Literature DB >> 31691135

Reciprocal best match graphs.

Manuela Geiß1,2, Peter F Stadler1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Marc Hellmuth9,10.   

Abstract

Reciprocal best matches play an important role in numerous applications in computational biology, in particular as the basis of many widely used tools for orthology assessment. Nevertheless, very little is known about their mathematical structure. Here, we investigate the structure of reciprocal best match graphs (RBMGs). In order to abstract from the details of measuring distances, we define reciprocal best matches here as pairwise most closely related leaves in a gene tree, arguing that conceptually this is the notion that is pragmatically approximated by distance- or similarity-based heuristics. We start by showing that a graph G is an RBMG if and only if its quotient graph w.r.t. a certain thinness relation is an RBMG. Furthermore, it is necessary and sufficient that all connected components of G are RBMGs. The main result of this contribution is a complete characterization of RBMGs with 3 colors/species that can be checked in polynomial time. For 3 colors, there are three distinct classes of trees that are related to the structure of the phylogenetic trees explaining them. We derive an approach to recognize RBMGs with an arbitrary number of colors; it remains open however, whether a polynomial-time for RBMG recognition exists. In addition, we show that RBMGs that at the same time are cographs (co-RBMGs) can be recognized in polynomial time. Co-RBMGs are characterized in terms of hierarchically colored cographs, a particular class of vertex colored cographs that is introduced here. The (least resolved) trees that explain co-RBMGs can be constructed in polynomial time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hierarchically colored cograph; Pairwise best hit; Phylogenetic tree; Reciprocal best match heuristics; Vertex colored graph

Year:  2019        PMID: 31691135     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-019-01444-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  20 in total

1.  The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling.

Authors:  R Overbeek; M Fonstein; M D'Souza; G D Pusch; N Maltsev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Orthology relations, symbolic ultrametrics, and cographs.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernandez-Rosales; Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Best match graphs.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Edgar Chávez; Marcos González Laffitte; Alitzel López Sánchez; Bärbel M R Stadler; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Reconstructing gene trees from Fitch's xenology relation.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; John Anders; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Biologically feasible gene trees, reconciliation maps and informative triples.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.405

6.  QuartetS: a fast and accurate algorithm for large-scale orthology detection.

Authors:  Chenggang Yu; Nela Zavaljevski; Valmik Desai; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  OrthoGNC: A Software for Accurate Identification of Orthologs Based on Gene Neighborhood Conservation.

Authors:  Soheil Jahangiri-Tazehkand; Limsoon Wong; Changiz Eslahchi
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 7.691

8.  Best match graphs and reconciliation of gene trees with species trees.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Marcos E González Laffitte; Alitzel López Sánchez; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods.

Authors:  Adrian M Altenhoff; Christophe Dessimoz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Standardized benchmarking in the quest for orthologs.

Authors:  Adrian M Altenhoff; Brigitte Boeckmann; Salvador Capella-Gutierrez; Daniel A Dalquen; Todd DeLuca; Kristoffer Forslund; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Benjamin Linard; Cécile Pereira; Leszek P Pryszcz; Fabian Schreiber; Alan Sousa da Silva; Damian Szklarczyk; Clément-Marie Train; Peer Bork; Odile Lecompte; Christian von Mering; Ioannis Xenarios; Kimmen Sjölander; Lars Juhl Jensen; Maria J Martin; Matthieu Muffato; Toni Gabaldón; Suzanna E Lewis; Paul D Thomas; Erik Sonnhammer; Christophe Dessimoz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  5 in total

1.  Indirect identification of horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  David Schaller; Manuel Lafond; Peter F Stadler; Nicolas Wieseke; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Reconstruction of time-consistent species trees.

Authors:  Manuel Lafond; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  From pairs of most similar sequences to phylogenetic best matches.

Authors:  Peter F Stadler; Manuela Geiß; David Schaller; Alitzel López Sánchez; Marcos González Laffitte; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 1.405

4.  Complete Characterization of Incorrect Orthology Assignments in Best Match Graphs.

Authors:  David Schaller; Manuela Geiß; Peter F Stadler; Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Best match graphs and reconciliation of gene trees with species trees.

Authors:  Manuela Geiß; Marcos E González Laffitte; Alitzel López Sánchez; Dulce I Valdivia; Marc Hellmuth; Maribel Hernández Rosales; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.259

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.