Literature DB >> 33831576

Osteoinductivity and biomechanical assessment of a 3D printed demineralized bone matrix-ceramic composite in a rat spine fusion model.

Mark A Plantz1, Silvia Minardi1, Joseph G Lyons1, Allison C Greene1, David J Ellenbogen1, Mitchell Hallman1, Jonathan T Yamaguchi1, Soyeon Jeong1, Chawon Yun1, Adam E Jakus2, Kenneth R Blank3, Robert M Havey4, Muturi Muriuki3, Avinash G Patwardhan4, Ramille N Shah5, Wellington K Hsu1, Stuart R Stock6, Erin L Hsu7.   

Abstract

We recently developed a recombinant growth factor-free bone regenerative scaffold composed of stoichiometric hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic particles and human demineralized bone matrix (DBM) particles (HA-DBM). Here, we performed the first pre-clinical comparative evaluation of HA-DBM relative to the industry standard and established positive control, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), using a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model (PLF). Female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent bilateral L4-L5 PLF with implantation of the HA-DBM scaffold or rhBMP-2. Fusion was evaluated using radiography and blinded manual palpation, while biomechanical testing quantified the segmental flexion-extension range-of-motion (ROM) and stiffness of the fused segments at 8-weeks postoperatively. For mechanistic studies, pro-osteogenic gene and protein expression at 2-days and 1-, 2-, and 8-weeks postoperatively was assessed with another cohort. Unilateral fusion rates did not differ between the HA-DBM (93%) and rhBMP-2 (100%) groups; however, fusion scores were higher with rhBMP-2 (p = 0.008). Both treatments resulted in significantly reduced segmental ROM (p < 0.001) and greater stiffness (p = 0.009) when compared with non-operated controls; however, the degree of stabilization was significantly higher with rhBMP-2 treatment relative to the HA-DBM scaffold. In the mechanistic studies, PLGA and HA scaffolds were used as negative controls. Both rhBMP-2 and HA-DBM treatments resulted in significant elevations of several osteogenesis-associated genes, including Runx2, Osx, and Alp. The rhBMP-2 treatment led to significantly greater early, mid, and late osteogenic markers, which may be the mechanism in which early clinical complications are seen. The HA-DBM scaffold also induced osteogenic gene expression, but primarily at the 2-week postoperative timepoint. Overall, our findings show promise for this 3D-printed composite as a recombinant growth factor-free bone graft substitute for spinal fusion. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Despite current developments in bone graft technology, there remains a significant void in adequate materials for bone regeneration in clinical applications. Two of the most efficacious bone graft options are the gold-standard iliac crest bone graft and recombinant human-derived bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), available commercially as Infuse™. Although efficacious, autologous graft is associated with donor-site morbidity, and Infuse™ has known side effects related to its substantial host inflammatory response, possibly associated with a immediate, robust osteoinductive response. Hence, there is a need for a bone graft substitute that provides adequate osteogenesis without associated adverse events. This study represents a significant step in the design of off-the-shelf growth factor-free devices for spine fusion.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Bone regeneration; Demineralized bone matrix; Hydroxyapatite; Spine fusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33831576      PMCID: PMC8154748          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   10.633


  39 in total

Review 1.  Synthesis and application of nanostructured calcium phosphate ceramics for bone regeneration.

Authors:  D Alves Cardoso; J A Jansen; S C G Leeuwenburgh
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  Gel scaffolds of BMP-2-binding peptide amphiphile nanofibers for spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  Sungsoo S Lee; Erin L Hsu; Marco Mendoza; Jason Ghodasra; Michael S Nickoli; Amruta Ashtekar; Mahesh Polavarapu; Jacob Babu; Rehan M Riaz; Joseph D Nicolas; David Nelson; Sohaib Z Hashmi; Start R Kaltz; Jeffrey S Earhart; Bradley R Merk; Jeff S McKee; Shawn F Bairstow; Ramille N Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Role and regulation of RUNX2 in osteogenesis.

Authors:  M Bruderer; R G Richards; M Alini; M J Stoddart
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Two distinct osteoblast-specific cis-acting elements control expression of a mouse osteocalcin gene.

Authors:  P Ducy; G Karsenty
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Nanocomposite therapy as a more efficacious and less inflammatory alternative to bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a rodent arthrodesis model.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; Mahesh Polavarapu; Rehan Riaz; Gilbert C Roc; Stuart R Stock; Zachary S Glicksman; Jason H Ghodasra; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Dioxin Exposure Impairs BMP-2-Mediated Spinal Fusion in a Rat Arthrodesis Model.

Authors:  Erin L Hsu; Kevin Sonn; Abhishek Kannan; Sharath Bellary; Chawon Yun; Sohaib Hashmi; John Nelson; Marco Mendoza; Michael Nickoli; Jason Ghodasra; Christian Park; Sean Mitchell; Amruta Ashtekar; Anjan Ghosh; Akshay Jain; Stuart R Stock; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Stem cells from human fat as cellular delivery vehicles in an athymic rat posterolateral spine fusion model.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; Jeffrey C Wang; Nancy Q Liu; Lucie Krenek; Patricia A Zuk; Marc H Hedrick; Prosper Benhaim; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing.

Authors:  Timothy T Roberts; Andrew J Rosenbaum
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Erin L Hsu; Jason H Ghodasra; Amruta Ashtekar; Michael S Nickoli; Sungsoo S Lee; Samuel I Stupp; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management.

Authors:  Gabriel Fernandez de Grado; Laetitia Keller; Ysia Idoux-Gillet; Quentin Wagner; Anne-Marie Musset; Nadia Benkirane-Jessel; Fabien Bornert; Damien Offner
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.813

View more
  2 in total

1.  Enhanced bone regenerative properties of calcium phosphate ceramic granules in rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion through a reduction of grain size.

Authors:  Xiangfeng Li; Quan Zhou; Yonghao Wu; Cong Feng; Xi Yang; Linnan Wang; Yumei Xiao; Kai Zhang; Xiangdong Zhu; Limin Liu; Yueming Song; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-10-08

2.  Application of Image-Fusion 3D Printing Model in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Malignant Tumors.

Authors:  Yushan Wang; Yi Xiang; Qiaoqiao Tian; Wei Luo; Hao Fan; Peng Ren; Zhi Lv; Jia Lv; Junjun Bai; Xiaochen Qiao; Yi Feng
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.822

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.