Literature DB >> 34314238

Speech Understanding in Modulated Noise and Speech Maskers as a Function of Cognitive Status in Older Adults.

Sara K Mamo1, Karen S Helfer1.   

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different types of maskers on speech understanding as a function of cognitive status in older adults. The hypothesis tested was that individuals with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia would perform like their age- and hearing status-matched control counterparts in modulated noise but would perform more poorly in the presence of competing speech. Design Participants (n = 39; age range: 55-77 years old) performed a speech-in-noise task and completed two cognitive screening tests and a measure of working memory. Sentences were presented in the presence of two types of maskers (i.e., speech envelope-modulated noise and two-talker, same-sex competing speech). Two analyses were undertaken: (a) a between-groups comparison of individuals diagnosed with MCI/dementia, individuals who failed both cognitive screeners (possible MCI), and age- and hearing status-matched neurologically healthy control individuals and (b) a mixed-model analysis of variance of speech perception performance as a function of working memory capacity. Results The between-groups comparison yielded significant group differences for speech understanding in both masking conditions, with the MCI/dementia group performing more poorly than the neurologically healthy controls and possible MCI groups. A single measure of working memory (Size Comparison Span [SICSPAN]) was correlated with performance on the speech perception task in the competing speech conditions. Conclusions Adults with a diagnosis of MCI or mild dementia performed more poorly on a speech perception task than their age- and hearing status-matched control counterparts in the presence of both maskers, with larger group mean differences when the target speech was presented in a two-talker masker. This suggests increased difficulty understanding speech in the presence of distracting backgrounds for people with MCI/dementia. Future studies should consider how to target this potentially vulnerable population as they may be experiencing increased difficulty communicating in challenging environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34314238      PMCID: PMC8642080          DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.636


  53 in total

Review 1.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon; Erica J Williams
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Psychometric equivalence of a paper-based and computerized (iPad) version of the Memory Orientation Screening Test (MOST®).

Authors:  Mitchell Clionsky; Emily Clionsky
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 5.  Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Central auditory function in early Alzheimer's disease and in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Esma Idrizbegovic; Christina Hederstierna; Martin Dahlquist; Charlotta Kämpfe Nordström; Vesna Jelic; Ulf Rosenhall
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner; Adriana Zekveld; Patrik Sörqvist; Henrik Danielsson; Björn Lyxell; Orjan Dahlström; Carine Signoret; Stefan Stenfelt; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-13

10.  On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.