Literature DB >> 33799421

The Immediate and Long-Term Impact of Military Aircraft Noise on Hearing: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Fighter Pilots and Ground Staff.

Chao-Yin Kuo1,2, Chia-Lien Hung3, Hsin-Chien Chen1, Cheng-Ping Shih1, Rou-Huei Lu1, Chen-Wai Chen4, Li-Wen Hung1, Yi-Chun Lin5, Hang-Kang Chen1,3, Da-Ming Chu4, Yuan-Yung Lin1,5, Yueh-Chun Chen4, Chih-Hung Wang1,3,5.   

Abstract

We examined the immediate and long-term impacts of military aircraft noise exposure on noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in fighter pilots and ground staff. We recruited 40 pilots, 40 ground staff, and 136 age-matched controls; all participants underwent hearing tests, including conventional pure-tone audiometry (PTA) (0.25-8.0 kHz), extended high-frequency (EHF) audiometry (9.0-18.0 kHz), and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) as a recent reference. A subsequent hearing test immediately after flight-mission noise exposure was requested. The results revealed higher recent hearing thresholds in pilots and ground staff than in controls. Threshold shifts at many octave band frequencies were also significantly elevated in ground staff. The grouped frequency threshold was significantly elevated in the 4-8 kHz high-frequency range. After a single flight-mission noise exposure, both ground staff and pilots showed decreased signal-to-noise ratios for DPOAE (1-8 kHz), whereas only ground staff showed significantly elevated left-ear hearing thresholds at 3, 11.2, and 12.5 kHz by conventional and EHF PTA. Fighter pilots and ground staff serve in hazardous noise-exposed environments that cause hearing damage and subsequent NIHL, but ground staff may be more vulnerable. A comprehensive hearing conservation program should be implemented to protect high-risk service members, and especially ground staff, from high-intensity noise exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs); extended high-frequency (EHF) audiometry; fighter aircraft; ground staff; military noise; noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL); pilot; pure-tone audiometry (PTA); signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33799421      PMCID: PMC7999744          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18062982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  36 in total

1.  Cochlear damage caused by continuous and intermittent noise exposure.

Authors:  Akram Pourbakht; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Judi A Lapsley Miller; Lynne Marshall; Laurie M Heller; Linda M Hughes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  A Job; M Raynal; M Kossowski; M Studler; C Ghernaouti; A Baffioni-Venturi; A Roux; C Darolles; A Guelorget
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tracy S Fitzgerald; Beth A Prieve
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Extended high-frequency audiometry (9,000-20,000 Hz). Usefulness in audiological diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Rodríguez Valiente; Amaya Roldán Fidalgo; Ithzel M Villarreal; José R García Berrocal
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2015-05-27

6.  Otoacoustic emissions in industrial hearing loss assessment.

Authors:  Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Piotr Kotylo
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

8.  From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.

Authors:  M P Gorga; S T Neely; B Ohlrich; B Hoover; J Redner; J Peters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Hearing health risk in a population of aircraft carrier flight deck personnel.

Authors:  Glen W Rovig; Bruce K Bohnker; John C Page
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Hearing threshold shifts among military pilots of the Israeli Air Force.

Authors:  Liyona Kampel-Furman; Z Joachims; H Bar-Cohen; A Grossman; Y Frenkel-Nir; Y Shapira; E Alon; E Carmon; B Gordon
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.