| Literature DB >> 27904722 |
Jong-Hwa Park1, Jae-Sung Ahn1, Ho-Jin Lee1, Byung-Kon Shin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laminoplasty is a surgical procedure frequently performed for cervical myelopathy. We investigated correlations between changes in the anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the spinal canal, spinal canal area (SCA), and laminar angle (LA) and clinical outcomes of laminoplasty.Entities:
Keywords: Laminar angle; Laminoplasty; Myelopathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27904722 PMCID: PMC5114252 DOI: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Surg ISSN: 2005-291X
Fig. 1Postoperative computed tomography (CT) of a 61-year-old male patient who underwent cervical laminoplasty. Each cross-section of the CT image is parallel to the lower surface of the corresponding vertebral body.
Fig. 2The anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the spinal canal and the spinal canal area (SCA) were measured in the axial plane at the middle of the vertebral body on the sagittal computed tomography (CT) scan using the polygonal region of interest (ROI) tool of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) preoperatively (A-C) and postoperatively (D-F).
Fig. 3Measurements of the laminar angle created by one line passing posterior to the transverse foramen and the other line traversing along the inside edge of the lamina on the preoperative (A, B) and postoperative (C, D) computed tomography scans. The difference between the preoperative angle (a) and the postoperative angle (b) was recorded.
Pre- and Postoperative Radiographic Measurements
| Parameter | Preoperative | Postoperative |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal canal area (mm2) | 225.9 ± 35.8 | 356.3 ± 43.3 |
| AP diameter (mm) | 11.5 ± 1.8 | 17.8 ± 2.2 |
| Laminar angle (°) | 34.2 ± 4.5 | 71.9 ± 6.7 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
AP: anteroposterior.
Pre- and Postoperative Spinal Canal Area at Each Level
| Level | Preoperative spinal canal area (mm2) | Postoperative spinal canal area (mm2) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 218.02 ± 30.61 | 348.58 ± 39.66 |
| 4 | 219.58 ± 32.71 | 347.53 ± 38.16 |
| 5 | 231.55 ± 38.80 | 361.64 ± 38.86 |
| 6 | 221.03 ± 39.41 | 367.03 ± 51.19 |
| 7 | 225.95 ± 26.14 | 359.07 ± 71.34 |
| Total | 225.94 ± 35.87 | 356.30 ± 43.30 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Pre- and Postoperative Clinical Evaluation
| Parameter | Preoperative | Postoperative (final follow-up) |
|---|---|---|
| JOA score | 9.1 ± 1.8 (5–13) | 13.4 ± 1.4 (8–16) |
| Visual analog scale | 5.0 ± 1.2 (3–8) | 2.0 ± 0.9 (1–5) |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range).
JOA: Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
Comparison of Variables from Pearson Correlation Analysis
| Variable | JOA recovery rate* | Changes in spinal area (total) | Changes in AP length | Changes in laminar angle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOA recovery rate | 1 | 0.174 | 0.071 | −0.449† |
| Changes in spinal area (total) | - | 1 | 0.084 | −0.236 |
| Changes in AP length | - | - | 1 | 0.158 |
| Changes in laminar angle | - | - | - | 1 |
JOA: Japanese Orthopaedic Association, AP: anteroposterior.
*JOA recovery rate = 100 × (postoperative JOA score – preoperative JOA score) / (17 – preoperative JOA score). †p < 0.01.
One Way ANOVA Analysis of JOA Recovery Rate and Changes in Laminar Angle
| Group | No. | JOA recovery rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | ||
| A (< 25%, 33°) | 12 | 69.8 ± 6.9 | 57.1–83.3 |
| B (≥ 25% & < 50%, 38°) | 12 | 53.2 ± 10.5 | 37.5–71.4 |
| C (≥ 50% & < 75%, 41°) | 12 | 49.7 ± 7.9 | 37.5–60.0 |
| D (≥ 75%) | 13 | 47.6 ± 13.7 | 25.0–71.4 |
JOA: Japanese Orthopaedic Association, SD: standard deviation.
Fig. 4One way ANOVA analysis of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) recovery rate and ΔLA (changes in laminar angle). The patients were divided into 4 groups based on the ΔLA percentile (group A, < 25%; B, ≥ 25% & < 50%; C, ≥ 50% & < 75%; D, ≥ 75%). Group A showed a significant improvement in JOA score compared to the other groups (*p < 0.05) (N = 49, F = 11.622).