Literature DB >> 32182128

Evoked Potentials Reveal Noise Exposure-Related Central Auditory Changes Despite Normal Audiograms.

Naomi F Bramhall1,2, Christopher E Niemczak3, Sean D Kampel1, Curtis J Billings1,2, Garnett P McMillan1,4.   

Abstract

Purpose Complaints of auditory perceptual deficits, such as tinnitus and difficulty understanding speech in background noise, among individuals with clinically normal audiograms present a perplexing problem for audiologists. One potential explanation for these "hidden" auditory deficits is loss of the synaptic connections between the inner hair cells and their afferent auditory nerve fiber targets, a condition that has been termed cochlear synaptopathy. In animal models, cochlear synaptopathy can occur due to aging or exposure to noise or ototoxic drugs and is associated with reduced auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitudes. Decreased ABR wave I amplitudes have been demonstrated among young military Veterans and non-Veterans with a history of firearm use, suggesting that humans may also experience noise-induced synaptopathy. However, the downstream consequences of synaptopathy are unclear. Method To investigate how noise-induced reductions in wave I amplitude impact the central auditory system, the ABR, the middle latency response (MLR), and the late latency response (LLR) were measured in 65 young Veterans and non-Veterans with normal audiograms. Results In response to a click stimulus, the MLR was weaker for Veterans compared to non-Veterans, but the LLR was not reduced. In addition, low ABR wave I amplitudes were associated with a reduced MLR, but with an increased LLR. Notably, Veterans reporting tinnitus showed the largest mean LLRs. Conclusions These findings indicate that decreased peripheral auditory input leads to compensatory gain in the central auditory system, even among individuals with normal audiograms, and may impact auditory perception. This pattern of reduced MLR, but not LLR, was observed among Veterans even after statistical adjustment for sex and distortion product otoacoustic emission differences, suggesting that synaptic loss plays a role in the observed central gain. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11977854.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32182128      PMCID: PMC7839024          DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  51 in total

1.  Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille; Garnett McMillan; Susan Griest; Daniel McDermott; Stephen A Fausti; Donald F Austin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Translational issues in cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; Erik Larsen; Michael G Heinz; Leslie Shinobu; Jonathon P Whitton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

Authors:  R Näätänen; T Picton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A Large-Scale Examination of Veterans with Normal Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds within the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Lauren K Dillard; Zachary B Hoskins; Tina M Penman; Kelly M Reavis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Speech Perception Ability in Noise is Correlated with Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude.

Authors:  Naomi Bramhall; Bonnie Ong; Josephine Ko; Mark Parker
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Abdul-Latif Hamdan; Kim S Abouchacra; Adina G Zeki Al Hazzouri; Georges Zaytoun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Individual Differences in Auditory Brainstem Response Wave Characteristics: Relations to Different Aspects of Peripheral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Anoop Jagadeesh; Manfred Mauermann; Frauke Ernst
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 10.  Inner Hair Cell Loss Disrupts Hearing and Cochlear Function Leading to Sensory Deprivation and Enhanced Central Auditory Gain.

Authors:  Richard Salvi; Wei Sun; Dalian Ding; Guang-Di Chen; Edward Lobarinas; Jian Wang; Kelly Radziwon; Benjamin D Auerbach
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Longitudinal auditory pathophysiology following mild blast-induced trauma.

Authors:  Emily X Han; Joseph M Fernandez; Caitlin Swanberg; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and its Prevention: Current Issues in Mammalian Hearing.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-07-12

Review 4.  Review: Neural Mechanisms of Tinnitus and Hyperacusis in Acute Drug-Induced Ototoxicity.

Authors:  Richard Salvi; Kelly Radziwon; Senthilvelan Manohar; Ben Auerbach; Dalian Ding; Xiaopeng Liu; Condon Lau; Yu-Chen Chen; Guang-Di Chen
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss in mice by in vivo Htra2 gene editing.

Authors:  Xi Gu; Daqi Wang; Zhijiao Xu; Yilai Shu; Huawei Li; Jinghan Wang; Luo Guo; Renjie Chai; Genglin Li
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Gene editing in a Myo6 semi-dominant mouse model rescues auditory function.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Xue; Xinde Hu; Daqi Wang; Di Li; Yige Li; Fang Wang; Mingqian Huang; Xi Gu; Zhijiao Xu; Jinan Zhou; Jinghan Wang; Renjie Chai; Jun Shen; Zheng-Yi Chen; Geng-Lin Li; Hui Yang; Huawei Li; Erwei Zuo; Yilai Shu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 11.454

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.