Nuria Carmona-Ule1, Miriam González-Conde1,2, Carmen Abuín1, Juan F Cueva2,3, Patricia Palacios2,3, Rafael López-López1,2,3, Clotilde Costa1,2, Ana Belén Dávila-Ibáñez1. 1. Roche-Chus Joint Unit, Translational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. 2. CIBERONC, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, 28029 Madrid, Spain. 3. Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Medical Oncology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have relevance as prognostic markers in breast cancer. However, the functional properties of CTCs or their molecular characterization have not been well-studied. Experimental models indicate that only a few cells can survive in the circulation and eventually metastasize. Thus, it is essential to identify these surviving cells capable of forming such metastases. METHODS: We isolated viable CTCs from 50 peripheral blood samples obtained from 35 patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer using RosetteSepTM for ex vivo culture. The CTCs were seeded and monitored on plates under low adherence conditions and with media supplemented with growth factors and Nanoemulsions. Phenotypic analysis was performed by immunofluorescence and gene expression analysis using RT-PCR and CTCs counting by the Cellsearch® system. RESULTS: We found that in 75% of samples the CTC cultures lasted more than 23 days, predicting a shorter Progression-Free Survival in these patients, independently of having ≥5 CTC by Cellsearch®. We also observed that CTCs before and after culture showed a different gene expression profile. CONCLUSIONS: the cultivability of CTCs is a predictive factor. Furthermore, the subset of cells capable of growing ex vivo show stem or mesenchymal features and may represent the CTC population with metastatic potential in vivo.
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have relevance as prognostic markers in breast cancer. However, the functional properties of CTCs or their molecular characterization have not been well-studied. Experimental models indicate that only a few cells can survive in the circulation and eventually metastasize. Thus, it is essential to identify these surviving cells capable of forming such metastases. METHODS: We isolated viable CTCs from 50 peripheral blood samples obtained from 35 patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer using RosetteSepTM for ex vivo culture. The CTCs were seeded and monitored on plates under low adherence conditions and with media supplemented with growth factors and Nanoemulsions. Phenotypic analysis was performed by immunofluorescence and gene expression analysis using RT-PCR and CTCs counting by the Cellsearch® system. RESULTS: We found that in 75% of samples the CTC cultures lasted more than 23 days, predicting a shorter Progression-Free Survival in these patients, independently of having ≥5 CTC by Cellsearch®. We also observed that CTCs before and after culture showed a different gene expression profile. CONCLUSIONS: the cultivability of CTCs is a predictive factor. Furthermore, the subset of cells capable of growing ex vivo show stem or mesenchymal features and may represent the CTC population with metastatic potential in vivo.
Entities:
Keywords:
CTC; breast cancer; cell culture; liquid biopsy
Authors: Martin Cegan; Katarina Kolostova; Rafal Matkowski; Marek Broul; Jan Schraml; Marek Fiutowski; Vladimir Bobek Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2014-09-15
Authors: Tais Pereira-Veiga; Manuel Abreu; Diego Robledo; Xavier Matias-Guiu; María Santacana; Laura Sánchez; Juan Cueva; Patricia Palacios; Ihab Abdulkader; Rafael López-López; Laura Muinelo-Romay; Clotilde Costa Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-12-16 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Katarina Kolostova; Rafal Matkowski; Robert Gürlich; Krzysztof Grabowski; Katarzyna Soter; Robert Lischke; Jan Schützner; Vladimir Bobek Journal: Cytotechnology Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Howard I Scher; R Bruce Montgomery; Christopher Parker; M Craig Miller; Henk Tissing; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen; Kenneth J Pienta; Derek Raghavan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Min Yu; Aditya Bardia; Nicola Aceto; Francesca Bersani; Marissa W Madden; Maria C Donaldson; Rushil Desai; Huili Zhu; Valentine Comaills; Zongli Zheng; Ben S Wittner; Petar Stojanov; Elena Brachtel; Dennis Sgroi; Ravi Kapur; Toshihiro Shioda; David T Ting; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Gad Getz; A John Iafrate; Cyril Benes; Mehmet Toner; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daniel A Haber Journal: Science Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: William W Feng; Owen Wilkins; Scott Bang; Matthew Ung; Jiaqi Li; Jennifer An; Carmen Del Genio; Kaleigh Canfield; James DiRenzo; Wendy Wells; Arti Gaur; R Brooks Robey; Jessie Yanxiang Guo; Ryan L Powles; Christos Sotiriou; Lajos Pusztai; Maria Febbraio; Chao Cheng; William B Kinlaw; Manabu Kurokawa Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Nuria Carmona-Ule; Noga Gal; Carmen Abuín Redondo; María De La Fuente Freire; Rafael López López; Ana Belén Dávila-Ibáñez Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2022-08-10