Literature DB >> 27915367

The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects.

Justin Munafo1, Meg Diedrick1, Thomas A Stoffregen2.   

Abstract

Anecdotal reports suggest that motion sickness may occur among users of contemporary, consumer-oriented head-mounted display systems and that women may be at greater risk. We evaluated the nauseogenic properties of one such system, the Oculus Rift. The head-mounted unit included motion sensors that were sensitive to users' head movements, such that head movements could be used as control inputs to the device. In two experiments, seated participants played one of two virtual reality games for up to 15 min. In Experiment 1, 22% of participants reported motion sickness, and the difference in incidence between men and women was not significant. In Experiment 2, motion sickness was reported by 56% of participants, and incidence among women (77.78%) was significantly greater than among men (33.33%). Before participants were exposed to the head-mounted display system, we recorded their standing body sway during the performance of simple visual tasks. In both experiments, patterns of pre-exposure body sway differed between participants who (later) reported motion sickness and those who did not. In Experiment 2, sex differences in susceptibility to motion sickness were preceded by sex differences in body sway. These postural effects confirm a prediction of the postural instability theory of motion sickness. The results indicate that users of contemporary head-mounted display systems are at significant risk of motion sickness and that in relation to motion sickness these systems may be sexist in their effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motion sickness; Posture; Sex differences; Virtual environments

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27915367     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4846-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Aftereffects and sense of presence in virtual environments: formulation of a research and development agenda.

Authors:  K Stanney; G Salvendy; J Deisinger; P DiZio; S Ellis; J Ellison; G Fogleman; J Gallimore; M Singer; L Hettinger; R Kennedy; J Lackner; B Lawson; J Maida; A Mead; M Mon-Williams; D Newman; T Piantanida; L Reeves; O Riedel; T Stoffregen; J Wann; R Welch; J Wilson; B Witmer
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Interact       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.353

2.  Postural instability precedes motion sickness.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen; L J Smart
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Motion sickness preceded by unstable displacements of the center of pressure.

Authors:  Cedrick T Bonnet; Elise Faugloire; Michael A Riley; Benoît G Bardy; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Body load and the postural precursors of motion sickness.

Authors:  Frank C Koslucher; Eric J Haaland; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  The distance of visual targets affects the spatial magnitude and multifractal scaling of standing body sway in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Justin Munafo; Christopher Curry; Michael G Wade; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The motion of a ship at sea and the consequent motion sickness amongst passengers.

Authors:  A Lawther; M J Griffin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A survey of the occurrence of motion sickness amongst passengers at sea.

Authors:  A Lawther; M J Griffin
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1988-05

9.  Sex differences in visual performance and postural sway precede sex differences in visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Frank Koslucher; Eric Haaland; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The influence of center-of-mass movements on the variation in the structure of human postural sway.

Authors:  Espen A F Ihlen; Nina Skjæret; Beatrix Vereijken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  41 in total

1.  Resting-state functional connectivity predicts recovery from visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Jungo Miyazaki; Hiroki Yamamoto; Yoshikatsu Ichimura; Hiroyuki Yamashiro; Tomokazu Murase; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Masahiro Umeda; Toshihiro Higuchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Predicting vection and visually induced motion sickness based on spontaneous postural activity.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Benjamin Arcioni; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Postural time-to-contact as a precursor of visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Ruixuan Li; Hannah Walter; Christopher Curry; Ruth Rath; Nicolette Peterson; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of virtual reality technology locomotive multi-sensory motion stimuli on a user simulator sickness and controller intuitiveness during a navigation task.

Authors:  Cassandra N Aldaba; Zahra Moussavi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Can virtual reality really be used within the lecture theatre?

Authors:  Andrew Graham Davies; Nick J Crohn; Laura Anne Treadgold
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2019-09-19

6.  Sex Moderates the Relationship between Perceptual-Motor Function and Single-Leg Squatting Mechanics.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hogg; Jason M Avedesian; Jed A Diekfuss; Shellie N Acocello; Rylee D Shimmin; Elisabeth A Kelley; Deborah A Kostrub; Gregory D Myer; Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Eye-Movements During Navigation in a Virtual Environment: Sex Differences and Relationship to Sex Hormones.

Authors:  TiAnni Harris; Johanna Hagg; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Exploring structural relations among computer self-efficacy, perceived immersion, and intention to use virtual reality training systems.

Authors:  Tao Xie; Ling Zheng; Geping Liu; Leping Liu
Journal:  Virtual Real       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.697

9.  Clinical predictors of cybersickness in virtual reality (VR) among highly stressed people.

Authors:  Hyewon Kim; Dong Jun Kim; Won Ho Chung; Kyung-Ah Park; James D K Kim; Dowan Kim; Kiwon Kim; Hong Jin Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Using Positive Attribute Framing to Attenuate Nocebo Side Effects: A Cybersickness Study.

Authors:  Alanna Mao; Kirsten Barnes; Louise Sharpe; Andrew L Geers; Suzanne G Helfer; Kate Faasse; Ben Colagiuri
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.