Literature DB >> 27906100

An isothermal DNA amplification method for detection of Onchocerca volvulus infection in skin biopsies.

Ole Lagatie1, Michelle Merino2, Linda Batsa Debrah3, Alexander Y Debrah4, Lieven J Stuyver2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic procedures for the diagnosis of infection with the nematode parasite Onchocerca volvulus are currently based on the microscopic detection of microfilariae in skin biopsies. Alternative approaches based on amplification of parasitic DNA in these skin biopsies are currently being explored. Mostly this is based on the detection of the O-150 repeat sequence using PCR based techniques.
METHODS: An isothermal, loop-mediated amplification method has been designed using the mitochondrial O. volvulus cox1 gene as a target.
RESULTS: Analysis of dilution series of synthetic DNA containing the targeted sequence show a non-linear dose-response curve, as is usually the case for isothermal amplification methods. Evaluation of cross-reactivity with the heterologous sequence from the closely related parasites Wuchereria bancrofti, Loa loa and Brugia malayi demonstrated strong specificity, as none of these sequences was amplified. The assay however amplified both O. volvulus and O. ochengi DNA, but with a different melting point that can be used to discriminate between the species. Evaluation of this assay in a set of skin snip biopsies collected in an endemic area in Ghana showed a high correlation with O-150 qPCR and also demonstrated a similar sensitivity. Compared to qPCR, LAMP had a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 99.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a sensitive and specific loop-mediated amplification method for detection of O. volvulus DNA in skin biopsies that is capable of providing results within 30 min.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA; Diagnostic; Isothermal; LAMP; Onchocerca volvulus; Onchocerciasis; River blindness; Skin biopsy; cox1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27906100      PMCID: PMC5134125          DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1913-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


Background

Onchocerciasis, infection with the filarial nematode Onchocerca volvulus is a neglected tropical disease which is best known as river blindness [1, 2]. In Africa at least 120 million people are at risk of infection. The last comprehensive survey conducted in 2008 indicated that 26 million people were infected with O. volvulus, of which 265,000 individuals were blind and 746,000 were visually impaired. In addition, approximately four million people suffer from onchodermatitis with severe itching [3]. Presently, treatment is based on microfilaricidal agents, such as ivermectin (Mectizan, Merck), as no approved macrofilaricide drugs or vaccines are available. Since microfilaricides only affect the larval stage of O. volvulus with little or no impact on the adult worm, annual or bi-annual treatments for several years are required [4, 5]. Since the start of these mass drug administration programs (MDA) in 1987, ivermectin has been used to treat hundreds of millions of people with a resultant reduction in both visual impairment and symptomatic onchodermatitis [6]. Evaluation of MDA programs, and ultimately also guidance to stop them, is based mainly on monitoring of infection levels in human populations, as well as in its vector, the blackfly of the genus Simulium. Besides clinical examination by palpation of nodules formed by adult worms (macrofilariae), diagnostic tools for detection of O. volvulus infection involves finding microfilariae (mf) in small, superficial skin biopsy samples (skin snips) using microscopy [7]. The latter can be a challenge, especially when larval densities are low, which is often the case during or the first months after treatment with ivermectin. The sensitivity of this test has been further increased by using polymerase chain reaction based detection of the Onchocerca specific O-150 repeat sequence [8-11]. Several efforts have been undertaken to identify novel biomarkers that offer a less-invasive, specific and sensitive marker for infection with O. volvulus [12]. The most advanced of these tests, is the rapid-format test for the detection of IgG4 antibodies to the parasitic antigen Ov-16, which is predominantly useful in a surveillance setting [13-18]. Another approach that has shown promise is the use of metabolome analysis of serum or urine samples from infected individuals, which has led to the identification of urinary N-acetyltyramine-O,β-glucuronide (NATOG) as a unique biomarker for O. volvulus infection [19-21]. More recent work has focused on the detection of parasitic microRNAs in the blood of infected individuals, but the low levels of these biomarkers may pose a real challenge to be useful as a diagnostic marker [22-24]. Isothermal amplification provides a simple process that rapidly and efficiently accumulates nucleic acids at constant temperature [25]. In contrast to PCR-based amplification, no temperature cycles are required, which facilitates its integration into microsystems or portable devices. One of the most frequently used isothermal amplification technologies is the loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), which is based on two primer sets that recognized six different sites on the target DNA and an optional third set of primers, so-called loop primers to accelerate the reaction [26, 27]. LAMP offers advantages over other molecular diagnostic methods because it is simple, rapid and highly specific. This technology has been evaluated for the diagnosis of the filarial parasites Brugia malayi [28], Wuchereria bancrofti [29] and Loa loa [30-32]. Also for Onchocerca volvulus, a LAMP assay has been developed for surveillance of parasite transmission in the blackfly [33]. In the present study, we report the design of a LAMP assay that targets the mitochondrial encoded O. volvulus cox1 gene. This work provides evidence of the high sensitivity of this assay, and the close concordance with qPCR based detection of O. volvulus DNA.

Methods

Study samples

Skin biopsy samples were collected as part of a field study in Ghana. This study was undertaken in an Onchocerciasis-endemic community located in Adansi South District along the Pra River basins in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Physical examinations were performed to identify those subjects having palpable nodules. Most subjects were participating in MDA programs with ivermectin. An overview of the patient demographics is provided in Table 1. From each participant two skin biopsies were taken, one from the right and one from the left hip. Immediately after sampling, biopsies were transferred individually into a single round bottom well of a 96-well plate, submerged in saline solution and after overnight incubation at room temperature each biopsy was examined microscopically and the emerged microfilariae of O. volvulus counted. [34]. Thereafter the two biopsies collected from each participant were weighed and transferred individually to microcentrifuge tubes and stored in liquid nitrogen.
Table 1

Characteristics of study populations used in this study

CharacteristicGroup
Nodule-positiveEndemic controls
No. of subjects9951
Age, median (min-max)47 (21–85)35 (18–81)
Gender, n (%)
 Male53 (54)26 (51)
 Female46 (46)25 (49)
No. of nodules, median (min-max)1 (1–5)0
mf status, n (%)
 0 mf/mg89 (90)51 (100)
 0–5 mf/mg9 (9)0 (0)
 5–10 mf/mg1 (1)0 (0)
No. of IVM rounds, median (min-max)2 (0–10)0 (0–1)
Time since last treatment
 Not treated16 (16)34 (67)
  < 20 months68 (69)5 (10)
  > 20 months15 (15)12 (24)
Ov16 status, n (%)
 Positive68 (69)26 (51)
 Negative31 (31)25 (49)

Abbreviations: mf microfilaria, Ov16 O. volvulus antigen with molecular weight of 16 kDa

Characteristics of study populations used in this study Abbreviations: mf microfilaria, Ov16 O. volvulus antigen with molecular weight of 16 kDa

Extraction of genomic DNA from skin biopsies

Genomic DNA was extracted from each skin biopsy using the OMEGA E.Z.N.A. tissue DNA kit (Norcross, GA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was eluted in 200 μl elution buffer. The quantity and quality of extracted DNA was assessed with a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ND-1000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and DNA was stored at -20 °C before analysis [34]. Extracted DNA concentrations ranged from 0.2 ng/μl to 134 ng/μl. Extracts were diluted in nuclease free water to a concentration of 10 ng/μl, except for those samples which already had a lower concentration, which were used undiluted. In order to confirm that DNA in the extracts was intact and could be amplified, qPCR targeting the human beta-actin gene was performed on 10 ng of template DNA. This was done using the PrimeTime actb qPCR assay, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Integrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium). The primers and probe included in the assay were Fwd Primer 5'-CAC GGC TAG CTG TG-3', Rev Primer 5'-ATC GTT CGT TGA GCG ATT AGC AG-3', Probe 5'-6-FAM-GTG GCT CCA TCT TAG CCC TAG T-IBFQ-3' (Iowa Black® FQ), with internal quencher ZEN. Four of the 150 extracts (including 1 mf positive sample) were excluded for further analysis as they did not meet the acceptance criteria described in the statistical analysis below (see Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Quantitative real-time PCR assay for detecting O-150 DNA

A TaqMan qPCR assay based on a previously published method (see [35]) was used to quantify O. volvulus O-150 DNA. The primers and probe included OvFWD 5'-TGT GGA AAT TCA CCT AAA TAT G-3', OvREV 5'-AAT AAC TGA TGA CCT ATG ACC-3', OvProbe 5'-6-FAM-TAG GAC CCA ATT CGA ATG TAT GTA CCC-IBFQ-3' (Iowa Black® FQ), with internal quencher ZEN (Integrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium). Taqman Universal Master Mix without UNG (Applied Biosystems, P/N 4440040) and nuclease free water were used with all reactions with the following concentrations and volumes: 1 μl of 10 μM OvFWD, 1 μl of 10 μM OvREV, 2.5 μl of 10 μM OvProbe, 10 μl of 2× Master Mix, 5 μl of template DNA from extracted skin biopsies, or 2 μl of linearized Ov-150 positive control plasmid at a concentration of 100 to 106 copies/μl (Integrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium), and nuclease-free water was added up to a final volume of 20 μl. Reactions were performed in duplicate on a Roche Lightcycler 480 instrument with the following conditions: 95 °C 10 min (95 °C 15 s, 49 °C 15 s, 60 °C 30 s) × 45 cycles. The second derivate method was used to calculate Cq values and samples were considered positive for Ov-150 DNA if Cq (quantification cycle) values were greater than 36.15 (corresponding to 2 log copies/reaction) in both duplicates. The calibration curve (0.3 to 6.3 log copies/reaction) of the O-150 qPCR assay is given by the formula y = -3.57x + 43.29 (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification primer design

The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of O. volvulus (NC_001861.1) was retrieved from the NCBI database. LAMP primers targeting O. volvulus mitochondrial DNA were designed using LAMP Designer V1.13 (OptiGene, Horsham, UK). Two sets of primers comprising two outer (F3 and B3), and two inner (FIP and BIP) were selected. FIP contained F1c (complementary to F1), and the F2 sequence. BIP contained the B1c sequence (complementary to B1) and the B2 sequence. Additional loop primers, forward loop primer (LoopF) and backward loop primer (LoopB) were included in the reaction. BLAST analysis [36] of the fragment located between the two outer primers indicated the target gene was cox1.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay

LAMP reactions were performed using the primers designed as described above. LAMP reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μl. Reaction mixtures contained 12 μl Isothermal Mastermix (OptiGene, Horsham, UK), 0.5 μl of each F3 and B3 primer (10 μM), 2 μl of each FIP and BIP primer (20 μM), 1 μl of each LoopF and LoopB (10 μM), 5 μl of template DNA from extracted skin biopsies, or 5 μl of specific gBlocks (O. volvulus cox1, O. ochengi cox1, W. bancrofti cox1, L. loa cox1 or B. malayi cox1) at a concentration of 100 to 106 copies/μl (Integrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium), and nuclease-free water was added up to a final volume of 25 μl. The mixture was incubated at 65 °C for 45 min, with fluorescent detection every 30 s on a Roche Lightcycler 480 instrument. At the end of the incubation period, T m determination was performed by increasing the temperature to 95 °C with 5 fluorescence acquisitions per °C. The threshold method, using an arbitrarily selected threshold of 10 RFU, was used to calculate Ct values. Time to LAMP was calculated by dividing the obtained Ct values by 2 (one cycle corresponds to 30 s). The detection limit of LAMP was determined to be 2 log copies/reaction as at this concentration a positive signal was reproducibly obtained in the assay. Based on the calibration curves obtained with the synthetic DNA and the higher variation observed in Time to LAMP at low concentrations (2 log copies/reaction), a cut-off of 30 min was defined. Samples were considered positive if average Time to LAMP < 30 min.

Statistical analysis

Results of human Actin qPCR were subjected to statistical analysis in order to identify samples with poor extraction and/or qPCR efficiency. Average Cq value and standard deviation of all samples was calculated and possible outliers were identified as samples with Cq value > average + 2 standard deviations, SD. In case outliers were detected, samples were not included for further analysis. For comparison of T m values in different groups, a two-tailed unpaired t-test with 95% confidence interval was performed. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be significantly different. Correlation between different parameters was analyzed using linear regression. P-values were calculated to determine whether slope was significantly non-zero and the strength of correlation was determined using R 2-value. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.02.

Results

A primer set targeting O. volvulus cox1 was designed using LAMP Designer software (Fig. 1a, b). LAMP assays were performed on a dilution series of synthetic DNA containing the target sequence. Since there is a close sequence homology with other helminth parasites (Fig. 1a), assays were also performed on dilution series of synthetic DNA containing the heterologous sequence from Wuchereria bancrofti, Loa loa and Brugia malayi in order to determine the specificity of the primer set (Fig. 1c). The region heterologous to the O. volvulus region targeted by the assay (i.e. from F3 to B3 primer) was 87.0, 86.7 and 86.2% identical to sequences from W. bancrofti, L. loa and B. malayi, respectively. When the O. volvulus target sequence was used as a template, a clear amplification was observed, with concentration-dependent time to reach threshold fluorescence signal, whereas no amplification was observed within the time interval examined (45 min) when the same amount of heterologous DNA from W. bancrofti, L. loa or B. malayi was used.
Fig. 1

Design of a LAMP assay targeting O. volvulus cox1. a Alignment of partial gene sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from O. volvulus, W. bancrofti, L. loa, B. malayi and O. ochengi. b Primer set targeting O. volvulus cox1. c Species-specific LAMP assay targeting O. volvulus cox1. c Dilution series of gBlocks containing the cox1 fragment of O. volvulus, W. bancrofti, L. loa and B. malayi were used as template in the LAMP assay using real-time fluorescent dye detection. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. Dilution indicated with an asterisk had detectable signal in only one of both duplicates

Design of a LAMP assay targeting O. volvulus cox1. a Alignment of partial gene sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from O. volvulus, W. bancrofti, L. loa, B. malayi and O. ochengi. b Primer set targeting O. volvulus cox1. c Species-specific LAMP assay targeting O. volvulus cox1. c Dilution series of gBlocks containing the cox1 fragment of O. volvulus, W. bancrofti, L. loa and B. malayi were used as template in the LAMP assay using real-time fluorescent dye detection. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. Dilution indicated with an asterisk had detectable signal in only one of both duplicates Specificity of the assay was further investigated by examining the potential of the primer set to amplify the heterologous region of O. ochengi. Similarity between the O. volvulus cox1 and O. ochengi cox1 is very high, with only 10 nucleotide differences (i.e. 97.5% identity) over the entire sequence targeted by the assay (Fig. 1a). Consequently, both synthetic DNA fragments containing the respective target sequences are amplified with a similar efficiency and a same time to LAMP as a result (Fig. 2a). The few nucleotides difference does however result in a statistically different melting point (T m). Mean melt temperatures of 84.14 ± 0.03 and 83.73 ± 0.03 °C for O. volvulus cox1 and O. ochengi cox1, respectively (t (18) = 22.56, P < 0.0001, Fig. 2b), were determined across 10 reactions. Melting curves obtained on both DNA fragments were largely overlapping (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2

O. volvulus cox1 assay discriminates between O. volvulus and O. ochengi. a Dilution series of gBlocks containing the cox1 fragment of O. volvulus and O. ochengi were used as template in the O. volvulus cox1 LAMP assay using real-time fluorescent dye detection. b Melting point determination of the amplicons generated from different dilutions of O. volvulus and O. ochengi template. c Melting curves of the amplicons generated from O. volvulus and O. ochengi template

O. volvulus cox1 assay discriminates between O. volvulus and O. ochengi. a Dilution series of gBlocks containing the cox1 fragment of O. volvulus and O. ochengi were used as template in the O. volvulus cox1 LAMP assay using real-time fluorescent dye detection. b Melting point determination of the amplicons generated from different dilutions of O. volvulus and O. ochengi template. c Melting curves of the amplicons generated from O. volvulus and O. ochengi template To demonstrate the applicability of the O. volvulus cox1 LAMP assay to determine active O. volvulus infection in individuals living in endemic areas, skin biopsy samples were collected in the Ashanti Region, an onchocerciasis endemic region in Ghana. A total of 150 individuals, of which 99 had obvious nodules and 51 had no signs of onchocerciasis, were included in this study. Of the 99 nodule-positive individuals, only 10 were found to contain microfilariae upon microscopic examination. Total genomic DNA was isolated from these samples. From the 150 gDNA samples, 4 were excluded as they did not meet the acceptance criteria (see Methods). The 146 analysed extracts were tested for the presence of O. volvulus DNA using both qPCR and LAMP (Fig. 3a and Table 2). While only 9 individuals were found to be test-positive by microscopy, 17 were positive by qPCR and 15 by LAMP. This observation confirms the superior sensitivity of molecular detection over microscopic examination. These data also indicate a sensitivity of LAMP of 88.2% compared to qPCR (Table 3). The 2 samples negative in LAMP but positive in qPCR had Cq values of 35 and above, indicating they contained extremely low amounts of O. volvulus DNA. One sample that was found to be negative in qPCR was positive in LAMP, corresponding to a specificity of 99.2% as compared to qPCR. Also, a clear correlation could be observed between Cq values obtained during qPCR and the Time to LAMP obtained in the LAMP assay (R 2 = 0.555, P < 0.001).
Fig. 3

Comparison of results obtained by LAMP, O-150 qPCR and microscopic detection of microfilariae in skin snips. Comparison of results obtained by O. volvulus cox1 LAMP and O-150 qPCR for 146 subjects. Samples that were positive in microscopic examination are indicated in blue (n = 9). For each quadrant the total number of samples is indicated, as well as the number of microscopy positive samples in parentheses

Table 2

Cross tabulation of results obtained by qPCR, LAMP, microscopic detection of micro-filariae (mf) in skin snips, and nodule palpation for 146 individuals in the Adansi South District, Ghana

Nodule-positiveNodule-negative
mf-positivemf-negativemf-positivemf-negativeTotals
qPCR-positive850417
qPCR-negative181047129
LAMP-positive840416
LAMP-negative182047130
Totals986051146

Abbreviation: mf microfilariae

Table 3

Determination of sensitivity and specificity of LAMP as compared to qPCR

qPCR-positiveqPCR-negative
LAMP-positive151PPV 93.8%
LAMP-negative2128NPV 98.5%
Sensitivity: 88.2%Specificity: 99.2%
Comparison of results obtained by LAMP, O-150 qPCR and microscopic detection of microfilariae in skin snips. Comparison of results obtained by O. volvulus cox1 LAMP and O-150 qPCR for 146 subjects. Samples that were positive in microscopic examination are indicated in blue (n = 9). For each quadrant the total number of samples is indicated, as well as the number of microscopy positive samples in parentheses Cross tabulation of results obtained by qPCR, LAMP, microscopic detection of micro-filariae (mf) in skin snips, and nodule palpation for 146 individuals in the Adansi South District, Ghana Abbreviation: mf microfilariae Determination of sensitivity and specificity of LAMP as compared to qPCR

Discussion

This work reports the development of a LAMP method for detection of O. volvulus DNA and its use in field collected skin biopsies from an onchocerciasis endemic region in Ghana. Currently, diagnosis of infection with O. volvulus is predominantly based on nodule palpation and microscopic detection of microfilariae in superficial skin biopsies [12]. The latter test is particularly useful for detection of active infection, but consequently suffers from insufficient sensitivity in an MDA era where the load of living microfilariae in the skin is dramatically reduced [37, 38]. Previous studies already demonstrated that the detection of O. volvulus DNA using PCR in such skin biopsies has a higher sensitivity than the classical microscopy approach [8]. Sensitivity was further improved by development of a probe-based qPCR assay [11]. qPCR also has the advantage that it is relatively fast and is less prone to contamination. Results presented here demonstrate that similar sensitivities can be achieved with the O. volvulus cox1 LAMP assay. Only those samples containing very low levels of O. volvulus DNA (Cq values in qPCR > 35) were found to have a negative result in LAMP. Importantly, samples that were found to be positive upon microscopic examination were confirmed to be positive using qPCR and LAMP in eight out of nine cases. Although the O-150 qPCR assay has the advantage of targeting a repeat sequence that is present multiple times in the O. volvulus genome, the cox1 LAMP assay has a comparable clinical sensitivity of 88.2%. A likely explanation for this high sensitivity is the fact that the cox1 gene is located in the mitochondrial genome, while O-150 is located in the nuclear genome [39, 40]. Since every cell contains hundreds of mitochondrial DNA copies, it makes mitochondrial encoded sequences ideal targets for molecular detection requiring high sensitivity, as is the case for O. volvulus detection in skin biopsies [41]. For this reason, the cox1 gene has already been used as a target for other molecular assays to detect the presence of the jellyfish Cyanea nozakii in seawater samples or the presence of the olive tree pest Bactrocera oleae in the guts of arthropods [42, 43]. It will be of interest for future work to study whether a correlation exists between number of mf as determined by microscopy and time to LAMP. Sample collections from infected, but untreated patients will be essential for this as these samples should display a broader range of microfilaremia required to properly assess such correlation. The LAMP assay presented here is also shown to be highly specific for Onchocerca species as no amplification could be observed when the heterologous DNA from W. bancrofti, L. loa and B. malayi were used as template in the reaction. However, the assay also detects O. ochengi, but with a slight difference in T m of the amplicons produced. As there is a large overlap in the melting curves obtained for both species, T m determination will be able to distinguish both species in case samples contain only DNA from one of both species but not in cases were both are present in one and the same sample. This cross-reactivity with O. ochengi DNA is not expected to pose an issue when used to analyze skin biopsies from humans as this species is typically present in cattle and not in humans [44]. As a consequence of this cross-reactivity this assay might not be ideally suited for specific detection of O. volvulus in Simulium blackfly vectors where it may be used to assess changes in parasite prevalence during or after MDA programs [45-49]. The main advantages of isothermal amplification methods, such as LAMP, over PCR-based detection techniques, are the speed with which the assays can be completed, and the simple and relatively inexpensive equipment required [26, 50]. The O. volvulus cox1 LAMP assay we developed here reaches threshold fluorescence after just 10 min in cases of high target concentration and can take up to 30 min for low concentration samples. This characteristic, together with the availability of inexpensive reagents and the possibility to use a portable real time machine for monitoring the LAMP amplification, is of great importance for its use for point of care nucleic acid based diagnosis [51]. One major challenge of the analysis of O. volvulus DNA skin biopsies remains its invasive nature and the requirement of extraction techniques to isolate the parasitic DNA from this tissue sample [12]. Several efforts have been undertaken to evaluate simple extraction methods that are compatible with LAMP, of which boiling in 5% Chelex buffer or in NaOH appear to be the most promising approaches [52, 53]. Interestingly, extraction and LAMP detection have been integrated in single devices for detection of e.g. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples [54]. Whether isolation of O. volvulus DNA from skin biopsies also can be achieved with high efficiency using similar extraction methods, will need to be further investigated.

Conclusions

We have developed a sensitive and specific loop-mediated amplification method for detection of O. volvulus DNA in skin biopsies that is capable of providing results within 30 min.
  52 in total

1.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA.

Authors:  T Notomi; H Okayama; H Masubuchi; T Yonekawa; K Watanabe; N Amino; T Hase
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for detecting Wuchereria bancrofti DNA in human blood and vector mosquitoes.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takagi; Makoto Itoh; Shinji Kasai; Thishan C Yahathugoda; Mirani V Weerasooriya; Eisaku Kimura
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 3.  Isothermal Amplification of Nucleic Acids.

Authors:  Yongxi Zhao; Feng Chen; Qian Li; Lihua Wang; Chunhai Fan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects.

Authors:  Tsugunori Notomi; Yasuyoshi Mori; Norihiro Tomita; Hidetoshi Kanda
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 3.422

5.  Large-scale entomologic assessment of Onchocerca volvulus transmission by poolscreen PCR in Mexico.

Authors:  Mario A Rodríguez-Pérez; Charles R Katholi; Hassan K Hassan; Thomas R Unnasch
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Onchocerca volvulus-neurotransmitter tyramine is a biomarker for river blindness.

Authors:  Daniel Globisch; Amira Y Moreno; Mark S Hixon; Ashlee A K Nunes; Judith R Denery; Sabine Specht; Achim Hoerauf; Kim D Janda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A simple dot blot assay adaptable for field use in the diagnosis of onchocerciasis: preparation of an adult worm antigen fraction which enhances sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  C Lavebratt; G Dalhammar; N A Adamafio; U Nykänen-Dejerud; K Mingarini; K Ingemarsson; N Opoku; H O Akuffo
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.184

8.  Metabolomics-based discovery of diagnostic biomarkers for onchocerciasis.

Authors:  Judith R Denery; Ashlee A K Nunes; Mark S Hixon; Tobin J Dickerson; Kim D Janda
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-10-05

9.  Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of urinary N-Acetyltyramine-O,β-glucuronide (NATOG) as diagnostic biomarker for Onchocerca volvulus infection.

Authors:  Ole Lagatie; Emmanuel Njumbe Ediage; Linda Batsa Debrah; Luc Diels; Christ Nolten; Petra Vinken; Alex Debrah; Lieve Dillen; Steven Silber; Lieven J Stuyver
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Analysis of age-dependent trends in Ov16 IgG4 seroprevalence to onchocerciasis.

Authors:  Allison Golden; Dunia Faulx; Michael Kalnoky; Eric Stevens; Lindsay Yokobe; Roger Peck; Potochoziou Karabou; Méba Banla; Ramakrishna Rao; Kangi Adade; Richard G Gantin; Kossi Komlan; Peter T Soboslay; Tala de Los Santos; Gonzalo J Domingo
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.876

View more
  15 in total

1.  Comparison of PCR Methods for Onchocerca volvulus Detection in Skin Snip Biopsies from the Tshopo Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Authors:  Jessica L Prince-Guerra; Vitaliano A Cama; Nana Wilson; Elizabeth A Thiele; Josias Likwela; Nestor Ndakala; Jacques Muzinga Wa Muzinga; Nicholas Ayebazibwe; Yassa D Ndjakani; Naomi A Pitchouna; Dieudonne Mumba; Antoinette K Tshefu; Guilherme Ogawa; Paul T Cantey
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Onchocerciasis in Mozambique: An Unknown Condition for Health Professionals.

Authors:  Emilia Virginia Noormahomed; Carmen Mascaró-Lazcano
Journal:  EC Microbiol       Date:  2019-03

3.  Pre-control relationship of onchocercal skin disease with onchocercal infection in Guinea Savanna, Northern Nigeria.

Authors:  Michele E Murdoch; Ian E Murdoch; Jennifer Evans; Haliru Yahaya; Ngozi Njepuome; Simon Cousens; Barrie R Jones; Adenike Abiose
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-03-29

Review 4.  Detection of helminths by loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay: a review of updated technology and future outlook.

Authors:  Miao-Han Deng; Lan-Yi Zhong; Okanurak Kamolnetr; Yanin Limpanont; Zhi-Yue Lv
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.520

5.  In Silico Identification of Novel Biomarkers and Development of New Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Filarial Parasites Mansonella perstans and Mansonella ozzardi.

Authors:  C B Poole; A Sinha; L Ettwiller; L Apone; K McKay; V Panchapakesa; N F Lima; M U Ferreira; S Wanji; C K S Carlow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The insufficiency of circulating miRNA and DNA as diagnostic tools or as biomarkers of treatment efficacy for Onchocerca volvulus.

Authors:  Cara L Macfarlane; Shannon Quek; Nicolas Pionnier; Joseph D Turner; Samuel Wanji; Simon C Wagstaff; Mark J Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Diagnostics for onchocerciasis in the era of elimination.

Authors:  Thomas R Unnasch; Allison Golden; Vitaliano Cama; Paul T Cantey
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.473

8.  Development of a multiplex qPCR-based approach for the diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis, D. repens and Acanthocheilonema reconditum.

Authors:  Younes Laidoudi; Bernard Davoust; Marie Varloud; El Hadji Amadou Niang; Florence Fenollar; Oleg Mediannikov
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  Determinants of community-led ivermectin treatment adherence for onchocerciasis control in Western Ethiopia: a case-control study.

Authors:  Fikadu Ayalew; Desta Debalkie Atnafu; Melkamu Bedimo; Kebadnew Mulatu
Journal:  Trop Med Health       Date:  2020-04-20

10.  Detection of DNA of filariae closely related to Mansonella perstans in faecal samples from wild non-human primates from Cameroon and Gabon.

Authors:  Colette Marie Gaillard; Sebastien David Pion; Hadjira Hamou; Constant Sirima; Charlotte Bizet; Thomas Lemarcis; Jules Rodrigues; Amandine Esteban; Martine Peeters; Eitel Mpoudi Ngole; Illich Mombo; Florian Liégeois; Coralie Martin; Michel Boussinesq; Sabrina Locatelli
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.