| Literature DB >> 27906100 |
Ole Lagatie1, Michelle Merino2, Linda Batsa Debrah3, Alexander Y Debrah4, Lieven J Stuyver2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic procedures for the diagnosis of infection with the nematode parasite Onchocerca volvulus are currently based on the microscopic detection of microfilariae in skin biopsies. Alternative approaches based on amplification of parasitic DNA in these skin biopsies are currently being explored. Mostly this is based on the detection of the O-150 repeat sequence using PCR based techniques.Entities:
Keywords: DNA; Diagnostic; Isothermal; LAMP; Onchocerca volvulus; Onchocerciasis; River blindness; Skin biopsy; cox1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27906100 PMCID: PMC5134125 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1913-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Characteristics of study populations used in this study
| Characteristic | Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Nodule-positive | Endemic controls | |
| No. of subjects | 99 | 51 |
| Age, median (min-max) | 47 (21–85) | 35 (18–81) |
| Gender, | ||
| Male | 53 (54) | 26 (51) |
| Female | 46 (46) | 25 (49) |
| No. of nodules, median (min-max) | 1 (1–5) | 0 |
| mf status, | ||
| 0 mf/mg | 89 (90) | 51 (100) |
| 0–5 mf/mg | 9 (9) | 0 (0) |
| 5–10 mf/mg | 1 (1) | 0 (0) |
| No. of IVM rounds, median (min-max) | 2 (0–10) | 0 (0–1) |
| Time since last treatment | ||
| Not treated | 16 (16) | 34 (67) |
| < 20 months | 68 (69) | 5 (10) |
| > 20 months | 15 (15) | 12 (24) |
| Ov16 status, | ||
| Positive | 68 (69) | 26 (51) |
| Negative | 31 (31) | 25 (49) |
Abbreviations: mf microfilaria, Ov16 O. volvulus antigen with molecular weight of 16 kDa
Fig. 1Design of a LAMP assay targeting O. volvulus cox1. a Alignment of partial gene sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from O. volvulus, W. bancrofti, L. loa, B. malayi and O. ochengi. b Primer set targeting O. volvulus cox1. c Species-specific LAMP assay targeting O. volvulus cox1. c Dilution series of gBlocks containing the cox1 fragment of O. volvulus, W. bancrofti, L. loa and B. malayi were used as template in the LAMP assay using real-time fluorescent dye detection. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. Dilution indicated with an asterisk had detectable signal in only one of both duplicates
Fig. 2O. volvulus cox1 assay discriminates between O. volvulus and O. ochengi. a Dilution series of gBlocks containing the cox1 fragment of O. volvulus and O. ochengi were used as template in the O. volvulus cox1 LAMP assay using real-time fluorescent dye detection. b Melting point determination of the amplicons generated from different dilutions of O. volvulus and O. ochengi template. c Melting curves of the amplicons generated from O. volvulus and O. ochengi template
Fig. 3Comparison of results obtained by LAMP, O-150 qPCR and microscopic detection of microfilariae in skin snips. Comparison of results obtained by O. volvulus cox1 LAMP and O-150 qPCR for 146 subjects. Samples that were positive in microscopic examination are indicated in blue (n = 9). For each quadrant the total number of samples is indicated, as well as the number of microscopy positive samples in parentheses
Cross tabulation of results obtained by qPCR, LAMP, microscopic detection of micro-filariae (mf) in skin snips, and nodule palpation for 146 individuals in the Adansi South District, Ghana
| Nodule-positive | Nodule-negative | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mf-positive | mf-negative | mf-positive | mf-negative | Totals | |
| qPCR-positive | 8 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 17 |
| qPCR-negative | 1 | 81 | 0 | 47 | 129 |
| LAMP-positive | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 16 |
| LAMP-negative | 1 | 82 | 0 | 47 | 130 |
| Totals | 9 | 86 | 0 | 51 | 146 |
Abbreviation: mf microfilariae
Determination of sensitivity and specificity of LAMP as compared to qPCR
| qPCR-positive | qPCR-negative | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LAMP-positive | 15 | 1 | PPV 93.8% |
| LAMP-negative | 2 | 128 | NPV 98.5% |
| Sensitivity: 88.2% | Specificity: 99.2% |