| Literature DB >> 27926533 |
Po-Yu Yang1,2,3, Pei-Ling Hsieh4, Tong Hong Wang5,6,7, Cheng-Chia Yu1,2,4,3, Ming-Yi Lu1,2,4,3, Yi-Wen Liao1, Tzu-Hsin Lee1,2, Chih-Yu Peng1,2,4,3.
Abstract
Current evidence suggests that oral cancer stem cells (OCSCs) possess high tumorigenic and metastatic properties as well as chemo- and radioresistance. In this study, we demonstrated that andrographolide, the main bioactive component in the medicinal plant Andrographis, significantly reduced oncogenicity and restored radio-sensitivity of ALDH1+CD44+ OCSCs. Mechanistic studies showed that andrographolide treatment increased the expression of microRNA-218 (miR-218), leading to the downregulation of Bmi1. We showed that knockdown of miR-218 in ALDH1-CD44- non-OCSCs enhanced cancer stemness, while silencing of Bmi1 significantly counteracted it. Furthermore, we found tumor growth was reduced in mice bearing xenograft tumors after andrographolide treatment via activation of miR-218/Bmi1 axis. Together, these data demonstrated that the inhibition of tumor aggressiveness in OCSCs by andrographolide was mediated through the upregulation of miR-218, thereby reducing Bmi1 expression. These findings suggest that andrographolide may be a valuable natural compound for anti-CSCs treatment of OSCC.Entities:
Keywords: andrographolide; cancer stemness; miR-218; oral squamous cell carcinomas
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27926533 PMCID: PMC5354823 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The cytotoxicity and effect of andrographolide on OCSCs self-renewal property
(A)The chemical structure of andrographolide; (B) NHOK cells and two ALDH+CD44+ OCSCs from primary cultivated OSCC were treated with various concentrations of andrographolide for 24 hr followed by MTT assay; (C) OCSCs treated with or without andrographolide were subjected to a secondary sphere-forming assay. The number of spheres was calculated and data was presented as percentage of control. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared to control.
Figure 2The effect of andrographolide on cancer stemness marker expression
(A)The ALDH1 activity and (B) CD44 positivity of OCSCs treated with or without andrographolide was assessed by flow cytometry and data was presented as percentage of control; (B) mRNA and (C) protein expressions of the stemness markers (Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2) in andrographolide-treated OCSCs. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared to control.
Figure 3Anti-oncogenic effect of andrographolide in OCSCs Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of
(A) migration assay, (B) Matrigel invasion assay and (C) soft agar colony formation assay of OCSCs treated with various concentration of andrographolide. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared to control.
Figure 4The effect of andrographolide on radio-sensitivity of OCSC
(A)The surviving fractions of cancer cells or andrographolide-treated OCSCs were evaluated after various doses of radiation exposure; (B) Invasion and (C) colony-forming ability in OCSCs were examined after treatment with either andrographolide/radiotherapy alone or combination of both. *p < .05 andrographolide alone vs. control; #p < .05 andrographolide+ IR vs. andrographolide alone.
Figure 5Identification of Bmi18 as a direct target of miR-218 in OCSCs
(A) miR-218 expression in andrographolide-treated OCSCs; (B) Schematic representation of the constructed Bmi1 3′UTR reporter plasmids; (C) The wild-type or mutant form of Bmi1 reporter was co-transfected with miR-218 or empty vector (Mock) into OCSCs. The luciferase activity was assessed and presented as relative units to Mock-treated cells; (D) mRNA expression of miR-218 and (E) protein expression of Bmi1 in OCSCs transfected with pLV-miR-scrambled (pLV-miR-Scr.) or pLV-miR-218; (F) Survival fraction of pLV-miR-Scr or pLV-miR-218-treated OCSCs after various doses of radiation. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared to control.
Figure 6Involvement of Bmi1 in tumor suppressive function of miR-218
(A) Protein expression of Bmi1, (B) sphere formation, (C) wound-healing and (D) invasion ability in ALDH1−CD44− non cancer stem cells (non-CSC) transfected with Spg-Ctl, Spg-miR-218, sh-Luc or sh-Bmi1. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared to Spg.Ctrl.;# p < .05 Spg. 218+sh-Bmi1 compared to Spg. 218+sh-Luc.
Figure 7Inhibition of tumor growth by Andrographolide via miR-21/Bmi1 axis
(A) Quantification of tumor volume changes following administration of Andrographolide; (B) relative miR-218 expression and (C) Bmi1 expression in the excised tumors. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared to control.