Literature DB >> 21192219

Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures.

John M Rhee1, Bradley Register, Takahiko Hamasaki, Betty Franklin.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical series.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of plate-only laminoplasty to achieve stable laminar arch reconstruction and to determine the rate and time course with which bony healing occurs in such constructs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Reconstruction of a stable laminar arch with sufficient room for the decompressed spinal cord is a desired goal when performing cervical laminoplasty for myelopathy. Traditional forms of laminoplasty fixation, such as sutures, bone struts, and ceramic spacers, may be associated with complications including loss of fixation, dislodgement with neurologic compromise, and premature laminoplasty closure. Plates, in contrast, provide more rigid fixation. Plate-only laminoplasty is gaining popularity as a method of laminoplasty fixation, but there is little data on its effectiveness.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent open door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy and had available postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans formed the basis of this study. In all cases, a 4-mm round burr was used to create the hinge at the junction of the lateral mass and lamina by completely removing the dorsal cortex and thinning the ventral cortex until a greenstick deformation of the hinge could be produced. Laminoplasty plates were used as the sole method of fixation. No supplemental bone graft struts were used on the plated side, and the hinge side was not bone grafted. Axial CT scans obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were assessed for plate complications and bony healing of the hinge.
RESULTS: No plate failures, dislodgements, or premature closures occurred in any of the levels at any time postoperatively. Computed tomography scan review demonstrated that 55% of levels were healed at 3 months, 77% at 6 months, and 93% at 12 months. At each timepoint, C6 and C7 had the highest hinge healing rates. Laminar screw backout was seen in 5/217 (2.3%) of levels, but was not associated with plate dislodgement, laminoplasty closure, or neurologic consequences, and did not occur in any case in which 2 laminar screws had been placed.
CONCLUSION: Plate-only laminoplasty provided stable reconstruction of an expanded laminar arch with no failures, dislodgements, adverse neurologic consequences, or premature closures in 217 levels. Ninety-three percent of hinges demonstrated radiographic union at 12 months, and even those that did not heal by CT scan criteria maintained patent expansion of the spinal canal without adverse neurologic consequences. Supplemental bone graft does not appear necessary when plated laminoplasty is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21192219     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fea49c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

Review 1.  What's new in spine surgery.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Paul A Anderson; Scott D Boden; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Optimal area of lateral mass mini-screws implanted in plated cervical laminoplasty: a radiography anatomy study.

Authors:  Hua Chen; Huibo Li; Yuxiao Deng; Xin Rong; Quan Gong; Tao Li; Yueming Song; Hao Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Double-door cervical laminoplasty with suture anchors: evaluation of the clinical performance of the constructs.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Atsushi Nakano; Ichiro Baba; Shingo Fukumoto; Yoshiharu Nakaya; Masashi Neo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [All levels miniplate fixation and a modified hybrid fixation method in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study].

Authors:  Z C Yang; C X Liu; Y Lin; W H Hu; W J Chen; F Li; H Zeng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

5.  Hinge Fracture during Cervical Open-door Laminoplasty: Does it Affect Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes?

Authors:  Sung Hoon Cho; Jung Hwan Lee; Chung Kee Chough; Won Il Joo; Hae Kwan Park; Kyung Jin Lee; Hyoung Kyun Rha
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-06-30

6.  Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Lin-Nan Wang; Lei Wang; Yue-Ming Song; Xi Yang; Li-Min Liu; Tao Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparable clinical and radiological outcomes between skipped-level and all-level plating for open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Amy Yim Ling Cheung; Darren Lui; Kenneth M C Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Modified Open-door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers and Miniplates.

Authors:  Sung-Won Jin; Se-Hoon Kim; Bum-Joon Kim; Jong-Il Choi; Sung-Kon Ha; Sang-Dae Kim; Dong-Jun Lim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-09-30

9.  Laminoplasty and laminectomy hybrid decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with hypertrophic ligamentum flavum: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Huairong Ding; Yuan Xue; Yanming Tang; Dong He; Zhiyang Li; Ying Zhao; Yaqi Zong; Yi Wang; Pei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Union rate on hinge side after open-door laminoplasty using maxillofacial titanium miniplate.

Authors:  Koopong Siribumrungwong; Theerasan Kiriratnikom; Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.