Literature DB >> 27904954

The mathematics of xenology: di-cographs, symbolic ultrametrics, 2-structures and tree-representable systems of binary relations.

Marc Hellmuth1,2, Peter F Stadler3,4,5,6,7, Nicolas Wieseke8,9.   

Abstract

The concepts of orthology, paralogy, and xenology play a key role in molecular evolution. Orthology and paralogy distinguish whether a pair of genes originated by speciation or duplication. The corresponding binary relations on a set of genes form complementary cographs. Allowing more than two types of ancestral event types leads to symmetric symbolic ultrametrics. Horizontal gene transfer, which leads to xenologous gene pairs, however, is inherent asymmetric since one offspring copy "jumps" into another genome, while the other continues to be inherited vertically. We therefore explore here the mathematical structure of the non-symmetric generalization of symbolic ultrametrics. Our main results tie non-symmetric ultrametrics together with di-cographs (the directed generalization of cographs), so-called uniformly non-prime ([Formula: see text]) 2-structures, and hierarchical structures on the set of strong modules. This yields a characterization of relation structures that can be explained in terms of trees and types of ancestral events. This framework accommodates a horizontal-transfer relation in terms of an ancestral event and thus, is slightly different from the the most commonly used definition of xenology. As a first step towards a practical use, we present a simple polynomial-time recognition algorithm of [Formula: see text] 2-structures and investigate the computational complexity of several types of editing problems for [Formula: see text] 2-structures. We show, finally that these NP-complete problems can be solved exactly as Integer Linear Programs.

Keywords:  2-Structures; Di-cograph; Gene tree; Integer Linear Program; NP-completeness; Orthologs; Paralogs; Recognition algorithm; Symbolic ultrametric; Uniformly non-prime decomposition; Xenologs

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27904954     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-016-1084-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  15 in total

1.  Orthology relations, symbolic ultrametrics, and cographs.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernandez-Rosales; Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 2.  Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 3.  Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution.

Authors:  Patrick J Keeling; Jeffrey D Palmer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Phylogenomics with paralogs.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Nicolas Wieseke; Marcus Lechner; Hans-Peter Lenhof; Martin Middendorf; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life.

Authors:  Shannon M Soucy; Jinling Huang; Johann Peter Gogarten
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins.

Authors:  W M Fitch
Journal:  Syst Zool       Date:  1970-06

7.  The link between orthology relations and gene trees: a correction perspective.

Authors:  Manuel Lafond; Riccardo Dondi; Nadia El-Mabrouk
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Lechner; Sven Findeiss; Lydia Steiner; Manja Marz; Peter F Stadler; Sonja J Prohaska
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Orthologs and paralogs - we need to get it right.

Authors:  R A Jensen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-08-03       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Standardized benchmarking in the quest for orthologs.

Authors:  Adrian M Altenhoff; Brigitte Boeckmann; Salvador Capella-Gutierrez; Daniel A Dalquen; Todd DeLuca; Kristoffer Forslund; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Benjamin Linard; Cécile Pereira; Leszek P Pryszcz; Fabian Schreiber; Alan Sousa da Silva; Damian Szklarczyk; Clément-Marie Train; Peer Bork; Odile Lecompte; Christian von Mering; Ioannis Xenarios; Kimmen Sjölander; Lars Juhl Jensen; Maria J Martin; Matthieu Muffato; Toni Gabaldón; Suzanna E Lewis; Paul D Thomas; Erik Sonnhammer; Christophe Dessimoz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  10 in total

1.  Best match graphs.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Edgar Chávez; Marcos González Laffitte; Alitzel López Sánchez; Bärbel M R Stadler; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Reconciling event-labeled gene trees with MUL-trees and species networks.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Reconstructing gene trees from Fitch's xenology relation.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; John Anders; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Indirect identification of horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  David Schaller; Manuel Lafond; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Inferring phylogenetic trees from the knowledge of rare evolutionary events.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernandez-Rosales; Yangjing Long; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Reciprocal best match graphs.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Peter F Stadler; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Reconstruction of time-consistent species trees.

Authors:  Manuel Lafond; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  Biologically feasible gene trees, reconciliation maps and informative triples.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.405

9.  Best match graphs and reconciliation of gene trees with species trees.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Marcos E González Laffitte; Alitzel López Sánchez; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.259

10.  Time-consistent reconciliation maps and forbidden time travel.

Authors:  Nikolai Nøjgaard; Manuela Geiß; Daniel Merkle; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.405

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.