb morphogenesis // mammary gland development // response to estradiol // response to retinoic acid // regulation of protein localization // limb morphogenesis // hindlimb morphogenesis // regulation of growth // negative regulation of multicellular organism growth // regulation of cell proliferation // response to drug // glucose homeostasis // negative regulation of sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity // keratinocyte proliferation // negative regulation of osteoblast differentiation // negative regulation of smoothened signaling pathway // negative regulation of smoothened signaling pathway // negative regulation of epithelial cell proliferation // negative regulation of cell division // pharyngeal system development // mammary gland duct morphogenesis // mammary gland epithelial cell differentiation // smoothened signaling pathway involved in dorsal/ventral neural tube patterning // cell differentiation involved in kidney development // somite development // cellular response to cholesterol // cellular response to cholesterol // renal system development // cell proliferation involved in metanephros development // protein targeting to plasma membrane
MSH3Meiotic mismatch repair // ATP catabolic process // DNA repair // mismatch repair // cellular response to DNA damage stimulus // reciprocal meiotic recombination // somatic recombination of immunoglobulin gene segments // maintenance of DNA repeat elements // negative regulation of DNA recombination // positive regulation of helicase activity
CARD11Positive regulation of cytokine production // signal transduction // positive regulation of B cell proliferation // T cell costimulation // Fc-epsilon receptor signaling pathway // positive regulation of T cell proliferation // regulation of apoptotic process // positive regulation of I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB signaling // thymic T cell selection // positive regulation of interleukin-2 biosynthetic process // innate immune response // regulation of B cell differentiation // regulation of T cell differentiation // nucleotide phosphorylation // regulation of immune response // T cell receptor signaling pathway // positive regulation of T cell activation // positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activity
Genes mutated along with the CTNNB1 alteration Gene ontology of mutated genes along with CTNNB1 alteration

β-catenin signaling model

Several β-catenin-binding proteins, such as LEF1 or TCF7L2, share high mobility group (HMG)-box domains, which suggests that β-catenin signaling switches mechanisms with the binding of different transcription factors. 3D complex structures show that CDH1, LEF1 and TCF7L2 bind to β-catenin. The role of β-catenin signaling in the pluripotentcy pathway should be investigated to reveal its mechanism in cancer and stem cells. The Wnt pathway is located upstream, and TCF, downstream of CTNNB1 in the cascade[31]. The merged network model of the β-catenin signaling network and CDH1, together with molecules in the 3D complex structures and genes mutated along with the CTNNB1 alteration is shown in Figure 5A. The merged network model of the CTNNB1, Wnt, and TCF signaling networks and CDH1, together with molecules in the 3D complex structures and genes mutated along with the CTNNB1 alteration is shown in Figure 5B. Of the common genes, EPHA8, SS18 and PTCH1 interact with phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate-3-kinase catalytic subunit gamma (PIK3CG), SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4 (SMARCA4), and GLI family zinc finger 1 (GLI1), respectively, whereas CARD11, ICE1, MSH3 have no known interactions with molecules in the CTNNB1 network. The networks for stomach adenocarcinoma that were generated using cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics for CTNNB1 alone and for CTNNB1 with the 6 genes that are mutated along with the CTNNB1 alteration have been partially merged in Figure 5. Catenin delta 2 (CTNND2) and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) showed a relatively high frequency of mutation (> 15% in 287 tumor samples) in the analysis using cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics of the CTNNB1 network in stomach adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2014)[16]. The genes that were up-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs are shown in red, whereas the down-regulated genes are shown in light blue (Fold change > 2, P < 0.05, n = 12 in MSCs, n = 5 in GC; the average signal intensity of MSCs or GC cells is greater than 500). The expression of the CTNNB1, CDH1, notch1 (NOTCH1), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), PTCH1, discs large homolog 1, scribble cell polarity complex component (DLG1), LEF1, CTNND1, SMARCA4, nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCOA2), SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4), MYC, junction plakoglobin (JUP), TCF7L2 and ERBB2 genes was up-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs, whereas the expression of twist family bHLH transcription factor 1 (TWIST1) was down-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs. The expression of EPHA2 was up-regulated in some GC samples. The expression of the IQ motif-containing GTPase activating protein 1 (IQGAP1), SS18, ICE1, cortactin (CTTN), RHOA, CREB binding protein (CREBBP) and protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor (PTPN1) genes was not altered in MSCs and GC cells. The expression of the EPHA8, PIK3CG, CARD11, MSH3, GLI1, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), snail family zinc finger 1 (SNAI1) and CTNND2 genes was not examined due to a low signal intensity. The alteration frequencies of CTNND2 and ERBB2 are relatively high in the CTNNB1 network (> 15%), according to the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. Interestingly, IQGAP2 was up-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs.
Figure 5

Network model for CTNNB1 and related genes. A: Network model for CTNNB1 and genes mutated along with CTNNB1. The networks of extracted CTNNB1 with other mutated genes plus that of extracted CTNNB1 alone are shown (cBioPortal-oriented, Stomach Adenocarcinoma)[16]; B: Network model for CTNNB1 and 6 mutated genes. Wnt and LEF/TCF signaling are merged in CTNNB1 signaling (cBioPortal-oriented, Stomach Adenocarcinoma)[16].

Network model for CTNNB1 and related genes. A: Network model for CTNNB1 and genes mutated along with CTNNB1. The networks of extracted CTNNB1 with other mutated genes plus that of extracted CTNNB1 alone are shown (cBioPortal-oriented, Stomach Adenocarcinoma)[16]; B: Network model for CTNNB1 and 6 mutated genes. Wnt and LEF/TCF signaling are merged in CTNNB1 signaling (cBioPortal-oriented, Stomach Adenocarcinoma)[16].

DISCUSSION

In summary, the CTNNB1 gene expression was up-regulated in diffuse-type GC compared to MSC. The various molecules are regulated with CTNNB1, which suggests the CTNNB1 signaling network in cancer and stem cells. EMT-related genes have been reported to be induced by transforming growth factor (TGF)-β or epidermal growth factor (EGF), and genes in the Wnt signaling pathway are mutated in non-small cell lung cancer[32-34]. The expression of β-catenin was up-regulated in the TGF-β1-induced EMT model and was inhibited by cucurbitacin B treatment[32]. Solid tumors induce hypoxia, leading to HIF-1α protein regulation of molecules that are involved in angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, metabolism, cell survival and cell proliferation[35]. SNAI2 and TWIST1 were down-regulated in GC cells compared to MSCs, whereas SNAI1 expression was not detected because of low signal intensity[9,36,37]. Because SNAI and TWIST are associated with EMT, the regulation of their expression is important for understanding EMT mechanisms. Although 3D complex structures of SNAI2 and TWIST1 with β-catenin are not available, some indirect β-catenin signaling cascade may be involved in the SNAI2 and TWIST1 pathway[38,39]. TGFβ is also an important factor in EMT[40]. TGFβ regulates osteoblast differentiation, whereas calycosin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside-induced osteoblast differentiation is regulated via the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Wnt/β-catenin-signaling pathway[41]. The TGFβ-induced nuclear translocation of β-catenin has been reported to be one of the key factors that activates the EMT program[42-45]. Wnt/β-catenin is regulated in stem cells, and Wnt target genes are controlled by the TCF/β-catenin complex[46]. In gastrointestinal cancer, somatic mutations that provoke an immune response have been found in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which may be very specific to the individual and are targets for cancer immunotherapy[47]. KRAS-mutation-specific T cells, as well as personalized mutation-specific T cells, have been identified, and these may be useful in the future for individual cancer immunotherapeutics[47]. It has been reported that Helicobacter pylori up-regulates Nanog and Oct4 expression via Wnt/β-catenin signaling[48]. Wnt/β-catenin signaling and the phosphorylation of β-catenin may be involved in stemness in gastric cancer[48]. In conclusion, CTNNB1 plays an important role in the regulation of stem cell pluripotency and cancer signaling. For future direction, precise analyses of Wnt signaling, Notch signaling, and Ephrin signaling are needed to reveal the entire picture of β-catenin signaling in cancer and stem cells. RHO mutations, and regulator of G-protein signaling, with network analysis tools, such as Cytoscape, must be investigated for a greater understanding of this process.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Professor Kei Yura for introducing the VaProS database. This study used VaProS, a data-cloud developed by the Information Core of the Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).

COMMENTS

Background

β-catenin signaling is essential in pluripotent stem cells and cancer. It is also involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMT). CTNNB1 is activated by Wnt, and the binding of CTNNB1 to transcription factors leads to pluripotent gene regulation.

Research frontiers

The regulation of pluripotency and proliferation is important for elucidating the mechanism of cell phenotype transitions. The EMT mechanism should be investigated to better understand cancer resistance to therapeutics.

Innovations and breakthroughs

The 3D complex structures of β-catenin and related molecules were studied using molecular networks, which is an innovation in the field. The mutated genes that were altered along with CTNNB1 in stomach adenocarcinoma samples were also investigated.

Applications

These results may affect the study of the pluripotency mechanism and potential therapeutic predictions of gastric cancer. The genes in the molecular network that are related to CTNNB1 may be the targets of predictive medicine for cancer and disease using pluripotent cells.

Terminology

EMT is a cellular phenotype of a transition from an epithelial to a mesenchymal cell type. EMT is regulated in cancer metastasis and malignancy, and it is related to the acquisition of resistance in cancer cells to therapeutics. It is important to understand the EMT mechanism to understand the mechanisms of cancer resistance.

Peer-review

In general, the manuscript is interesting not only for scientific reasons, but also due to its potential clinical relevance, since it provides some light about the relationships between stem and cancer cells.
  48 in total

1.  AACR special conference on epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer progression and treatment.

Authors:  Evanthia T Roussos; Zuzana Keckesova; John D Haley; David M Epstein; Robert A Weinberg; John S Condeelis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Signaling involved in stem cell reprogramming and differentiation.

Authors:  Shihori Tanabe
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Kinetic responses of β-catenin specify the sites of Wnt control.

Authors:  Ana R Hernández; Allon M Klein; Marc W Kirschner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Tcf4 can specifically recognize beta-catenin using alternative conformations.

Authors:  T A Graham; D M Ferkey; F Mao; D Kimelman; W Xu
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-12

5.  Regulated genes in mesenchymal stem cells and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shihori Tanabe; Kazuhiko Aoyagi; Hiroshi Yokozaki; Hiroki Sasaki
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/Tcf complex.

Authors:  T A Graham; C Weaver; F Mao; D Kimelman; W Xu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-12-08       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  FAK/PYK2 promotes the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and intestinal tumorigenesis by phosphorylating GSK3β.

Authors:  Chenxi Gao; Guangming Chen; Shih-Fan Kuan; Dennis Han Zhang; David D Schlaepfer; Jing Hu
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Wnt signaling pathway pharmacogenetics in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D J Stewart; D W Chang; Y Ye; M Spitz; C Lu; X Shu; J A Wampfler; R S Marks; Y I Garces; P Yang; X Wu
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.550

9.  RNA-Seq of single prostate CTCs implicates noncanonical Wnt signaling in antiandrogen resistance.

Authors:  David T Miyamoto; Yu Zheng; Ben S Wittner; Richard J Lee; Huili Zhu; Katherine T Broderick; Rushil Desai; Douglas B Fox; Brian W Brannigan; Julie Trautwein; Kshitij S Arora; Niyati Desai; Douglas M Dahl; Lecia V Sequist; Matthew R Smith; Ravi Kapur; Chin-Lee Wu; Toshi Shioda; Sridhar Ramaswamy; David T Ting; Mehmet Toner; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance.

Authors:  Kari R Fischer; Anna Durrans; Sharrell Lee; Jianting Sheng; Fuhai Li; Stephen T C Wong; Hyejin Choi; Tina El Rayes; Seongho Ryu; Juliane Troeger; Robert F Schwabe; Linda T Vahdat; Nasser K Altorki; Vivek Mittal; Dingcheng Gao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stem-like Cells from Invasive Breast Carcinoma Cell Line MDA-MB-231 Express a Distinct Set of Eph Receptors and Ephrin Ligands.

Authors:  Mariana Lucero; Jaspreet Thind; Jacqueline Sandoval; Shayan Senaati; Belinda Jimenez; Raj P Kandpal
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 2.  The paradox of cancer genes in non-malignant conditions: implications for precision medicine.

Authors:  Jacob J Adashek; Shumei Kato; Scott M Lippman; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 11.117

3.  Trichoblastic carcinosarcoma with panfollicular differentiation (panfollicular carcinosarcoma) and CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) mutation.

Authors:  Jenny Giang; Asok Biswas; Antien L Mooyaart; Floris H Groenendijk; Petra Dikrama; Jeffrey Damman
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 1.587

4.  Short-Term Ex Vivo Culture of CTCs from Advance Breast Cancer Patients: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Nuria Carmona-Ule; Miriam González-Conde; Carmen Abuín; Juan F Cueva; Patricia Palacios; Rafael López-López; Clotilde Costa; Ana Belén Dávila-Ibáñez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Data mining analysis of the prognostic impact of N6-methyladenosine regulators in patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Junyu Zhai; Shang Li; Yu Li; Yanzhi Du
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Personalized Network Modeling of the Pan-Cancer Patient and Cell Line Interactome.

Authors:  Rupam Bhattacharyya; Min Jin Ha; Qingzhi Liu; Rehan Akbani; Han Liang; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-05

7.  Integration of gene co-expression analysis and multi-class SVM specifies the functional players involved in determining the fate of HTLV-1 infection toward the development of cancer (ATLL) or neurological disorder (HAM/TSP).

Authors:  Mohadeseh Zarei Ghobadi; Rahman Emamzadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identification of a competing endogenous RNA axis "SVIL-AS1/miR-103a/ICE1" associated with chemoresistance in lung adenocarcinoma by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Lili Guo; Lina Ding; Junfang Tang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.