Literature DB >> 22456957

Orthology relations, symbolic ultrametrics, and cographs.

Marc Hellmuth1, Maribel Hernandez-Rosales, Katharina T Huber, Vincent Moulton, Peter F Stadler, Nicolas Wieseke.   

Abstract

Orthology detection is an important problem in comparative and evolutionary genomics and, consequently, a variety of orthology detection methods have been devised in recent years. Although many of these methods are dependent on generating gene and/or species trees, it has been shown that orthology can be estimated at acceptable levels of accuracy without having to infer gene trees and/or reconciling gene trees with species trees. Thus, it is of interest to understand how much information about the gene tree, the species tree, and their reconciliation is already contained in the orthology relation on the underlying set of genes. Here we shall show that a result by Böcker and Dress concerning symbolic ultrametrics, and subsequent algorithmic results by Semple and Steel for processing these structures can throw a considerable amount of light on this problem. More specifically, building upon these authors' results, we present some new characterizations for symbolic ultrametrics and new algorithms for recovering the associated trees, with an emphasis on how these algorithms could be potentially extended to deal with arbitrary orthology relations. In so doing we shall also show that, somewhat surprisingly, symbolic ultrametrics are very closely related to cographs, graphs that do not contain an induced path on any subset of four vertices. We conclude with a discussion on how our results might be applied in practice to orthology detection.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22456957     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-012-0525-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  13 in total

1.  Computational methods for Gene Orthology inference.

Authors:  David M Kristensen; Yuri I Wolf; Arcady R Mushegian; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Trees within trees: phylogeny and historical associations.

Authors:  R D Page; M A Charleston
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Christian J Stoeckert; David S Roos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Lechner; Sven Findeiss; Lydia Steiner; Manja Marz; Peter F Stadler; Sonja J Prohaska
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  MetaPhOrs: orthology and paralogy predictions from multiple phylogenetic evidence using a consistency-based confidence score.

Authors:  Leszek P Pryszcz; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Toni Gabaldón
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  TreeFam: a curated database of phylogenetic trees of animal gene families.

Authors:  Heng Li; Avril Coghlan; Jue Ruan; Lachlan James Coin; Jean-Karim Hériché; Lara Osmotherly; Ruiqiang Li; Tao Liu; Zhang Zhang; Lars Bolund; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Weimou Zheng; Paramvir Dehal; Jun Wang; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Berkeley PHOG: PhyloFacts orthology group prediction web server.

Authors:  Ruchira S Datta; Christopher Meacham; Bushra Samad; Christoph Neyer; Kimmen Sjölander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods.

Authors:  Adrian M Altenhoff; Christophe Dessimoz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Ensembl 2007.

Authors:  T J P Hubbard; B L Aken; K Beal; B Ballester; M Caccamo; Y Chen; L Clarke; G Coates; F Cunningham; T Cutts; T Down; S C Dyer; S Fitzgerald; J Fernandez-Banet; S Graf; S Haider; M Hammond; J Herrero; R Holland; K Howe; K Howe; N Johnson; A Kahari; D Keefe; F Kokocinski; E Kulesha; D Lawson; I Longden; C Melsopp; K Megy; P Meidl; B Ouverdin; A Parker; A Prlic; S Rice; D Rios; M Schuster; I Sealy; J Severin; G Slater; D Smedley; G Spudich; S Trevanion; A Vilella; J Vogel; S White; M Wood; T Cox; V Curwen; R Durbin; X M Fernandez-Suarez; P Flicek; A Kasprzyk; G Proctor; S Searle; J Smith; A Ureta-Vidal; E Birney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  InParanoid 6: eukaryotic ortholog clusters with inparalogs.

Authors:  Ann-Charlotte Berglund; Erik Sjölund; Gabriel Ostlund; Erik L L Sonnhammer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  23 in total

1.  Best match graphs.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Edgar Chávez; Marcos González Laffitte; Alitzel López Sánchez; Bärbel M R Stadler; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Orthology and paralogy constraints: satisfiability and consistency.

Authors:  Manuel Lafond; Nadia El-Mabrouk
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Phylogenomics with paralogs.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Nicolas Wieseke; Marcus Lechner; Hans-Peter Lenhof; Martin Middendorf; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reconciling event-labeled gene trees with MUL-trees and species networks.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  The mathematics of xenology: di-cographs, symbolic ultrametrics, 2-structures and tree-representable systems of binary relations.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Reconstructing gene trees from Fitch's xenology relation.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; John Anders; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Indirect identification of horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  David Schaller; Manuel Lafond; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Inferring phylogenetic trees from the knowledge of rare evolutionary events.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernandez-Rosales; Yangjing Long; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Reciprocal best match graphs.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Peter F Stadler; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.259

10.  Biologically feasible gene trees, reconciliation maps and informative triples.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.