Literature DB >> 27913314

Audiologic characteristics in a sample of recently-separated military Veterans: The Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study (NOISE Study).

J S Gordon1, S E Griest2, E J Thielman3, K F Carlson4, W J Helt3, M S Lewis2, C Blankenship3, D Austin5, S M Theodoroff2, J A Henry2.   

Abstract

Military Service Members are often exposed to high levels of occupational noise, solvents, and other exposures that can be damaging to the auditory system. Little is known about hearing loss and how it progresses in Veterans following military service. This epidemiology study is designed to evaluate and monitor a cohort of Veterans for 20 years or more to determine how hearing loss changes over time and how those changes are related to noise exposure and other ototoxic exposures encountered during military service. Data reported here are from baseline assessments of the first 100 study participants (84 males; 16 females; mean age 33.5 years; SD 8.8; range 21-58). Each participant was asked to complete a comprehensive audiologic examination and self-report questionnaires regarding sociodemographic characteristics, noise and solvent exposures, health conditions common among post-deployment Veterans, and the social and emotional consequences of hearing loss. For this relatively young cohort, 29% exhibited hearing loss, defined as average hearing threshold >20 dB HL in the conventional audiometric range. Forty-two percent exhibited hearing loss in the extended-high-frequency audiometric range using the same criterion (average hearing threshold >20 dB HL). Certain factors were found to be associated with poorer hearing in both conventional and extended-high-frequency ranges, including age, type of military branch, years of military service, number of military deployments, noise exposure, tinnitus, and a positive screen for post-traumatic stress disorder. Although the majority of participants had hearing within normal limits, 27% reported a self-perceived mild/moderate hearing handicap and 14% reported a significant handicap. Further research is needed to identify a cause for this discrepancy in audiologic results versus self-report. The information obtained from this longitudinal study could be used in future resource planning with the goal of preventing, as much as possible, the development of hearing loss during military service, and the exacerbation of prevalent hearing loss after military service and over Veterans' lifetimes. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiometry; Hearing loss; Noise exposure; TBI; Tinnitus; Veterans

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27913314     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  M D Valero; J A Burton; S N Hauser; T A Hackett; R Ramachandran; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and its Prevention: Current Issues in Mammalian Hearing.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-07-12

3.  Evoked Potentials Reveal Noise Exposure-Related Central Auditory Changes Despite Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Naomi F Bramhall; Christopher E Niemczak; Sean D Kampel; Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Tinnitus and Auditory Perception After a History of Noise Exposure: Relationship to Auditory Brainstem Response Measures.

Authors:  Naomi F Bramhall; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Effects of Recreational Noise on Threshold and Suprathreshold Measures of Auditory Function.

Authors:  Angela N C Fulbright; Colleen G Le Prell; Scott K Griffiths; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

Review 7.  2,4 Dinitrophenol as Medicine.

Authors:  John G Geisler
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  The Immediate and Long-Term Impact of Military Aircraft Noise on Hearing: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Fighter Pilots and Ground Staff.

Authors:  Chao-Yin Kuo; Chia-Lien Hung; Hsin-Chien Chen; Cheng-Ping Shih; Rou-Huei Lu; Chen-Wai Chen; Li-Wen Hung; Yi-Chun Lin; Hang-Kang Chen; Da-Ming Chu; Yuan-Yung Lin; Yueh-Chun Chen; Chih-Hung Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 7.468

10.  Relationship Between Subjective Reports of Temporary Threshold Shift and the Prevalence of Hearing Problems in Military Personnel.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Mary E Barrett; Jaclyn Schurman; Benjamin Sheffield; Leilani Ramos; Roberta Martorana; Hector Galloza
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.